Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hollandsworth v. Knyzewskigreen2 sentences2024Accordingly, the court held that Austin had the burden to rebut the presumption in favor of relocation pursuant to Hollandsworth v. Knyzewski, 353 Ark. 470 , 3 109 S.W.3d 653 (2003). 2024Accordingly, the court held that Austin had the burden to rebut the presumption in favor of relocation pursuant to Hollandsworth v. Knyzewski, 353 Ark. 470 , 3 109 S.W.3d 653 (2003). | 1 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Armstrong v. Draper
green
2 sentences2020Id. 2020Id. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.