Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Roberto Rodriguezgreen2 sentences2021See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez, 831 F.2d 162, 166 (7th Cir. 1987) (applying doctrine where local officer conducting - 11 - No. 1-19-0459 traffic stop at DEA’s request knew nothing about factual basis for agency’s suspicion); United States v. Celio, 945 F.2d 180, 183 (7th Cir. 1991) (applying doctrine where local officers who stopped and searched vehicle at DEA’s request knew only “bald assertion *** that [its agents] suspected drug trafficking.”). ¶ 38 Because we have found probable cause to arrest, we assume (because Spencer does not dispute) that police properly impounded the Mazda an 2020See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez, 831 F.2d 162, 166 (7th Cir. 1987) (applying doctrine where local officer conducting traffic stop at DEA’s request knew nothing about factual basis for DEA’s suspicion); United States v. Celio, 945 F.2d 180, 183 (7th Cir. 1991) (applying doctrine where local officers who stopped and searched vehicle at DEA’s request knew only “bald assertion *** that [its agents] suspected drug trafficking.”). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Lino A. Celiogreen2 sentences2021See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez, 831 F.2d 162, 166 (7th Cir. 1987) (applying doctrine where local officer conducting - 11 - No. 1-19-0459 traffic stop at DEA’s request knew nothing about factual basis for agency’s suspicion); United States v. Celio, 945 F.2d 180, 183 (7th Cir. 1991) (applying doctrine where local officers who stopped and searched vehicle at DEA’s request knew only “bald assertion *** that [its agents] suspected drug trafficking.”). ¶ 38 Because we have found probable cause to arrest, we assume (because Spencer does not dispute) that police properly impounded the Mazda an 2020See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez, 831 F.2d 162, 166 (7th Cir. 1987) (applying doctrine where local officer conducting traffic stop at DEA’s request knew nothing about factual basis for DEA’s suspicion); United States v. Celio, 945 F.2d 180, 183 (7th Cir. 1991) (applying doctrine where local officers who stopped and searched vehicle at DEA’s request knew only “bald assertion *** that [its agents] suspected drug trafficking.”). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Roy W. Nafzgergreen2 sentences2021Id. at 252-253 . (citing United States v. Nafzger, 974 F.2d 906, 911 (7th Cir. 1992)). 2020Id. at 252-253 . (citing United States v. Nafzger, 974 F.2d 906, 911 (7th Cir. 1992)). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Robert Paul Kaplanskygreen2 sentences2007See United States v. Fernandez-Castillo, 324 F.3d 1114, 1118 (9th Cir. 2003); United States v. Kaplansky, 42 F.3d 320, 327 (6th Cir. 1994); United States v. Cutchin, 956 F.2d 1216, 1217-18 (D.C. 2007See United States v. Fernandez-Castillo, 324 F.3d 1114, 1118 (9th Cir. 2003); United States v. Kaplansky, 42 F.3d 320, 327 (6th Cir. 1994); United States v. Cutchin, 956 F.2d 1216, 1217-18 (D.C. | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Anthony Cutchingreen2 sentences2007See United States v. Fernandez-Castillo, 324 F.3d 1114, 1118 (9th Cir. 2003); United States v. Kaplansky, 42 F.3d 320, 327 (6th Cir. 1994); United States v. Cutchin, 956 F.2d 1216, 1217-18 (D.C. 2007See United States v. Fernandez-Castillo, 324 F.3d 1114, 1118 (9th Cir. 2003); United States v. Kaplansky, 42 F.3d 320, 327 (6th Cir. 1994); United States v. Cutchin, 956 F.2d 1216, 1217-18 (D.C. | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Rigoberto Fernandez-Castillogreen2 sentences2007See United States v. Fernandez-Castillo, 324 F.3d 1114, 1118 (9th Cir. 2003); United States v. Kaplansky, 42 F.3d 320, 327 (6th Cir. 1994); United States v. Cutchin, 956 F.2d 1216, 1217-18 (D.C. 2007See United States v. Fernandez-Castillo, 324 F.3d 1114, 1118 (9th Cir. 2003); United States v. Kaplansky, 42 F.3d 320, 327 (6th Cir. 1994); United States v. Cutchin, 956 F.2d 1216, 1217-18 (D.C. | 2 | 2 |
cluster 431092green1 sentence2026See United States v. Rubio, 727 F.2d 786, 797 (9th Cir. 1983) (“We are unpersuaded that a consent search may be validly qualified by the number of officers allowed to search, and we so hold.”); cf. People v. Whiles, 2024 IL App (4th) 231086, ¶¶ 29-37 (discussing United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221 (1985) and applying the collective knowledge doctrine to hold that one officer’s knowledge was collectively imputed to another officer to support probable cause). ¶ 41 Finally, the record does not support a subsequent revocation of the consent given. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Whilesgreen1 sentence2026See United States v. Rubio, 727 F.2d 786, 797 (9th Cir. 1983) (“We are unpersuaded that a consent search may be validly qualified by the number of officers allowed to search, and we so hold.”); cf. People v. Whiles, 2024 IL App (4th) 231086, ¶¶ 29-37 (discussing United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221 (1985) and applying the collective knowledge doctrine to hold that one officer’s knowledge was collectively imputed to another officer to support probable cause). ¶ 41 Finally, the record does not support a subsequent revocation of the consent given. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Fonnergreen1 sentence2023App. 3d 585, 593 (2007); see also People v. Fonner, 385 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ewinggreen2 sentences2023Further, pursuant to the collective knowledge doctrine, “information known to all of the police officers acting in concert can be examined when determining whether the officer initiating the stop had reasonable suspicion to justify a Terry stop.” People v. Ewing, 377 Ill. 2023See Ewing, 377 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Bussgreen1 sentence2023See, e.g., People v. Buss, 187 Ill. 2d 144, 204 (1999) (officers may rely - 11 - No. 1-20-0936 on each other’s collective knowledge to establish probable cause); Hensley, 469 U.S. at 230-32 . ¶ 41 Neither petitioner nor the Bass majority (nor Smith following it) claims that the alleged constitutional problem with arrests based on investigative alerts results from the application of the collective-knowledge doctrine in this context. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Hensley
green
2 sentences2026See United States v. Rubio, 727 F.2d 786, 797 (9th Cir. 1983) (“We are unpersuaded that a consent search may be validly qualified by the number of officers allowed to search, and we so hold.”); cf. People v. Whiles, 2024 IL App (4th) 231086, ¶¶ 29-37 (discussing United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221 (1985) and applying the collective knowledge doctrine to hold that one officer’s knowledge was collectively imputed to another officer to support probable cause). ¶ 41 Finally, the record does not support a subsequent revocation of the consent given. 2024In an era when criminal suspects are increasingly mobile and increasingly likely to flee across jurisdictional boundaries, this rule is a matter of common sense: it minimizes the volume of information concerning suspects that must be transmitted to other - 13 - jurisdictions and enables police in one jurisdiction to act promptly in reliance on information from another jurisdiction.” Id. at 231 . ¶ 35 The Supreme Court in Hensley anticipated an objection to using this collective- knowledge principle from Whiteley: in Whiteley, there was a warrant, whereas in Hensley, there was no warrant. | 5 | 2020–2026 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.