Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hughes v. Glaesegreen2 sentences2003"The doctrine of fraudulent concealment operates to estop a defendant from asserting a statute of limitations defense when that person, by deception or a violation of a duty, has concealed material facts from the plaintiff thereby preventing discovery of a wrong." Hughes v. Glaese, 659 N.E.2d 516, 519 (Ind.1995) (quotation omitted). 2003"The doctrine of fraudulent concealment operates to estop a defendant from asserting a statute of limitations defense when that person, by deception or a violation of a duty, has concealed material facts from the plaintiff thereby preventing discovery *1213 of a wrong." Hughes v. Glaese, 659 N.E.2d 516, 519 (Ind.1995) (quotation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cacdac v. Hiland
green
2 sentences1997The doctrine was more recently described in Hospital Corp. of America v. Hi-land, 547 N.E.2d 869 (Ind.Ct.App.1989), reh’g denied, trans. granted and opinion adopted by Cacdac, 561 N.E.2d 758 as follows: The doctrine of fraudulent concealment operates to estop a defendant from asserting a statute of limitations defense when that person, by deception or a violation of a duty, has concealed material facts from the plaintiff thereby preventing discovery of a wrong. 1997The doctrine was more recently described in Hospital Corp. of America v. Hiland, 547 N.E.2d 869 (Ind.Ct.App.1989), reh'g denied, trans. granted and opinion adopted by Cacdac, 561 N.E.2d 758 as follows: The doctrine of fraudulent concealment operates to estop a defendant from asserting a statute of limitations defense when that person, by deception or a violation of a duty, has concealed material facts from the plaintiff thereby preventing discovery of a wrong. | 2 | 1991–1997 |
Hospital Corp. of America v. Hiland
green
2 sentences1997The doctrine was more recently described in Hospital Corp. of America v. Hi-land, 547 N.E.2d 869 (Ind.Ct.App.1989), reh’g denied, trans. granted and opinion adopted by Cacdac, 561 N.E.2d 758 as follows: The doctrine of fraudulent concealment operates to estop a defendant from asserting a statute of limitations defense when that person, by deception or a violation of a duty, has concealed material facts from the plaintiff thereby preventing discovery of a wrong. 1997The doctrine was more recently described in Hospital Corp. of America v. Hiland, 547 N.E.2d 869 (Ind.Ct.App.1989), reh'g denied, trans. granted and opinion adopted by Cacdac, 561 N.E.2d 758 as follows: The doctrine of fraudulent concealment operates to estop a defendant from asserting a statute of limitations defense when that person, by deception or a violation of a duty, has concealed material facts from the plaintiff thereby preventing discovery of a wrong. | 2 | 1991–1997 |
Yarnell v. Hurley
green
2 sentences1995Yarnell v. Hurley (1991), Ind.App., 572 N.E.2d 1312, 1314 , trans. denied. 1994Yarnell v. Hurley (1991), Ind.App., 572 N.E.2d 1312, 1314 , trans. denied. | 2 | 1994–1995 |
Ferrell v. Geisler
green
2 sentences1989Ferrell, supra; Spoljaric, supra; Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana University (1983), Ind.App., 444 N.E.2d 1204 , trans. denied. 1989Cyrus, supra; Ferrell, supra; Spoljaric, supra; Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana University (1983), Ind.App., 444 N.E.2d 1204 , trans. denied. | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana University
green
2 sentences1989Ferrell, supra; Spoljaric, supra; Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana University (1983), Ind.App., 444 N.E.2d 1204 , trans. denied. 1989Cyrus, supra; Ferrell, supra; Spoljaric, supra; Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana University (1983), Ind.App., 444 N.E.2d 1204 , trans. denied. | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Spoljaric v. Pangan
green
2 sentences1989Ferrell, supra; Spoljaric, supra; Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana University (1983), Ind.App., 444 N.E.2d 1204 , trans. denied. 1989Cyrus, supra; Ferrell, supra; Spoljaric, supra; Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana University (1983), Ind.App., 444 N.E.2d 1204 , trans. denied. | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Guy v. SCHULDT
green
2 sentences1997This equitable doctrine was adopted in Indiana in the case of Guy v. Schuldt, 236 Ind. 101 , 138 N.E.2d 891 (Ind. 1956), as a method of ameliorating the harshness of the stringent occurrence-based statute. 1997This equitable doctrine was adopted in Indiana in the case of Guy v. Schuldt, 236 Ind. 101 , 138 N.E.2d 891 (Ind. 1956), as a method of ameliorating the harshness of the stringent occurrence-based statute. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Cyrus v. Nero
green
2 sentences1989Cyrus, supra ; Ferrell, supra ; Spoljaric, supra ; Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana University (1983), Ind. App., 444 N.E.2d 1204 , trans. denied. 1989Cyrus, supra; Ferrell, supra; Spoljaric, supra; Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana University (1983), Ind.App., 444 N.E.2d 1204 , trans. denied. | 1 | 1989–1989 |