exception to a procedural rule (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

exception to a procedural rule in Indiana

8 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re JHgreen
indctapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011Moreover, a “procedural statute may not operate as an exception to a procedural rule having general application.” In re J.H., 898 N.E.2d 1265, 1270 (Ind.Ct.App. 2009), trans. denied.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Jackson v. City of Jeffersonville green
indctapp · 2002
2 sentences

2009Id.

2009Id.

42007–2009
State v. Bridenhager green
ind · 1972
2 sentences

2003Id.

2002Id. at 702 , 279 N.E.2d at 796 .

31996–2003

Where else courts name it

IN 8 (1996–2011) MS 2 (2018–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check