Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPgreen2 sentences2008Martin’s employment status is the focal point of our analysis because of Indiana’s “long-standing general rule ... that a principal is not liable for the negligence of an independent contractor.” Bagley v. Insight Commc’n Co., L.P., 658 N.E.2d 584, 586 (Ind.1995). 2008As we observed in Walker , Martin’s employment status is the focal point of our analysis because of “ ‘Indiana’s long-standing general rule ... that a principal is not liable for the negligence of an independent contractor.’ ” 887 N.E.2d at 131 (quoting Bagley v. Insight Commc’n Co., L.P., 658 N.E.2d 584, 586 (Ind.1995)). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Walker v. Martin
green
1 sentence2008As we observed in Walker , Martin’s employment status is the focal point of our analysis because of “ ‘Indiana’s long-standing general rule ... that a principal is not liable for the negligence of an independent contractor.’ ” 887 N.E.2d at 131 (quoting Bagley v. Insight Commc’n Co., L.P., 658 N.E.2d 584, 586 (Ind.1995)). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
City of Logansport v. Dick
green
2 sentences2001Employees v. Independent Contractors Hendershot's employment status is the focal point of our analysis because of Indiana's "long-standing general rule ... that a principal is not liable for the negligence of an independent contractor." Bagley v. Insight Commumications Co., 658 N.E.2d 584, 586 (Ind.1995) (citing Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Skeel, 182 Ind. 593 , 106 N.E. 365 (1914); City of Logansport v. Dick, 70 Ind. 65 (1880). 2001Employees v. Independent Contractors Hendershot's employment status is the focal point of our analysis because of Indiana's "long-standing general rule ... that a principal is not liable for the negligence of an independent contractor." Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., 658 N.E.2d 584, 586 (Ind.1995) (citing Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Skeel, 182 Ind. 593 , 106 N.E. 365 (1914); City of Logansport v. Dick, 70 Ind. 65 (1880)). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Skeel
green
2 sentences2001Employees v. Independent Contractors Hendershot's employment status is the focal point of our analysis because of Indiana's "long-standing general rule ... that a principal is not liable for the negligence of an independent contractor." Bagley v. Insight Commumications Co., 658 N.E.2d 584, 586 (Ind.1995) (citing Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Skeel, 182 Ind. 593 , 106 N.E. 365 (1914); City of Logansport v. Dick, 70 Ind. 65 (1880). 2001Employees v. Independent Contractors Hendershot's employment status is the focal point of our analysis because of Indiana's "long-standing general rule ... that a principal is not liable for the negligence of an independent contractor." Bagley v. Insight Commumications Co., 658 N.E.2d 584, 586 (Ind.1995) (citing Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Skeel, 182 Ind. 593 , 106 N.E. 365 (1914); City of Logansport v. Dick, 70 Ind. 65 (1880). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Klotz v. Horn
green
1 sentence1997Brown, 172 Ind.App. 434 , 360 N.E.2d 614 ; Klotz, 558 N.E.2d 1096 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Brown v. Heidersbach
green
2 sentences1997Brown, 172 Ind.App. 434 , 360 N.E.2d 614 ; Klotz, 558 N.E.2d 1096 . 1997Brown, 172 Ind.App. 434 , 360 N.E.2d 614 ; Klotz, 558 N.E.2d 1096 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Gunderson v. Rondinelli
green
1 sentence1997Gunderson, 677 N.E.2d at 604 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Cigna-INA/Aetna v. Hagerman-Shambaugh
green
1 sentence1992Trial Rule 26(B)(3) dictates that the focal point of our inquiry into whether work product immunity attaches to the models in question be upon whether the materials were prepared “for trial.” See Cigna-Ina/Aetna, 473 N.E.2d at 1037 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Plymale v. Upright
green
1 sentence1983In Plymale v. Upright (1981) Ind.App., 419 N.E.2d 756,760 , Judge Neal, writing for the First District, noted the historic absence of a precise legal definition of fraud and stated: other theory. *877 “Notwithstanding the lack of an exact legal definition, the elements of a cause of action in fraud are well established: To sustain an action for fraud it must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence that a material representation of a past or existing fact was made which was untrue and known to be untrue by the party making it, or else recklessly made, and that another party did in fact rel | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Mitchell v. State
green
2 sentences1981Sulie v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 204 , 379 N.E.2d 455 ; Mitchell v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 418 , 287 N.E.2d 860 ; Otto v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 398 N.E.2d 716 . 1981Sulie v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 204 , 379 N.E.2d 455 ; Mitchell v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 418 , 287 N.E.2d 860 ; Otto v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 398 N.E.2d 716 . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Sulie v. State
green
2 sentences1981Sulie v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 204 , 379 N.E.2d 455 ; Mitchell v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 418 , 287 N.E.2d 860 ; Otto v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 398 N.E.2d 716 . 1981Sulie v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 204 , 379 N.E.2d 455 ; Mitchell v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 418 , 287 N.E.2d 860 ; Otto v. State, (1980) Ind. App., 398 N.E.2d 716 . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Otto v. State
green
2 sentences1981Sulie v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 204 , 379 N.E.2d 455 ; Mitchell v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 418 , 287 N.E.2d 860 ; Otto v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 398 N.E.2d 716 . 1981Sulie v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 204 , 379 N.E.2d 455 ; Mitchell v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 418 , 287 N.E.2d 860 ; Otto v. State, (1980) Ind. App., 398 N.E.2d 716 . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Sulie v. State
neutral
2 sentences1981Sulie v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 204 , 379 N.E.2d 455 ; Mitchell v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 418 , 287 N.E.2d 860 ; Otto v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 398 N.E.2d 716 . 1981Sulie v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 204 , 379 N.E.2d 455 ; Mitchell v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 418 , 287 N.E.2d 860 ; Otto v. State, (1980) Ind. App., 398 N.E.2d 716 . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.