somewhat different analysis (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

somewhat different analysis in Illinois

8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1924–2005 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. green
scotus · 2002
2 sentences

2005Ed. 2d at 680 , 122 S. Ct. at 1733 , adhered to the test as set forth in City of Renton , Justice Kennedy concurred and set forth a somewhat different analysis.

2005Ed. 2d at 680 , 122 S. Ct. at 1733 , adhered to the test as set forth in City of Renton, Justice Kennedy concurred and set forth a somewhat different analysis.

22005–2005
King General Contractors, Inc. v. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints green
mo · 1991
2 sentences

2000King General Contractors, Inc. , 821 S.W.2d at 500-01 .

2000King General Contractors, Inc., 821 S.W.2d at 500-01 .

22000–2000
Chicago Bar Ass'n v. State Board of Elections green
ill · 1990
1 sentence

1992App. 3d 496 ; Chicago Bar Association v. State Board of Elections (1990), 137 Ill. 2d 394 .) Considering, for example, the possibility that the presentation of a referendum might create the expense of an additional election, a possibility that does not exist in the case of naming a candidate on a scheduled ballot, we find both a significant difference between these two categories of cases and a proper basis for a somewhat different analysis regarding placing of referenda.

11992–1992
In Re Marriage of Petramale green
illappct · 1981
1 sentence

1984The court also noted that “the duration of the appellate process requires that petitioners have a forum available at all times in which support matters may be determined.” 102 Ill.

11984–1984
Widicus v. Southwestern Electric Cooperative, Inc. green
illappct · 1960
1 sentence

1977In Sentry Royalty Co. this court cited Widicus v. Southwestern Electric Cooperative, 26 Ill.

11977–1977
Warfield-Pratt-Howell Co. v. Williamson green
ill · 1908
1 sentence

1924“If the remedy in equity is more adequate because of some special circumstance of the situation, the jurisdiction of equity will be sustained. ’ ’ (Warfield-Howell Co. v. Williamson, 233 Ill. 487, 497 .) In Rago v. Village of Melrose Park, 161 Ill.

11924–1924
Rago v. Village of Melrose Park neutral
illappct · 1911
1 sentence

1924“If the remedy in equity is more adequate because of some special circumstance of the situation, the jurisdiction of equity will be sustained. ’ ’ (Warfield-Howell Co. v. Williamson, 233 Ill. 487, 497 .) In Rago v. Village of Melrose Park, 161 Ill.

11924–1924

Where else courts name it

TX 19 (1882–2020) CA 18 (1887–2026) NY 15 (1868–1998) GA 13 (1914–2018) PA 9 (1888–2025) IL 8 (1924–2005) IN 7 (1883–2008) KS 7 (1919–2008) IA 6 (1855–2015) WI 6 (1874–2014) WA 5 (1935–2012) MA 5 (1868–1994) NM 5 (1974–2019) MN 5 (1879–2024) OH 5 (1901–2016) WY 4 (1980–2005) TN 4 (2001–2014) AL 4 (1846–2003) MO 4 (1914–2002) MI 4 (1985–2009) CO 4 (1982–2011) OR 3 (1915–2015) MD 3 (1979–2003) UT 3 (1990–2025) NJ 3 (1896–2018) CT 3 (1878–2000) WV 3 (1919–2001) DE 3 (1935–1980) OK 2 (1928–1987) AK 2 (1989–2010) VT 2 (1894–2020) NE 2 (1925–1953) VA 2 (1884–1900) FL 2 (2004–2013) DC 2 (2006–2023) NH 2 (1975–1989) AR 2 (1927–1944) NC 2 (1993–1999) ND 2 (1916–1976)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check