Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1863–1989 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Farmers Savings Bank of Shelby v. Pomeroygreen2 sentences1989Bank v. Pomeroy, 211 Iowa 337, 338 , 233 N.W. 488, 489 (1930), stated: The right of the plaintiff in a foreclosure action, when such is permissible, to the appointment of a receiver, is a part of the remedy in equity for the satisfaction of his claim. 1989Bank v. Pomeroy, 211 Iowa 337, 338 , 233 N.W. 488, 489 (1930), stated: The right of the plaintiff in a foreclosure action, when such is permissible, to the appointment of a receiver, is a part of the remedy in equity for the satisfaction of his claim. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mitchell v. Vest
green
2 sentences1941In Mitchell v. Vest, 157 Iowa 336 , 136 N. W. 1054 , the opinion states on page 346 of 157 Iowa, page 1057 of 136 N. W.: “The doctrine of satisfaction, as applied to cases arising under wills, can ordinarily .be applied only when the legacy given by the debtor to the creditor is equal to or greater in amount than the debt, and it must be not only equal in amount, but equally beneficial, and of the same nature exactly. 1941In Mitchell v. Vest, 157 Iowa 336 , 136 N. W. 1054 , the opinion states on page 346 of 157 Iowa, page 1057 of 136 N. W.: “The doctrine of satisfaction, as applied to cases arising under wills, can ordinarily .be applied only when the legacy given by the debtor to the creditor is equal to or greater in amount than the debt, and it must be not only equal in amount, but equally beneficial, and of the same nature exactly. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Bank of Mendon v. Mell
green
1 sentence1931“As the creditor holding a waiver may proceed to assert his right in a state tribunal pending the proceedings in bankruptcy, it follows that the form his action may take in the state tribunal is of no concern in the bankruptcy court, unless such writs are issued and proceedings had as directly interfere with property passing to the trustee in bankruptcy, or with exempt property not claimed by the bankrupt and in actual custody of the bankruptcy court. * * * Whether the bankrupt could avoid or defeat such contracts was for the state courts to decide, and the issue seems to us to be wholly immat | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Bridgman & Co. v. McKissick
neutral
1 sentence1929The plaintiff thereby had a superior claim to that of any creditor, “whether senior or junior,” because he was the first to “commence his equitable proceeding to reach and subject the property to execution,” obtaining thereby “not only a specific lien which will arrest and control the alienation thereof, but which will give him a superior equity on the same for the satisfaction of his claim.” Bridgman & Co. v. McKissick, supra. It may be observed at this point, under the facts of the case at bar, that the defendant Wayland A. Hopley was, as an individual, the owner, as an assignee, of a judgme | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Ryan v. Becker
neutral
1 sentence1921In Byan v. Becker, 136 Iowa 273 , Becker sued Byan for damages on account of an alleged tort, and recovered judgment. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Wagner v. Union Stock Yards & Transit Co.
neutral
1 sentence1907Sieber v. Amunson, 78 Wis. 679 ( 47 N. W. 1126 ); Wagner v. Union Stockyards & Transit Co., 41 Ill. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Sieber v. Amunson
neutral
2 sentences1907Sieber v. Amunson, 78 Wis. 679 ( 47 N. W. 1126 ); Wagner v. Union Stockyards & Transit Co., 41 Ill. 1907Sieber v. Amunson, 78 Wis. 679 ( 47 N. W. 1126 ); Wagner v. Union Stockyards & Transit Co., 41 Ill. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Edmeston v. Lyde
green
1 sentence1863The following are some of the authorities which will sustain the above rule: Edmeston and Riddle, Exrs., v. Lyde et al., 1 Paige, 637 ; Corning & Norton v. White, 2 Paige, 567 ; Burral et al. v. Leslie et al., 6 Id., 445; Gorden v. Lovel, 21 Me., 251; Miers & Coulson v. The Zanesville and Maysville Turnpike Co., 13 Ohio, 197; Eaton v. Patterson, 2 Stew. & Port., 9; Hendricks v. Robinson et al., 2 John. | 1 | 1863–1863 |
Corning & Norton v. White
green
1 sentence1863The following are some of the authorities which will sustain the above rule: Edmeston and Riddle, Exrs., v. Lyde et al., 1 Paige, 637 ; Corning & Norton v. White, 2 Paige, 567 ; Burral et al. v. Leslie et al., 6 Id., 445; Gorden v. Lovel, 21 Me., 251; Miers & Coulson v. The Zanesville and Maysville Turnpike Co., 13 Ohio, 197; Eaton v. Patterson, 2 Stew. & Port., 9; Hendricks v. Robinson et al., 2 John. | 1 | 1863–1863 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.