8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1906–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Saturday v. Saturdaygreen2 sentences2010See generally Carter v. Carter, 244 Ga. 670, 671 (1) ( 261 SE2d 619 ) (1979); Seaman v. Ratteree, 231 Ga. 482, 484 ( 202 SE2d 454 ) (1973); Saturday v. Saturday, 224 Ga. 236, 239 ( 161 SE2d 509 ) (1968); Cincinnati Ins. 2010See generally Carter v. Carter, 244 Ga. 670, 671 (1) ( 261 SE2d 619 ) (1979); Seaman v. Ratteree, 231 Ga. 482, 484 ( 202 SE2d 454 ) (1973); Saturday v. Saturday, 224 Ga. 236, 239 ( 161 SE2d 509 ) (1968); Cincinnati Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Carter v. Cartergreen2 sentences2010See generally Carter v. Carter, 244 Ga. 670, 671 (1) ( 261 SE2d 619 ) (1979); Seaman v. Ratteree, 231 Ga. 482, 484 ( 202 SE2d 454 ) (1973); Saturday v. Saturday, 224 Ga. 236, 239 ( 161 SE2d 509 ) (1968); Cincinnati Ins. 2010See generally Carter v. Carter, 244 Ga. 670, 671 (1) ( 261 SE2d 619 ) (1979); Seaman v. Ratteree, 231 Ga. 482, 484 ( 202 SE2d 454 ) (1973); Saturday v. Saturday, 224 Ga. 236, 239 ( 161 SE2d 509 ) (1968); Cincinnati Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Imperial Massage & Health Studio, Inc. v. Leegreen1 sentence2010See generally Carter v. Carter, 244 Ga. 670, 671 (1) ( 261 SE2d 619 ) (1979); Seaman v. Ratteree, 231 Ga. 482, 484 ( 202 SE2d 454 ) (1973); Saturday v. Saturday, 224 Ga. 236, 239 ( 161 SE2d 509 ) (1968); Cincinnati Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Bryson v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See Bryson v. State, 282 Ga. App. 36, 41 (3) ( 638 SE2d 181 ) (2006). 2007See Bryson v. State, 282 Ga. App. 36, 41 (3) ( 638 SE2d 181 ) (2006). | 1 | 1 |
Ward v. Wardgreen1 sentence2004See Ward v. Ward, supra, 261 Ga. 659 . | 1 | 1 |
Green v. Farrar Lumber Co.green2 sentences1990This construction of the act requires that materialmen and laborers must be paid to the extent of the contract price; that whenever a materialman or laborer presents a claim within the time he would be compelled to file and record his lien, the discharge of his claim by the contractor will protect the owner to this extent against unsatisfied claims of other materialmen and laborers; but that where claims of liens have been duly recorded, payments made to other materialmen and laborers with the money of the owner will be no reply to the claims of such materialmen or laborers so recording their 1990This construction of the act requires that materialmen and laborers must be paid to the extent of the contract price; that whenever a materialman or laborer presents a claim within the time he would be compelled to file and record his lien, the discharge of his claim by the contractor will protect the owner to this extent against unsatisfied claims of other materialmen and laborers; but that where claims of liens have been duly recorded, payments made to other materialmen and laborers with the money of the owner will be no reply to the claims of such materialmen or laborers so recording their | 1 | 1 |
National Linen Service Corp. v. Clowergreen2 sentences1939The case differs from Burney v. Ryle, 91 Ga. 701 ( 17 S. E. 986 ), and Hammond v. Georgian Co., 133 Ga. 1 ( 65 S. E. 124 ), in which there was no covenant not to work for another person, which distinction was pointed out in National Linen Service Corporation v. Clower, 179 Ga. 136, 146 ( 175 S. E. 460 ). 1939The case differs from Burney v. Ryle, 91 Ga. 701 ( 17 S. E. 986 ), and Hammond v. Georgian Co., 133 Ga. 1 ( 65 S. E. 124 ), in which there was no covenant not to work for another person, which distinction was pointed out in National Linen Service Corporation v. Clower, 179 Ga. 136, 146 ( 175 S. E. 460 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Seaman v. Ratteree
green
1 sentence2010See generally Carter v. Carter, 244 Ga. 670, 671 (1) ( 261 SE2d 619 ) (1979); Seaman v. Ratteree, 231 Ga. 482, 484 ( 202 SE2d 454 ) (1973); Saturday v. Saturday, 224 Ga. 236, 239 ( 161 SE2d 509 ) (1968); Cincinnati Ins. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Mitchell v. Holden
green
2 sentences1976Mitchell v. Holden, 58 Ga. App. 712 (3) ( 199 SE 835 ). 1976Mitchell v. Holden, 58 Ga. App. 712 (3) ( 199 SE 835 ). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Burney v. Ryle & Co.
green
2 sentences1939The case differs from Burney v. Ryle, 91 Ga. 701 ( 17 S. E. 986 ), and Hammond v. Georgian Co., 133 Ga. 1 ( 65 S. E. 124 ), in which there was no covenant not to work for another person, which distinction was pointed out in National Linen Service Corporation v. Clower, 179 Ga. 136, 146 ( 175 S. E. 460 ). 1939The case differs from Burney v. Ryle, 91 Ga. 701 ( 17 S. E. 986 ), and Hammond v. Georgian Co., 133 Ga. 1 ( 65 S. E. 124 ), in which there was no covenant not to work for another person, which distinction was pointed out in National Linen Service Corporation v. Clower, 179 Ga. 136, 146 ( 175 S. E. 460 ). | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Hammond v. Georgian Co.
green
2 sentences1939The case differs from Burney v. Ryle, 91 Ga. 701 ( 17 S. E. 986 ), and Hammond v. Georgian Co., 133 Ga. 1 ( 65 S. E. 124 ), in which there was no covenant not to work for another person, which distinction was pointed out in National Linen Service Corporation v. Clower, 179 Ga. 136, 146 ( 175 S. E. 460 ). 1939The case differs from Burney v. Ryle, 91 Ga. 701 ( 17 S. E. 986 ), and Hammond v. Georgian Co., 133 Ga. 1 ( 65 S. E. 124 ), in which there was no covenant not to work for another person, which distinction was pointed out in National Linen Service Corporation v. Clower, 179 Ga. 136, 146 ( 175 S. E. 460 ). | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Hamilton v. Reynolds
neutral
1 sentence1907A similar decision was rendered in Hamilton v. Reynolds, 88 Ind. 191 . | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Matthews v. Kennedy
green
1 sentence1906Baker v. Baker, supra. Judgment affirmed. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.