may deny hearing (Hawaii) · Go Syfert
← Hawaii issues

may deny hearing in Hawaii

10 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2026 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Allenred
hawapp · 1987 · cited in 2 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2004–2026
2 sentences

2026"The question on appeal of a denial of a Rule 40 petition without a hearing is whether the trial record indicates that Petitioner's application for relief made such a showing of a colorable claim as to require a hearing before the lower court." Dan v. State, 76 Hawaiʻi 423, 427, 879 P.2d 528, 532 (1994) (emphasis omitted) (quoting State v. Allen, 7 Haw.

2026"The question on appeal of a denial of a Rule 40 petition without a hearing is whether the trial record indicates that Petitioner's application for relief made such a showing of a colorable claim as to require a hearing before the lower court." Dan v. State, 76 Hawaiʻi 423, 427, 879 P.2d 528, 532 (1994) (emphasis omitted) (quoting State v. Allen, 7 Haw.

22
Dan v. Stategreen
haw · 1994 · cited in 2 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2005–2026
2 sentences

2005However, as previously mentioned, pursuant to HRPP Rule 40(f), “the court may deny a hearing if the petitioner’s claim is patently frivolous and is mthout trace of support either in the record or from other evidence submitted by the petitioner.” (Emphasis added.) Moreover, “[w]here examination of the record of the trial court proceedings indicates that the petitioner’s allegations show no colorable claim, it is not error to deny the petition without a hearing.” Dan, 76 Hawai'i at 427 , 879 P.2d at 532 .

2005However, as previously mentioned, pursuant to HRPP Rule 40(f), “the court may deny a hearing if the petitioner’s claim is patently frivolous and is mthout trace of support either in the record or from other evidence submitted by the petitioner.” (Emphasis added.) Moreover, “[w]here examination of the record of the trial court proceedings indicates that the petitioner’s allegations show no colorable claim, it is not error to deny the petition without a hearing.” Dan, 76 Hawai'i at 427 , 879 P.2d at 532 .

12
State v. Salavea.green
haw · 2020 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
2 sentences

2026The court may also deny a hearing on a specific question of fact when a full and fair evidentiary hearing upon that question was held during the course of the proceedings which led to the judgment or custody which is the subject of the petition or at any later proceeding. 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER "Under article I, section 14 of the Hawai i Constitution and the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, defendants in criminal cases are provided with the right to the effective assistance of counsel at trial." State v. Salavea, 147 Hawai i 564,

2026The court may also deny a hearing on a specific question of fact when a full and fair evidentiary hearing upon that question was held during the course of the proceedings which led to the judgment or custody which is the subject of the petition or at any later proceeding. 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER "Under article I, section 14 of the Hawai i Constitution and the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, defendants in criminal cases are provided with the right to the effective assistance of counsel at trial." State v. Salavea, 147 Hawai i 564,

11
State v. Smithgreen
haw · 1986 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
2 sentences

2022Whether trial counsel was ineffective for not pursuing questions about Lyle's septic knee should be addressed in an HRPP Rule 40 proceeding Next, McQueen argues her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to inquire about Lyle's septic knee as an "alternative theory for the source of [Lyle's] knife wound[,]" considering the possible symptoms of being septic.14 While "matters presumably within the judgment of counsel, like trial strategy, 'will rarely be second-guessed by judicial hindsight[,]'" State v. Smith, 68 Haw. 304, 311 , 712 P.2d 496, 501 (1986), as amended Jan. 14, 1986, where the r

2022Whether trial counsel was ineffective for not pursuing questions about Lyle's septic knee should be addressed in an HRPP Rule 40 proceeding Next, McQueen argues her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to inquire about Lyle's septic knee as an "alternative theory for the source of [Lyle's] knife wound[,]" considering the possible symptoms of being septic.14 While "matters presumably within the judgment of counsel, like trial strategy, 'will rarely be second-guessed by judicial hindsight[,]'" State v. Smith, 68 Haw. 304, 311 , 712 P.2d 496, 501 (1986), as amended Jan. 14, 1986, where the r

11
United States v. William B. Prince, Jr.green
ca5 · 1989 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018The court may also deny a hearing on a specific question of fact when a full and fair evidentiary hearing upon that 5 The exceptional circumstances test in Christian provided: The sufficiency of an indictment or information is not open to collateral attack after conviction unless it appears that the circumstances are exceptional, that the questions raised are of "large importance," that the need for the remedy sought is apparent, and that the offense charged was one of which the sentencing court manifestly had no jurisdiction. 131 Hawai‘i at 163, 315 P.3d at 789 (quoting United States v. Princ

11
George W. Nulph v. Dave Cook, Director of the Department of Corrections Hardy Myers, Attorney General of the State of Oregongreen
ca9 · 2003 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012In Nulph, 333 F.3d at 1053-56, 1058 , the court held that the Pearce presumption of vindictiveness applied where the Oregon State Board of Parole (Board) increased the defendant's minimum term of imprisonment from 30 years to 75 years after the defendant had successfully attacked the previous minimum term set by the Board. 5 .

11
State v. Lewisgreen
hawapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995Although court records in other cases are not part of the record on appeal, Orso v. City and County of Honolulu, 55 Haw. 37, 38 , 514 P.2d 859, 860 (1973); see State v. Lewis, 6 Haw.App. 624, 626 , 736 P.2d 70, 72 (1987), we may take judicial notice of them.

1995Although court records in other cases are not part of the record on appeal, Orso v. City and County of Honolulu, 55 Haw. 37, 38 , 514 P.2d 859, 860 (1973); see State v. Lewis, 6 Haw.App. 624, 626 , 736 P.2d 70, 72 (1987), we may take judicial notice of them.

11
Orso v. City and County of Honolulugreen
haw · 1973 · cited in 1 Hawaii opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995Although court records in other cases are not part of the record on appeal, Orso v. City and County of Honolulu, 55 Haw. 37, 38 , 514 P.2d 859, 860 (1973); see State v. Lewis, 6 Haw.App. 624, 626 , 736 P.2d 70, 72 (1987), we may take judicial notice of them.

1995Although court records in other cases are not part of the record on appeal, Orso v. City and County of Honolulu, 55 Haw. 37, 38 , 514 P.2d 859, 860 (1973); see State v. Lewis, 6 Haw.App. 624, 626 , 736 P.2d 70, 72 (1987), we may take judicial notice of them.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Akau v. State green
haw · 2019
2 sentences

2021In Akau v. State, 144 Hawaiʻi 159, 439 P.3d 111 (2019), we held the doctrine of laches did not apply in the context of HRPP Rule 40 proceedings, observing HRPP Rule 40 lacked a statute of limitations for bringing post-conviction petitions. 144 Hawaiʻi at 162, 439 P.3d at 114 .

2021In Akau v. State, 144 Hawaiʻi 159, 439 P.3d 111 (2019), we held the doctrine of laches did not apply in the context of HRPP Rule 40 proceedings, observing HRPP Rule 40 lacked a statute of limitations for bringing post-conviction petitions. 144 Hawaiʻi at 162, 439 P.3d at 114 .

12021–2021
State v. Hussein. green
haw · 2010
1 sentence

2019Id. 10 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** favor.

12019–2019
Christian v. State. red
hawapp · 2013
1 sentence

2018The court may also deny a hearing on a specific question of fact when a full and fair evidentiary hearing upon that 5 The exceptional circumstances test in Christian provided: The sufficiency of an indictment or information is not open to collateral attack after conviction unless it appears that the circumstances are exceptional, that the questions raised are of "large importance," that the need for the remedy sought is apparent, and that the offense charged was one of which the sentencing court manifestly had no jurisdiction. 131 Hawai‘i at 163, 315 P.3d at 789 (quoting United States v. Princ

12018–2018
Stanley v. State green
haw · 1994
2 sentences

2004In Stanley v. State, 76 Hawai'i 446 , 879 P.2d 551 (1994), the supreme court reiterated the general rule governing hearings on HRPP Rule 40 petitions that we announced in State v. Allen, 7 Haw.App. 89, 92-93 , 744 P.2d 789, 792-93 (1987): As a general rule, a hearing should be held on a Rule 40 petition for post-conviction relief where the petition states a colorable claim.

2004In Stanley v. State, 76 Hawai'i 446 , 879 P.2d 551 (1994), the supreme court reiterated the general rule governing hearings on HRPP Rule 40 petitions that we announced in State v. Allen, 7 Haw.App. 89, 92-93 , 744 P.2d 789, 792-93 (1987): As a general rule, a hearing should be held on a Rule 40 petition for post-conviction relief where the petition states a colorable claim.

12004–2004

Where else courts name it

IL 16 (2012–2025) PA 11 (1970–2023) HI 10 (1995–2026) MS 5 (2007–2017) CO 3 (2014–2025) OH 3 (1994–1999) AK 2 (2007–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check