Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1939–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Urrea v. Flythegreen2 sentences2019See, e.g., Urrea v. Flythe, 215 Ga. App. 212, 213 ( 450 SE2d 266 ) (1994) (reversing and remanding case to the trial court “to determine whether appellant has met the necessary jurisdictional prerequisites for filing a renewal suit”). 2. 2019See, e.g., Urrea v. Flythe, 215 Ga. App. 212, 213 ( 450 SE2d 266 ) (1994) (reversing and remanding case to the trial court “to determine whether appellant has met the necessary jurisdictional prerequisites for filing a renewal suit”). 2. | 1 | 1 |
Bonser v. Shainholtzgreen2 sentences2001Lombard v. Rohrbaugh, 262 Va. 484 ( 551 SE2d 349 ) (2001) (evidence of expert’s employment relationship with defendant’s insurer admissible); Yoho v. Thompson, 345 S.C. 361, 366 ( 548 SE2d 584 ) (2001) (evidence that expert maintained an employment relationship with defendant’s insurer admissible); Bonser v. Shainholtz, 3 P3d 422, 426 (Colo. 2000) (evidence admissible that expert was founder of trust insuring defendant, trust had only 1,500 members and adverse ver diet could substantially affect expert’s premiums); Barsema, 156 Ariz. at 314 (evidence expert was vice president and on board of d 2001Lombard v. Rohrbaugh, 262 Va. 484 , 551 S.E.2d 349 (2001) (evidence of expert's employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Yoho v. Thompson, 345 S.C. 361, 366 , 548 S.E.2d 584 (2001) (evidence that expert maintained an employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Bonser v. Shainholtz, 3 P.3d 422, 426 (Colo.2000) (evidence admissible that expert was founder of trust insuring defendant, trust had only 1,500 members and adverse verdict could substantially affect expert's premiums); Barsema, 156 Ariz. at 314 , 751 P.2d 969 (evidence expert was vice president and | 1 | 1 |
Barsema v. Susonggreen2 sentences2001Lombard v. Rohrbaugh, 262 Va. 484 , 551 S.E.2d 349 (2001) (evidence of expert's employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Yoho v. Thompson, 345 S.C. 361, 366 , 548 S.E.2d 584 (2001) (evidence that expert maintained an employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Bonser v. Shainholtz, 3 P.3d 422, 426 (Colo.2000) (evidence admissible that expert was founder of trust insuring defendant, trust had only 1,500 members and adverse verdict could substantially affect expert's premiums); Barsema, 156 Ariz. at 314 , 751 P.2d 969 (evidence expert was vice president and 2001Lombard v. Rohrbaugh, 262 Va. 484 , 551 S.E.2d 349 (2001) (evidence of expert's employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Yoho v. Thompson, 345 S.C. 361, 366 , 548 S.E.2d 584 (2001) (evidence that expert maintained an employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Bonser v. Shainholtz, 3 P.3d 422, 426 (Colo.2000) (evidence admissible that expert was founder of trust insuring defendant, trust had only 1,500 members and adverse verdict could substantially affect expert's premiums); Barsema, 156 Ariz. at 314 , 751 P.2d 969 (evidence expert was vice president and | 1 | 1 |
Yoho v. Thompsongreen2 sentences2001Lombard v. Rohrbaugh, 262 Va. 484 , 551 S.E.2d 349 (2001) (evidence of expert's employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Yoho v. Thompson, 345 S.C. 361, 366 , 548 S.E.2d 584 (2001) (evidence that expert maintained an employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Bonser v. Shainholtz, 3 P.3d 422, 426 (Colo.2000) (evidence admissible that expert was founder of trust insuring defendant, trust had only 1,500 members and adverse verdict could substantially affect expert's premiums); Barsema, 156 Ariz. at 314 , 751 P.2d 969 (evidence expert was vice president and 2001Lombard v. Rohrbaugh, 262 Va. 484 , 551 S.E.2d 349 (2001) (evidence of expert's employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Yoho v. Thompson, 345 S.C. 361, 366 , 548 S.E.2d 584 (2001) (evidence that expert maintained an employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Bonser v. Shainholtz, 3 P.3d 422, 426 (Colo.2000) (evidence admissible that expert was founder of trust insuring defendant, trust had only 1,500 members and adverse verdict could substantially affect expert's premiums); Barsema, 156 Ariz. at 314 , 751 P.2d 969 (evidence expert was vice president and | 1 | 1 |
Griffin v. Stategreen2 sentences1983See Griffin v. State, 229 Ga. 165 ( 190 SE2d 61 ) (1972); Daniel v. State, 150 Ga. App. 798 ( 258 SE2d 604 ) (1979). 1983See Griffin v. State, 229 Ga. 165 ( 190 SE2d 61 ) (1972); Daniel v. State, 150 Ga. App. 798 ( 258 SE2d 604 ) (1979). | 1 | 1 |
Bugg v. Consolidated Grocery Co.green1 sentence1981See in this connection the exception to the general rule as set forth in Bugg v. Consolidated Grocery Co., 155 Ga. 550, 551 ( 118 SE 56 ). | 1 | 1 |
Hotel Morgan Co. v. Adamsgreen1 sentence1981See in this connection the exception to the general rule as set forth in Bugg v. Consolidated Grocery Co., 155 Ga. 550, 551 ( 118 SE 56 ). | 1 | 1 |
Bell v. Proctorgreen2 sentences1961Bell v. Proctor, 92 Ga. App. 759, 768 ( 90 SE2d 84 ); Walton v. Smith, 43 Ga. App. 308 ( 158 SE 641 ). 1961Bell v. Proctor, 92 Ga. App. 759, 768 ( 90 SE2d 84 ); Walton v. Smith, 43 Ga. App. 308 ( 158 SE 641 ). | 1 | 1 |
Webb v. Stategreen1 sentence1939An interesting discussion of a somewhat similar state of facts will be found in Webb v. State, 11 Ga. App. 850, 852 ( 76 S. E. 990 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lombard v. Rohrbaugh
green
2 sentences2001Lombard v. Rohrbaugh, 262 Va. 484 , 551 S.E.2d 349 (2001) (evidence of expert's employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Yoho v. Thompson, 345 S.C. 361, 366 , 548 S.E.2d 584 (2001) (evidence that expert maintained an employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Bonser v. Shainholtz, 3 P.3d 422, 426 (Colo.2000) (evidence admissible that expert was founder of trust insuring defendant, trust had only 1,500 members and adverse verdict could substantially affect expert's premiums); Barsema, 156 Ariz. at 314 , 751 P.2d 969 (evidence expert was vice president and 2001Lombard v. Rohrbaugh, 262 Va. 484 , 551 S.E.2d 349 (2001) (evidence of expert's employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Yoho v. Thompson, 345 S.C. 361, 366 , 548 S.E.2d 584 (2001) (evidence that expert maintained an employment relationship with defendant's insurer admissible); Bonser v. Shainholtz, 3 P.3d 422, 426 (Colo.2000) (evidence admissible that expert was founder of trust insuring defendant, trust had only 1,500 members and adverse verdict could substantially affect expert's premiums); Barsema, 156 Ariz. at 314 , 751 P.2d 969 (evidence expert was vice president and | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Neil v. Biggers
green
1 sentence1983It is in this connection that the factors constituting the test set forth in Neil v. Biggers, supra, come into play; (1) the witness’ opportunity to view the accused at the time of the offense; (2) the witness’ degree of attention; (3) the accuracy of the witness’ prior description; and (4) the level of certainty of the identification. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Daniel v. State
green
2 sentences1983See Griffin v. State, 229 Ga. 165 ( 190 SE2d 61 ) (1972); Daniel v. State, 150 Ga. App. 798 ( 258 SE2d 604 ) (1979). 1983See Griffin v. State, 229 Ga. 165 ( 190 SE2d 61 ) (1972); Daniel v. State, 150 Ga. App. 798 ( 258 SE2d 604 ) (1979). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Bailey v. State
green
2 sentences1962Bailey v. State, 210 Ga. 52 (1a) ( 77 SE2d 511 ). 1962Bailey v. State, 210 Ga. 52 (1a) ( 77 SE2d 511 ). | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Walton v. Smith
neutral
2 sentences1961Bell v. Proctor, 92 Ga. App. 759, 768 ( 90 SE2d 84 ); Walton v. Smith, 43 Ga. App. 308 ( 158 SE 641 ). 1961Bell v. Proctor, 92 Ga. App. 759, 768 ( 90 SE2d 84 ); Walton v. Smith, 43 Ga. App. 308 ( 158 SE 641 ). | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Davis v. State
green
1 sentence1943In Davis v. State, 190 Ga. 100 (supra), a full-bench decision, where it was held that the charge on delusional insanity had properly been given, an examination of the record shows that the charge-there given, with the same clarifying explanation in the same connection with the instruction complained of, was, as in the instant case, substantially identical with the charge in the Caison case. (5) With regard to the second contention by counsel for the defendant, that in order to constitute a good defense with respect to delusional insanity the act itself must have been connected with such a delu | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.