Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Spradlin v. Elyriagreen1 sentence2014See Spradlin, 2013-Ohio-1602, at ¶ 4 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jaylin Investments, Inc. v. Village of Moreland Hills
green
2 sentences2022Jaylin Invests., Inc. v. Moreland Hills, 107 Ohio St.3d 339 , 2006-Ohio-4 , 839 N.E.2d 903 , ¶ 13, citing Goldberg Cos. v. Council of Richmond Hts., 81 Ohio St.3d 207, 214 , 690 N.E.2d 510 (1998). “[T]he object of scrutiny is the legislative action” and “[t]he zoning ordinance is the focal point of the analysis, not the property owner’s proposed use * * *.” Id. at ¶ 18. 2018Of Moreland Hills , 107 Ohio St.3d 339 , 2006-Ohio-4 , 839 N.E.2d 903 , the court held: {¶ 37} [I]n a constitutional analysis, the object of scrutiny is the government's action; therefore, the state or local law or regulation is the focal point of the analysis, not the property owner's proposed use. | 2 | 2018–2022 |
Goldberg Companies, Inc. v. Council of the City of Richmond Heights
green
1 sentence2022Jaylin Invests., Inc. v. Moreland Hills, 107 Ohio St.3d 339 , 2006-Ohio-4 , 839 N.E.2d 903 , ¶ 13, citing Goldberg Cos. v. Council of Richmond Hts., 81 Ohio St.3d 207, 214 , 690 N.E.2d 510 (1998). “[T]he object of scrutiny is the legislative action” and “[t]he zoning ordinance is the focal point of the analysis, not the property owner’s proposed use * * *.” Id. at ¶ 18. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
City of Cincinnati v. Baskin
green
1 sentence2013In City of Cincinnati v. Baskin, 112 Ohio St.3d 279 , 2006-Ohio-6422 , the parties and the court of appeals made the statutory definition contained in R.C. 2923.11(E) “the focal point of their inquiry.” Id. at ¶ 11. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Beasley
red
1 sentence2011Fischer at ¶23 ; Beasley, 14 Ohio St.3d at 75 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Bobadilla
green
2 sentences2007The Minnesota Supreme Court held that the child’s statements were nontestimonial because “the interview of [the child] was initiated by a child-protection worker in response to a report of sexual abuse for the overriding purpose of assessing whether abuse occurred, and whether steps were therefore needed to protect the health and welfare of the child” and because “neither [the child] nor the child-protection worker were acting, to a substantial degree, in order to produce a statement for trial, and therefore [the child’s] statements in the assessment interview were not testimonial.” Bobadilla, 2007The Minnesota Supreme Court held that the child’s statements were nontestimonial because “the interview of [the child] was initiated by a child-protection worker in response to a report of sexual abuse for the overriding purpose of assessing whether abuse occurred, and whether steps were therefore needed to protect the health and welfare of the child” and because “neither [the child] nor the child-protection worker were acting, to a substantial degree, in order to produce a statement for trial, and therefore [the child’s] statements in the assessment interview were not testimonial.” Bobadilla, | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.