Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1992–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.green2 sentences2001"In Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc., 193 Conn. 558 , 479 A.2d 781 (1984), our Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the doctrine of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is applicable to the termination of an employment contract. . . . 2001"In Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc., 193 Conn. 558 , 479 A.2d 781 (1984), our Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the doctrine of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is applicable to the termination of an employment contract. . . . | 1 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Doherty v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences2000In Doherty v. Sullivan, 29 Conn. App. 736 (1992), the Appellate Court held that, although the doctrine of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing applies to at will employment contracts, the essence of the doctrine is the fulfillment of the reasonable expectations of the parties including the expectation that the at will employee may be terminated at any time without cause, Id., 742 and 743. 2000In Doherty v. Sullivan, 29 Conn. App. 736 (1992), the Appellate Court held that, although the doctrine of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing applies to at will employment contracts, the essence of the doctrine is the fulfillment of the reasonable expectations of the parties including the expectation that the at will employee may be terminated at any time without cause, Id., 742 and 743. | 3 | 2000–2001 |
Rosati v. Bekhor
green
1 sentence2015Third, in Rosati v. Bekhor, supra, 1345 , the court decided that, because the subject of the arbitration was securities fraud, the parties were on notice that any section of securities law involving fraud could be used in the arbitration. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Carbone v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
green
1 sentence1998Where employment is clearly terminable at will, a party cannot ordinarily be deemed to lack good faith in exercising this contractual right", Magnan v. Ananconda Industries Inc , 193 Conn. 558 , 572 (1984) Building upon and adopting this position the court in Carbone v. Atlantic Richfield Inc. , 204 Conn. 460 , 470-471 (1987) went on to say: CT Page 14660 "Thus, absent a showing that the discharge involves an impropriety which intervenes some important public policy, an employee may not challenge a dismissal based upon an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing." In the employment cont | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.