Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jarrett
green
2 sentences2008“We have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” State v. Jarrett, 82 Conn. App. 489, 497 , *231 845 A.2d 476 , cert. denied, 269 Conn. 911 , 852 A.2d 741 (2004). 2008“We have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” State v. Jarrett, 82 Conn. App. 489, 497 , *231 845 A.2d 476 , cert. denied, 269 Conn. 911 , 852 A.2d 741 (2004). | 3 | 2005–2008 |
State v. Jarrett
green
2 sentences2008“We have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” State v. Jarrett, 82 Conn. App. 489, 497 , *231 845 A.2d 476 , cert. denied, 269 Conn. 911 , 852 A.2d 741 (2004). 2008“We have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” State v. Jarrett, 82 Conn. App. 489, 497 , *231 845 A.2d 476 , cert. denied, 269 Conn. 911 , 852 A.2d 741 (2004). | 3 | 2005–2008 |
State v. Serrano
yellow
2 sentences2006“We have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Serrano, 91 Conn. App. 227, 245 , 880 A.2d 183 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 908 , 884 A.2d 1029 (2005). 2006“We have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Serrano, 91 Conn. App. 227, 245 , 880 A.2d 183 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 908 , 884 A.2d 1029 (2005). | 2 | 2005–2006 |
State v. Serrano
yellow
2 sentences2006“We have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Serrano, 91 Conn. App. 227, 245 , 880 A.2d 183 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 908 , 884 A.2d 1029 (2005). 2006“We have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Serrano, 91 Conn. App. 227, 245 , 880 A.2d 183 , cert. denied, 276 Conn. 908 , 884 A.2d 1029 (2005). | 2 | 2005–2006 |
State v. Delosantos
green
2 sentences1998We also note that the defendants did not bring the incorrect statement to the trial court’s attention immediately following the trial court’s charge when there was time for the trial court to correct it. 14 When giving a lengthy jury instruction, as in this case, “an inadvertent slip of the tongue by the trial court”; State v. Delosantos, 13 Conn. App. 386, 391 , 536 A.2d 609 (1988); may occur. 1998We also note that the defendants did not bring the incorrect statement to the trial court’s attention immediately following the trial court’s charge when there was time for the trial court to correct it. 14 When giving a lengthy jury instruction, as in this case, “an inadvertent slip of the tongue by the trial court”; State v. Delosantos, 13 Conn. App. 386, 391 , 536 A.2d 609 (1988); may occur. | 2 | 1998–2001 |
State v. Mahon
green
2 sentences2008“We have held that an inadvertent slip of the tongue in summarizing jury instructions does not mean that a defendant was deprived of his right to a fair trial when the record reveals that the court properly instructed the jury on the elements of the crime.” State v. Mahon, 97 Conn. App. 503, 519 , 905 A.2d 678 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006). 2008“We have held that an inadvertent slip of the tongue in summarizing jury instructions does not mean that a defendant was deprived of his right to a fair trial when the record reveals that the court properly instructed the jury on the elements of the crime.” State v. Mahon, 97 Conn. App. 503, 519 , 905 A.2d 678 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Mahon
green
2 sentences2008“We have held that an inadvertent slip of the tongue in summarizing jury instructions does not mean that a defendant was deprived of his right to a fair trial when the record reveals that the court properly instructed the jury on the elements of the crime.” State v. Mahon, 97 Conn. App. 503, 519 , 905 A.2d 678 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006). 2008“We have held that an inadvertent slip of the tongue in summarizing jury instructions does not mean that a defendant was deprived of his right to a fair trial when the record reveals that the court properly instructed the jury on the elements of the crime.” State v. Mahon, 97 Conn. App. 503, 519 , 905 A.2d 678 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 930 , 909 A.2d 958 (2006). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Schiavo
green
2 sentences2006First, we note that “[w]e have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Schiavo, 93 Conn. App. 290, 298 , 888 A.2d 1115 , cert. *192 denied, 277 Conn. 923 , 895 A.2d 797 (2006). 2006First, we note that “[w]e have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Schiavo, 93 Conn. App. 290, 298 , 888 A.2d 1115 , cert. *192 denied, 277 Conn. 923 , 895 A.2d 797 (2006). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Schiavo
green
2 sentences2006First, we note that “[w]e have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Schiavo, 93 Conn. App. 290, 298 , 888 A.2d 1115 , cert. *192 denied, 277 Conn. 923 , 895 A.2d 797 (2006). 2006First, we note that “[w]e have recognized that when a court gives a lengthy jury instruction, a slip of the tongue may occasionally occur.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Schiavo, 93 Conn. App. 290, 298 , 888 A.2d 1115 , cert. *192 denied, 277 Conn. 923 , 895 A.2d 797 (2006). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opotzner v. Bass
green
2 sentences2004Opotzner v. Bass, 63 Conn. App. 555, 562 , 777 A.2d 718 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 910 , 782 A.2d 134 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 930 , 793 A.2d 1086 (2002). 2004Opotzner v. Bass, 63 Conn. App. 555, 562 , 777 A.2d 718 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 910 , 782 A.2d 134 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 930 , 793 A.2d 1086 (2002). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opotzner v. Bass
green
2 sentences2004Opotzner v. Bass, 63 Conn. App. 555, 562 , 777 A.2d 718 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 910 , 782 A.2d 134 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 930 , 793 A.2d 1086 (2002). 2004Opotzner v. Bass, 63 Conn. App. 555, 562 , 777 A.2d 718 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 910 , 782 A.2d 134 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 930 , 793 A.2d 1086 (2002). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opotzner v. Bass
green
2 sentences2004Opotzner v. Bass, 63 Conn. App. 555, 562 , 777 A.2d 718 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 910 , 782 A.2d 134 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 930 , 793 A.2d 1086 (2002). 2004Opotzner v. Bass, 63 Conn. App. 555, 562 , 777 A.2d 718 , cert. denied, 257 Conn. 910 , 782 A.2d 134 (2001), cert. denied, 259 Conn. 930 , 793 A.2d 1086 (2002). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. Gallo
green
2 sentences2001Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. Gallo, 50 Conn. App. 767, 787 , 720 A.2d 242 (1998), citing State v. Delosantos, 13 Conn. App. 386, 391 , 536 A.2d 609 (1988). 2001Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. Gallo, 50 Conn. App. 767, 787 , 720 A.2d 242 (1998), citing State v. Delosantos, 13 Conn. App. 386, 391 , 536 A.2d 609 (1988). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.