Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1965–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hill v. Cowangreen2 sentences2016Quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002), and United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987), the State relies on the long-accepted principle that a statute is facially unconstitutional “only if ‘no set of circumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid.’ ” (Emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted.) The State’s argument, however, is misplaced. ¶ 27 In Patel, 576 U.S. at ___, 135 S. Ct. at 2451 , the United States Supreme Court explained the proper analysis for facial challenges: “Under the most exacting standard the Court has prescribed for facial challenges, 2015Quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002), and United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987), the State relies on the long-accepted principle that a statute is facially unconstitutional “only if ‘no set of circumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid.’ ” (Emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted.) The State’s argument, however, is misplaced. ¶ 27 In Patel, 576 U.S. at ___, 135 S. Ct. at 2451 , the United States Supreme Court explained the proper analysis for facial challenges: “Under the most exacting standard the Court has prescribed for facial challenges, | 2 | 2 |
Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Partygreen2 sentences2016Quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002), and United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987), the State relies on the long-accepted principle that a statute is facially unconstitutional “only if ‘no set of circumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid.’ ” (Emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted.) The State’s argument, however, is misplaced. ¶ 27 In Patel, 576 U.S. at ___, 135 S. Ct. at 2451 , the United States Supreme Court explained the proper analysis for facial challenges: “Under the most exacting standard the Court has prescribed for facial challenges, 2015Quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002), and United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987), the State relies on the long-accepted principle that a statute is facially unconstitutional “only if ‘no set of circumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid.’ ” (Emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted.) The State’s argument, however, is misplaced. ¶ 27 In Patel, 576 U.S. at ___, 135 S. Ct. at 2451 , the United States Supreme Court explained the proper analysis for facial challenges: “Under the most exacting standard the Court has prescribed for facial challenges, | 2 | 2 |
Roseboom v. Whittakergreen1 sentence2012See Atwater v. American Exchange National Bank of Chicago, 152 Ill. 605, 617-18 (1894); Roseboom v. Whittaker, 132 Ill. 81, 89 (1890). | 1 | 1 |
Atwater v. American Exchange Nat. Bankgreen1 sentence2012See Atwater v. American Exchange National Bank of Chicago, 152 Ill. 605, 617-18 (1894); Roseboom v. Whittaker, 132 Ill. 81, 89 (1890). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Therriaultgreen1 sentence1978See also People v. Therriault (1976), 42 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Salerno
green
2 sentences2016Quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002), and United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987), the State relies on the long-accepted principle that a statute is facially unconstitutional “only if ‘no set of circumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid.’ ” (Emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted.) The State’s argument, however, is misplaced. ¶ 27 In Patel, 576 U.S. at ___, 135 S. Ct. at 2451 , the United States Supreme Court explained the proper analysis for facial challenges: “Under the most exacting standard the Court has prescribed for facial challenges, 2015Quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002), and United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987), the State relies on the long-accepted principle that a statute is facially unconstitutional “only if ‘no set of circumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid.’ ” (Emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted.) The State’s argument, however, is misplaced. ¶ 27 In Patel, 576 U.S. at ___, 135 S. Ct. at 2451 , the United States Supreme Court explained the proper analysis for facial challenges: “Under the most exacting standard the Court has prescribed for facial challenges, | 2 | 2015–2016 |
City of L. A. v. Patel
green
2 sentences2016Quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002), and United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987), the State relies on the long-accepted principle that a statute is facially unconstitutional “only if ‘no set of circumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid.’ ” (Emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted.) The State’s argument, however, is misplaced. ¶ 27 In Patel, 576 U.S. at ___, 135 S. Ct. at 2451 , the United States Supreme Court explained the proper analysis for facial challenges: “Under the most exacting standard the Court has prescribed for facial challenges, 2015Quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002), and United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 745 (1987), the State relies on the long-accepted principle that a statute is facially unconstitutional “only if ‘no set of circumstances exists under which the [statute] would be valid.’ ” (Emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted.) The State’s argument, however, is misplaced. ¶ 27 In Patel, 576 U.S. at ___, 135 S. Ct. at 2451 , the United States Supreme Court explained the proper analysis for facial challenges: “Under the most exacting standard the Court has prescribed for facial challenges, | 2 | 2015–2016 |
People v. Burns
green
1 sentence2025In making that argument, the State “relie[d] on the long-accepted principle that a statute [was] facially unconstitutional only if no set of circumstances exist[ed] under which the [statute] would be valid.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Newbern
green
2 sentences1979App. 3d 532, 540 , 310 N.E.2d 42, 48 . 1979In the Newbem case the reviewing court reiterated the long-accepted rule of law that the issue of credibility is for the trier of fact and the reviewing court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial judge. ( 18 Ill. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1978In a situation of this type we are obliged to follow the long accepted principle that, “There is no obligation on a trial court to believe alibi testimony over positive identification of an accused, even though given by a greater number of witnesses.” People v. Jackson (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 143, 149 , 295 N.E.2d 462 , citing People v. Catlett (1971), 48 Ill. 2d 56, 64 , 268 N.E.2d 378 . 1978In a situation of this type we are obliged to follow the long accepted principle that, “There is no obligation on a trial court to believe alibi testimony over positive identification of an accused, even though given by a greater number of witnesses.” People v. Jackson (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 143, 149 , 295 N.E.2d 462 , citing People v. Catlett (1971), 48 Ill. 2d 56, 64 , 268 N.E.2d 378 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
The PEOPLE v. Catlett
green
2 sentences1978In a situation of this type we are obliged to follow the long accepted principle that, “There is no obligation on a trial court to believe alibi testimony over positive identification of an accused, even though given by a greater number of witnesses.” People v. Jackson (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 143, 149 , 295 N.E.2d 462 , citing People v. Catlett (1971), 48 Ill. 2d 56, 64 , 268 N.E.2d 378 . 1978In a situation of this type we are obliged to follow the long accepted principle that, “There is no obligation on a trial court to believe alibi testimony over positive identification of an accused, even though given by a greater number of witnesses.” People v. Jackson (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 143, 149 , 295 N.E.2d 462 , citing People v. Catlett (1971), 48 Ill. 2d 56, 64 , 268 N.E.2d 378 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
In Re Estate of Phillips
green
2 sentences1974In In Re Estate of Phillips, 1 Ill.App.3d 813 , 275 N.E.2d 685 , the issue- we face is fuUy discussed and follows this long accepted rule. 1974In In Re Estate of Phillips, 1 Ill.App.3d 813 , 275 N.E.2d 685 , the issue- we face is fuUy discussed and follows this long accepted rule. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Frank v. Salomon
neutral
1 sentence1965Frank v. Salomon, 376 Ill 439, 34 NE2d 424 . | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.