introductory clause (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

introductory clause in Texas

8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Brown v. Dardengreen
tex · 1932 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008See id.

2008See id.

33
Valence Operating Co. v. Dorsettgreen
tex · 2005 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023See Valence, 164 S.W.3d at 662 .

11
Spiritas v. Robinowitzgreen
texapp · 1976 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See Spiritas v. Robinowitz, 544 S.W.2d 710, 718-19 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1976, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Ward v. State red
texcrimapp · 1992
1 sentence

2024He contends that to successfully amend the indictment, the State could only have (1) interlineated the document, (2) attached a photocopy of the amendment to the indictment, or (3) recited the actual amending language in the order of the district The State began with the introductory clause from the original indictment and 3 then read verbatim the language from paragraph two of the amendment motion. 7 court, citing as authority Ward v. State, 829 S.W.2d 787 (Tex. Crim.

12024–2024
Riney v. State green
texcrimapp · 2000
1 sentence

2024App. 1992), Riney v. State, 28 S.W.3d 561 (Tex. Crim.

12024–2024
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Cox Texas Newspapers, L.P. green
tex · 2011
1 sentence

2015Id. (citing City of Georgetown, 53 S.W.3d at other law.” Id.FN1 This 1999 amendment was heralded 332).

12015–2015
Rose v. State green
texcrimapp · 1988
1 sentence

1989This is the identical mitigating instruction found in Rose, with the exception that the Rose instruction contained the following introductory clause: “You are further instructed that in determining the punishment in this case,_” Rose, 752 S.W.2d at 554 .

11989–1989

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TX § Tex. Educ. Code § 21.306 (3) TX § Tex. Educ. Code § 21.307 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 35 (1894–2026) NY 16 (1847–2022) IL 11 (1897–2019) MO 10 (1903–2022) GA 10 (1982–2026) PA 9 (1826–2023) TX 8 (1989–2024) FL 8 (1981–2023) WA 6 (2004–2015) LA 6 (1973–2016) CT 4 (1969–2022) MI 4 (1945–2023) TN 4 (1917–1999) MD 4 (1913–2020) NM 3 (2006–2023) KY 3 (1958–2010) WY 3 (2001–2022) NJ 3 (1952–2003) MA 3 (1971–2024) OK 3 (1964–2004) OH 3 (1990–2023) KS 2 (1981–2020) WV 2 (1911–1990) NE 2 (2022–2022) RI 2 (2000–2022) WI 2 (1985–2011) DE 2 (1997–2019) VA 2 (1988–2022) CO 2 (1933–1998) ME 2 (1978–1984) SD 2 (2015–2025) IA 2 (1941–1941)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check