Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 California opinions name it 3 courts 1921–1959 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Hornefgreen2 sentences1939The rule is stated succinctly in Ex parte Lieritz, (1913) 166 Cal. 298, 301 [ 135 Pac. 1129 ] : “The authorities almost without conflict declare that a complaint, indictment, or information need not allege that an accused comes within exceptions mentioned in the statute upon which the prosecution is founded.” We find it more completely set forth in Ex parte Hornef, (1908) 154 Cal. 355, 359 [ 97 Pac. 891 ], in the following words: “There is practically no conflict in the authorities as to what the general rule is in regard to the necessity of alleging in a complaint, indictment, or information, 1939The rule is stated succinctly in Ex parte Lieritz, (1913) 166 Cal. 298, 301 [ 135 Pac. 1129 ] : “The authorities almost without conflict declare that a complaint, indictment, or information need not allege that an accused comes within exceptions mentioned in the statute upon which the prosecution is founded.” We find it more completely set forth in Ex parte Hornef, (1908) 154 Cal. 355, 359 [ 97 Pac. 891 ], in the following words: “There is practically no conflict in the authorities as to what the general rule is in regard to the necessity of alleging in a complaint, indictment, or information, | 2 | 2 |
Matter of Application of Lieritzgreen2 sentences1939The rule is stated succinctly in Ex parte Lieritz, (1913) 166 Cal. 298, 301 [ 135 Pac. 1129 ] : “The authorities almost without conflict declare that a complaint, indictment, or information need not allege that an accused comes within exceptions mentioned in the statute upon which the prosecution is founded.” We find it more completely set forth in Ex parte Hornef, (1908) 154 Cal. 355, 359 [ 97 Pac. 891 ], in the following words: “There is practically no conflict in the authorities as to what the general rule is in regard to the necessity of alleging in a complaint, indictment, or information, 1939The rule is stated succinctly in Ex parte Lieritz, (1913) 166 Cal. 298, 301 [ 135 Pac. 1129 ] : “The authorities almost without conflict declare that a complaint, indictment, or information need not allege that an accused comes within exceptions mentioned in the statute upon which the prosecution is founded.” We find it more completely set forth in Ex parte Hornef, (1908) 154 Cal. 355, 359 [ 97 Pac. 891 ], in the following words: “There is practically no conflict in the authorities as to what the general rule is in regard to the necessity of alleging in a complaint, indictment, or information, | 2 | 2 |
Hedden v. Waldeckgreen2 sentences1959Fraud is closely akin to a charge of criminal conduct and the character of the proof to establish fraud should at least approximate that which is essential to prove guilt of crime. ( Hedden v. Waldeck (1937), 9 Cal.2d 631, 636-637 [1-3] [ 72 P.2d 114 ].) I appreciate, of course, that it is in the trial court that the question is initially determined as to whether the evidence constitutes clear and convincing proof of the fact to be established, but that does not mean that the reviewing court shall not scrutinize the record to determine whether the facts which the evidence is sufficient to esta 1959Fraud is closely akin to a charge of criminal conduct and the character of the proof to establish fraud should at least approximate that which is essential to prove guilt of crime. ( Hedden v. Waldeck (1937), 9 Cal.2d 631, 636-637 [1-3] [ 72 P.2d 114 ].) I appreciate, of course, that it is in the trial court that the question is initially determined as to whether the evidence constitutes clear and convincing proof of the fact to be established, but that does not mean that the reviewing court shall not scrutinize the record to determine whether the facts which the evidence is sufficient to esta | 1 | 1 |
Fisher v. Sweetgreen2 sentences1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ 1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ | 1 | 1 |
Singh v. Singhgreen2 sentences1935(Johnstone v. Morris, 210 Cal. 580 [ 292 Pac. 970 ]; De Rigne v. Hart, 94 Cal. App. 209 [ 270 Pac. 1013 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Singh v. Singh, 74 Cal. App. 396, 400 [240 Pac. 1025]; Brown v. Barnett, 111 Cal. App. 456 [ 295 Pac. 579 ].) In the case of De Rigne v. Hart, supra, the court says (p. 211) : “ ... since it is a thoroughly established rule that partners cannot sue one another at law in respect to any of the business of the partnership, or to recover damages from the one or the other of the copartners for a breach of the partnership agreement. 1935(Johnstone v. Morris, 210 Cal. 580 [ 292 Pac. 970 ]; De Rigne v. Hart, 94 Cal. App. 209 [ 270 Pac. 1013 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Singh v. Singh, 74 Cal. App. 396, 400 [240 Pac. 1025]; Brown v. Barnett, 111 Cal. App. 456 [ 295 Pac. 579 ].) In the case of De Rigne v. Hart, supra, the court says (p. 211) : “ ... since it is a thoroughly established rule that partners cannot sue one another at law in respect to any of the business of the partnership, or to recover damages from the one or the other of the copartners for a breach of the partnership agreement. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cooper v. Cooper
green
1 sentence1942(Richardson v. Lamp, 209 Cal. 668 [ 290 Pac. 14 ] ; Singh v. White, 111 Cal. App. 683 [ 296 Pac. 119 ] ; Cooper v. Cooper, 3 Cal. App. (2d) 154 [ 39 Pac. (2d) 820 ].) This being true the special defenses presented a material issue on which the trial court should have made findings. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Bright v. Zabler
neutral
1 sentence1942(Bright v. Zabler, 43 Cal. App. (2d) 706 [ 111 Pac. (2d) 387 ]; 10 Cal. Jur. 1172, and cases there cited.) The burden was upon appellant to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that “said Mabel Pearl Abrams was mentally incompetent to sign or execute said instrument” at the time of signing it. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Singh v. White
neutral
2 sentences1942(Richardson v. Lamp, 209 Cal. 668 [ 290 Pac. 14 ] ; Singh v. White, 111 Cal. App. 683 [ 296 Pac. 119 ] ; Cooper v. Cooper, 3 Cal. App. (2d) 154 [ 39 Pac. (2d) 820 ].) This being true the special defenses presented a material issue on which the trial court should have made findings. 1942(Richardson v. Lamp, 209 Cal. 668 [ 290 Pac. 14 ] ; Singh v. White, 111 Cal. App. 683 [ 296 Pac. 119 ] ; Cooper v. Cooper, 3 Cal. App. (2d) 154 [ 39 Pac. (2d) 820 ].) This being true the special defenses presented a material issue on which the trial court should have made findings. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Richardson v. Lamp
green
2 sentences1942(Richardson v. Lamp, 209 Cal. 668 [ 290 Pac. 14 ] ; Singh v. White, 111 Cal. App. 683 [ 296 Pac. 119 ] ; Cooper v. Cooper, 3 Cal. App. (2d) 154 [ 39 Pac. (2d) 820 ].) This being true the special defenses presented a material issue on which the trial court should have made findings. 1942(Richardson v. Lamp, 209 Cal. 668 [ 290 Pac. 14 ] ; Singh v. White, 111 Cal. App. 683 [ 296 Pac. 119 ] ; Cooper v. Cooper, 3 Cal. App. (2d) 154 [ 39 Pac. (2d) 820 ].) This being true the special defenses presented a material issue on which the trial court should have made findings. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Russell v. Ford
green
1 sentence1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Stone v. Fouse
green
1 sentence1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Nugent v. Locke
green
1 sentence1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Pico v. Cuyas
green
1 sentence1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Streeter & Riddell, Inc. v. Bacon
green
2 sentences1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ 1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Brown v. Barnett
neutral
2 sentences1935(Johnstone v. Morris, 210 Cal. 580 [ 292 Pac. 970 ]; De Rigne v. Hart, 94 Cal. App. 209 [ 270 Pac. 1013 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Singh v. Singh, 74 Cal. App. 396, 400 [240 Pac. 1025]; Brown v. Barnett, 111 Cal. App. 456 [ 295 Pac. 579 ].) In the case of De Rigne v. Hart, supra, the court says (p. 211) : “ ... since it is a thoroughly established rule that partners cannot sue one another at law in respect to any of the business of the partnership, or to recover damages from the one or the other of the copartners for a breach of the partnership agreement. 1935(Johnstone v. Morris, 210 Cal. 580 [ 292 Pac. 970 ]; De Rigne v. Hart, 94 Cal. App. 209 [ 270 Pac. 1013 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Singh v. Singh, 74 Cal. App. 396, 400 [240 Pac. 1025]; Brown v. Barnett, 111 Cal. App. 456 [ 295 Pac. 579 ].) In the case of De Rigne v. Hart, supra, the court says (p. 211) : “ ... since it is a thoroughly established rule that partners cannot sue one another at law in respect to any of the business of the partnership, or to recover damages from the one or the other of the copartners for a breach of the partnership agreement. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Rassaert v. Mensch
neutral
2 sentences1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ 1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Zurich Insurance v. Coachella Valley Home Telephone & Telegraph Co.
neutral
2 sentences1935Co. v. *453 Home Tel. etc. Co., 119 Cal. App. 65 [ 5 Pac. (2d) 943 ].) We are not concerned with this rule, because, as already pointed out, insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment cannot be considered, since the order was not made upon that ground. 1935Co. v. *453 Home Tel. etc. Co., 119 Cal. App. 65 [ 5 Pac. (2d) 943 ].) We are not concerned with this rule, because, as already pointed out, insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment cannot be considered, since the order was not made upon that ground. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
De Rigne v. Hart
green
2 sentences1935(Johnstone v. Morris, 210 Cal. 580 [ 292 Pac. 970 ]; De Rigne v. Hart, 94 Cal. App. 209 [ 270 Pac. 1013 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Singh v. Singh, 74 Cal. App. 396, 400 [240 Pac. 1025]; Brown v. Barnett, 111 Cal. App. 456 [ 295 Pac. 579 ].) In the case of De Rigne v. Hart, supra, the court says (p. 211) : “ ... since it is a thoroughly established rule that partners cannot sue one another at law in respect to any of the business of the partnership, or to recover damages from the one or the other of the copartners for a breach of the partnership agreement. 1935(Johnstone v. Morris, 210 Cal. 580 [ 292 Pac. 970 ]; De Rigne v. Hart, 94 Cal. App. 209 [ 270 Pac. 1013 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Singh v. Singh, 74 Cal. App. 396, 400 [240 Pac. 1025]; Brown v. Barnett, 111 Cal. App. 456 [ 295 Pac. 579 ].) In the case of De Rigne v. Hart, supra, the court says (p. 211) : “ ... since it is a thoroughly established rule that partners cannot sue one another at law in respect to any of the business of the partnership, or to recover damages from the one or the other of the copartners for a breach of the partnership agreement. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Buckley v. Carlisle
neutral
1 sentence1935(Stone v. Fouse, 3 Cal. 292, 294 ; Russell v. Ford, 2 Cal. 86 ; Buckley v. Carlisle, 2 Cal. 420 ; Nugent v. Locke, 4 Cal. 318, 320 ; Pico v. Cuyas, 47 Cal. 174 ; Fisher v. Sweet, 67 Cal. 228, 230 [ 7 Pac. 657 ]; Bremner v. Leavitt, 109 Cal. 130 [ 41 Pac. 859 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Rassaert v. Mensch, 17 Cal. App. 637 [ 120 Pac. 1072 ]; Streeter & Riddell, Inc., v. Bacon, 49 Cal. App. 327 [ 193 Pac. 285 ].) As the foregoing cases say, the remedy is by a suit in equity for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting and settlement of the partnership affairs. ’ ’ | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Dukes v. Kellogg
green
2 sentences1935(Johnstone v. Morris, 210 Cal. 580 [ 292 Pac. 970 ]; De Rigne v. Hart, 94 Cal. App. 209 [ 270 Pac. 1013 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Singh v. Singh, 74 Cal. App. 396, 400 [240 Pac. 1025]; Brown v. Barnett, 111 Cal. App. 456 [ 295 Pac. 579 ].) In the case of De Rigne v. Hart, supra, the court says (p. 211) : “ ... since it is a thoroughly established rule that partners cannot sue one another at law in respect to any of the business of the partnership, or to recover damages from the one or the other of the copartners for a breach of the partnership agreement. 1935(Johnstone v. Morris, 210 Cal. 580 [ 292 Pac. 970 ]; De Rigne v. Hart, 94 Cal. App. 209 [ 270 Pac. 1013 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Singh v. Singh, 74 Cal. App. 396, 400 [240 Pac. 1025]; Brown v. Barnett, 111 Cal. App. 456 [ 295 Pac. 579 ].) In the case of De Rigne v. Hart, supra, the court says (p. 211) : “ ... since it is a thoroughly established rule that partners cannot sue one another at law in respect to any of the business of the partnership, or to recover damages from the one or the other of the copartners for a breach of the partnership agreement. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Johnstone v. Morris
green
2 sentences1935(Johnstone v. Morris, 210 Cal. 580 [ 292 Pac. 970 ]; De Rigne v. Hart, 94 Cal. App. 209 [ 270 Pac. 1013 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Singh v. Singh, 74 Cal. App. 396, 400 [240 Pac. 1025]; Brown v. Barnett, 111 Cal. App. 456 [ 295 Pac. 579 ].) In the case of De Rigne v. Hart, supra, the court says (p. 211) : “ ... since it is a thoroughly established rule that partners cannot sue one another at law in respect to any of the business of the partnership, or to recover damages from the one or the other of the copartners for a breach of the partnership agreement. 1935(Johnstone v. Morris, 210 Cal. 580 [ 292 Pac. 970 ]; De Rigne v. Hart, 94 Cal. App. 209 [ 270 Pac. 1013 ]; Dukes v. Kellogg, 127 Cal. 563 [ 60 Pac. 44 ]; Singh v. Singh, 74 Cal. App. 396, 400 [240 Pac. 1025]; Brown v. Barnett, 111 Cal. App. 456 [ 295 Pac. 579 ].) In the case of De Rigne v. Hart, supra, the court says (p. 211) : “ ... since it is a thoroughly established rule that partners cannot sue one another at law in respect to any of the business of the partnership, or to recover damages from the one or the other of the copartners for a breach of the partnership agreement. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Globe Savings Bank v. National Bank of Commerce
green
2 sentences1921Bank v. National Bank of Commerce, 64 Neb. 413 , [ 89 N. W. 1030 ].) We are not disposed to follow these cases, in view of the thoroughly established rule to the contrary. 1921Bank v. National Bank of Commerce, 64 Neb. 413 , [ 89 N. W. 1030 ].) We are not disposed to follow these cases, in view of the thoroughly established rule to the contrary. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.