8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Form v. Steinhardtgreen1 sentence2023Daugharty v. Daugharty, 441 So. 2d 1160, 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). 4 Whether such an occasion occurred here, we simply cannot tell. 4 While the trial court’s order seems to suggest Appellant’s attorneys also worked to benefit the partition, this introductory clause within the order does so only within the context of concluding that such a finding does not preclude apportionment of attorneys’ fees in favor of Appellee. | 1 | 1 |
Robins v. Colombogreen1 sentence2021See Robins v. Colombo, 253 So. 3d 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (recognizing: “As a general rule, the failure to make a contemporaneous objection constitutes a waiver of a claim on appeal, absent fundamental 4 error”); Liberty Mut. | 1 | 1 |
Freitag v. McGhiegreen2 sentences2016See Schmidt, 319 P.3d at 425-27 ; Freitag, 947 P.2d at 1189, 1190 . 2016See Schmidt, 319 P.3d at 425-27 ; Frietag, 947 P.2d at 1189, 1190 . | 1 | 1 |
Schnidt v. HSC, Inc.green2 sentences2016See Schmidt, 319 P.3d at 425-27 ; Freitag, 947 P.2d at 1189, 1190 . 2016See Schmidt, 319 P.3d at 425-27 ; Frietag, 947 P.2d at 1189, 1190 . | 1 | 1 |
Sawyer v. Stategreen2 sentences2004Many titles addressed in our earlier single subject cases contained little more than a short phrase with either no or few conjunctions following an introductory clause such as "an act to be entitled." See Sawyer v. State, 100 Fla. 1603 , 132 So. 188, 191 (1931) (act entitled "An Act to Define and Punish Arson, and to Repeal Sections 5106, 5107, 5109, 5111 and 5114 of the Revised General Statutes of the State of Florida, Relating Thereto"); Ex Parte Winn, 100 Fla. 1050 , 130 So. 621 (1930) (same); Knight, 41 So. at 788 (act entitled "An act to prevent the cutting or removing of any timber from 2004Many titles addressed in our earlier single subject cases contained little more than a short phrase with either no or few conjunctions following an introductory clause such as "an act to be entitled." See Sawyer v. State, 100 Fla. 1603 , 132 So. 188, 191 (1931) (act entitled "An Act to Define and Punish Arson, and to Repeal Sections 5106, 5107, 5109, 5111 and 5114 of the Revised General Statutes of the State of Florida, Relating Thereto"); Ex Parte Winn, 100 Fla. 1050 , 130 So. 621 (1930) (same); Knight, 41 So. at 788 (act entitled "An act to prevent the cutting or removing of any timber from | 1 | 1 |
Colon v. Stategreen1 sentence1984Compare also Colon v. State, 430 So.2d 965 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), where, in giving the additional instruction, the judge connected parts one, two and three with the conjunction “and” when the conjunction “or” actually should have been used. | 1 | 1 |
Gay v. Canada Dry Bottling Co. of Floridagreen1 sentence1981Also relevant here are any amendments of section 893.13 since the enactment of chapter 76-200, for, "[t]he court has the right and duty, in arriving at the correct meaning of a prior statute, to consider subsequent legislation." Gay v. Canada Dry Bottling Co. of Florida, 59 So.2d 788, 790 (Fla. 1952). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Winn, Ex Parte
green
2 sentences2004Many titles addressed in our earlier single subject cases contained little more than a short phrase with either no or few conjunctions following an introductory clause such as "an act to be entitled." See Sawyer v. State, 100 Fla. 1603 , 132 So. 188, 191 (1931) (act entitled "An Act to Define and Punish Arson, and to Repeal Sections 5106, 5107, 5109, 5111 and 5114 of the Revised General Statutes of the State of Florida, Relating Thereto"); Ex Parte Winn, 100 Fla. 1050 , 130 So. 621 (1930) (same); Knight, 41 So. at 788 (act entitled "An act to prevent the cutting or removing of any timber from 2004Many titles addressed in our earlier single subject cases contained little more than a short phrase with either no or few conjunctions following an introductory clause such as "an act to be entitled." See Sawyer v. State, 100 Fla. 1603 , 132 So. 188, 191 (1931) (act entitled "An Act to Define and Punish Arson, and to Repeal Sections 5106, 5107, 5109, 5111 and 5114 of the Revised General Statutes of the State of Florida, Relating Thereto"); Ex Parte Winn, 100 Fla. 1050 , 130 So. 621 (1930) (same); Knight, 41 So. at 788 (act entitled "An act to prevent the cutting or removing of any timber from | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State ex rel. Gonzalez v. Palmes
neutral
1 sentence2004Gonzalez v. Palmes, 23 Fla. 620 , 3 So. 171 , 172 (1887) (act entitled "An act to fix the license tax of stevedores"). [18] In Bryan, the title contained forty-one separate provisions. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Cameron v. Cameron
green
1 sentence1999Id. at 276 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Parker v. State
green
1 sentence1990Furthermore, in Parker v. State, 495 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), review denied, 504 So.2d 768 (Fla. 1987), the district court concluded that including the disjunctive word "or," between the three elements of the introductory instruction, did not cure the error created by the trial court's failure to mention that defendant could be excused upon a finding of one of the three criteria set forth in section 782.03, Florida Statutes (1983). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Kingery v. State
green
1 sentence1990The First District Court of Appeal in Kingery v. State, 523 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), also found error when the trial court gave the third part of the excusable homicide instruction without evidence of sudden combat. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.