Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1959–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Woodland Hills Education Ass'n v. Woodland Hills School Districtgreen2 sentences2019See Woodland Hills Education Association, PSEA/NEA v. Woodland Hills School District , 96 Pa.Cmwlth. 502 , 508 A.2d 365 , 366 (1986) (court of common pleas considered the school district's declaratory judgment action seeking reimbursement for payments made for benefits paid to teachers during their strike under Section 1006 of the PERA). 2019See Woodland Hills Education Association, PSEA/NEA v. Woodland Hills School District , 96 Pa.Cmwlth. 502 , 508 A.2d 365 , 366 (1986) (court of common pleas considered the school district's declaratory judgment action seeking reimbursement for payments made for benefits paid to teachers during their strike under Section 1006 of the PERA). | 2 | 2 |
McCormick Dray Lines, Inc. v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1985“A claimant whose employment has been interrupted by a work stoppage arising out of a labor dispute bears the burden of .proving that the stoppage resulted from a lockout.” McCormick Dray Lines v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 74 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 181, 184 , 459 A.2d 74, 76 (1983). 1985“A claimant whose employment has been interrupted by a work stoppage arising out of a labor dispute bears the burden of .proving that the stoppage resulted from a lockout.” McCormick Dray Lines v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 74 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 181, 184 , 459 A.2d 74, 76 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Silverman v. POLIS
green
2 sentences1984Silverman v. Polis, 230 Pa.Super. 366 , 326 A.2d 452 (1974). 1984Silverman v. Polis, 230 Pa.Super. 366 , 326 A.2d 452 (1974). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Weimer Unemployment Compensation Case
green
2 sentences1961In Weimer Unemployment Compensation Case, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 348 (allocatur refused, ibid xxvi), 107 A. 2d 607 , in an opinion written by President Judge Rhodes for a unanimous court, it was held that the employes were ineligible for unemployment compensation even though the agreement between the company and the union did not contain a no strike clause. 1961In Weimer Unemployment Compensation Case, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 348 (allocatur refused, ibid xxvi), 107 A. 2d 607 , in an opinion written by President Judge Rhodes for a unanimous court, it was held that the employes were ineligible for unemployment compensation even though the agreement between the company and the union did not contain a no strike clause. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
National Labor Relations Board v. Dorsey Trailers, Inc.
green
1 sentence1959The only limitation upon the right of the employer to discharge an employe is that he may not, under cover of such right, interfere with, restrain or coerce his employes in the exercise of their rights of self-organization and collective bargaining nor discriminate against them because of union activity, in violation of the provisions of the act.” We agree with the employer that the strike was in violation of the collective bargaining agreement and therefore was unprotected activity: National Labor Relations Board v. Reynolds International Pen Co., 162 F. 2d 680 ; National Labor Relations Boar | 1 | 1959–1959 |
United Construction Workers and United Mine Workers of America v. Haislip Baking Company, a Virginia Corporation
green
1 sentence1959In Teamsters v. Mead, 230 F. 2d 576 (1956), Judge Magruder said (pages 583-584) : “As stated by Chief Judge Parker in United Construction Workers v. Haislip Baking Co., 4 Cir., 1955, 223 F. 2d 872, 876-77 , certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 847 , 76 S. Ct. 87 [28 Labor Cases, Para. 69, 316] : ‘It is argued that a strike could not constitute a breach of a contract which did not contain a no strike clause; but we think it clear that the purpose of the contract was to require the settlement of disputes and grievances by a procedure which would not cause a disruption of business that would necessar | 1 | 1959–1959 |
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local Union No. 25, A.F.L. v. W. L. Mead, Inc., (Two Cases)
green
1 sentence1959In Teamsters v. Mead, 230 F. 2d 576 (1956), Judge Magruder said (pages 583-584) : “As stated by Chief Judge Parker in United Construction Workers v. Haislip Baking Co., 4 Cir., 1955, 223 F. 2d 872, 876-77 , certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 847 , 76 S. Ct. 87 [28 Labor Cases, Para. 69, 316] : ‘It is argued that a strike could not constitute a breach of a contract which did not contain a no strike clause; but we think it clear that the purpose of the contract was to require the settlement of disputes and grievances by a procedure which would not cause a disruption of business that would necessar | 1 | 1959–1959 |
National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Manufacturing Co.
green
2 sentences1959Co., 1939, 306 U.S. 332 , 59 S. Ct. 508 , 83 L. 1959Co., 1939, 306 U.S. 332 , 59 S. Ct. 508 , 83 L. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Kaufmann Department Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences1959Stores, Inc., 345 Pa. 398 , 29 A. 2d 90 . 1959Stores, Inc., 345 Pa. 398 , 29 A. 2d 90 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
National Labor Relations Board v. Reynolds International Pen Co.
green
1 sentence1959The only limitation upon the right of the employer to discharge an employe is that he may not, under cover of such right, interfere with, restrain or coerce his employes in the exercise of their rights of self-organization and collective bargaining nor discriminate against them because of union activity, in violation of the provisions of the act.” We agree with the employer that the strike was in violation of the collective bargaining agreement and therefore was unprotected activity: National Labor Relations Board v. Reynolds International Pen Co., 162 F. 2d 680 ; National Labor Relations Boar | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Haislip Baking Co. v. United Construction Workers
green
2 sentences1959In Teamsters v. Mead, 230 F. 2d 576 (1956), Judge Magruder said (pages 583-584) : “As stated by Chief Judge Parker in United Construction Workers v. Haislip Baking Co., 4 Cir., 1955, 223 F. 2d 872, 876-77 , certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 847 , 76 S. Ct. 87 [28 Labor Cases, Para. 69, 316] : ‘It is argued that a strike could not constitute a breach of a contract which did not contain a no strike clause; but we think it clear that the purpose of the contract was to require the settlement of disputes and grievances by a procedure which would not cause a disruption of business that would necessar 1959In Teamsters v. Mead, 230 F. 2d 576 (1956), Judge Magruder said (pages 583-584) : “As stated by Chief Judge Parker in United Construction Workers v. Haislip Baking Co., 4 Cir., 1955, 223 F. 2d 872, 876-77 , certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 847 , 76 S. Ct. 87 [28 Labor Cases, Para. 69, 316] : ‘It is argued that a strike could not constitute a breach of a contract which did not contain a no strike clause; but we think it clear that the purpose of the contract was to require the settlement of disputes and grievances by a procedure which would not cause a disruption of business that would necessar | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.