Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Philip v. Stategreen2 sentences2013If Balcazar files an amended motion on this claim, “the postconviction court may again summarily deny the claim if it is once again facially insufficient or if the court attaches portions of the record conclusively refuting his allegations.” Philip v. State, 14 So.3d 1243, 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). 2012If Hayes files an amended motion on this ground, “the postconviction court may again summarily deny the claim if it is once again facially insufficient or if the court attaches portions of the record conclusively refuting his allegations.” Philip v. State, 14 So.3d 1243, 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). | 3 | 3 |
ZANCHEZ v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Zanchez, 84 So. 3d at 467-69 (reversing the denial of the ineffective assistance of counsel claim because the record attachments did not conclusively refute it and remanding for the trial court to strike the claim with leave to amend because it was facially insufficient given that it omitted an allegation of prejudice). | 1 | 1 |
Cherington v. Stategreen1 sentence2010See Cherington v. State, 24 So.3d 658, 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Jackson v. State, 807 So.2d at 686 . | 1 | 1 |
Parsons v. Stategreen1 sentence2009Accordingly, the pertinent part of the order is reversed and this case is remanded with instructions that the trial court strike claim two with leave to amend “in a specified time consistent with parameters identified in Spera.” Parsons v. State, 981 So.2d 1249, 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). | 1 | 1 |
A. I. Gage Plumbing Supply Co. v. Local 300 of International Hod Carriersgreen2 sentences1964Gage Plumbing Supply Company, Inc. v. Local 300 of the International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, 1962, 202 Cal. App.2d 197 , 20 Cal. Rptr. 860 , 92 A.L.R.2d 1223 , an action for injunctive relief by a contractor against a union for breach of contract arising from a strike in violation of a collective bargaining no-strike agreement, the court of that state said: "Defendant appeals primarily on the grounds that the trial court had no jurisdiction to try the action in that the union's conduct amounted to an `unfair labor practice' over which jurisdiction is preemp 1964Gage Plumbing Supply Company, Inc. v. Local 300 of the International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, 1962, 202 Cal. App.2d 197 , 20 Cal. Rptr. 860 , 92 A.L.R.2d 1223 , an action for injunctive relief by a contractor against a union for breach of contract arising from a strike in violation of a collective bargaining no-strike agreement, the court of that state said: "Defendant appeals primarily on the grounds that the trial court had no jurisdiction to try the action in that the union's conduct amounted to an `unfair labor practice' over which jurisdiction is preemp | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Spera v. State
green
1 sentence2019We also reverse the denial of Ground 3 and remand for the court to strike the claim with leave for Appellant to file a facially sufficient claim in accordance with Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Spencer v. State
green
1 sentence2018Specifically, the Second District's rule provides that to preserve the argument that the trial judge erred in allowing the strike after a neutral reason was proffered "the opponent [of a peremptory strike] must expressly make a claim of pretext and at least attempt to proffer the circumstances that support its claim." Spencer v. State , 196 So.3d 400 , 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Jackson v. State
green
1 sentence2010See Cherington v. State, 24 So.3d 658, 661 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Jackson v. State, 807 So.2d at 686 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Radio Corporation of America v. LOCAL 780, ETC.
neutral
1 sentence1973In Radio Corporation of America v. Local 780 International Alliance of Theatrical Employees, AFL-CIO, 160 So.2d 150 (Fla.App.2d, 1964), relied on by the District Court, there was no allegation that the strike enjoined constituted an unfair labor practice as well as a breach of contract. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.