8 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1925–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bollinger v. Nussgreen2 sentences1983See Bollinger v. Nuss, 202 Kan. 326 , 449 P.2d 502 (1969), and Rector v. Husted, 214 Kan. 230 , 519 P.2d 634 (1974). 1983See Bollinger v. Nuss, 202 Kan. 326 , 449 P.2d 502 (1969), and Rector v. Husted, 214 Kan. 230 , 519 P.2d 634 (1974). | 1 | 1 |
Rector v. Hustedgreen2 sentences1983See Bollinger v. Nuss, 202 Kan. 326 , 449 P.2d 502 (1969), and Rector v. Husted, 214 Kan. 230 , 519 P.2d 634 (1974). 1983See Bollinger v. Nuss, 202 Kan. 326 , 449 P.2d 502 (1969), and Rector v. Husted, 214 Kan. 230 , 519 P.2d 634 (1974). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
US Liability Ins. Co. v. Bove
green
1 sentence2002The Bove court noted that the phrase “in any one occurrence” set no limit on the number of losses the insured might claim, only on the coverage limits per loss. 347 So. 2d at 680 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Spivey v. Safeco Insurance
green
2 sentences1997Co., 254 Kan. 237 , Syl. ¶ 2, 865 P.2d 182 (1993). “[The possibility of coverage] may be remote, but if it exists, the company owes the insured a defense.” 254 Kan. 237 , Syl. ¶ 2. 1997Co., 254 Kan. 237 , Syl. ¶ 2, 865 P.2d 182 (1993). “[The possibility of coverage] may be remote, but if it exists, the company owes the insured a defense.” 254 Kan. 237 , Syl. ¶ 2. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Patrons Mutual Insurance v. Kerl Ex Rel. Harmon
green
2 sentences1993Ass’n v. Harmon, 240 Kan. 707, 710 , 732 P.2d 741 (1987), we stated: “The" possibility of coverage may be remote, but if it exists the [insurance] company owes the insured a defense. 1993Ass’n v. Harmon, 240 Kan. 707, 710 , 732 P.2d 741 (1987), we stated: “The" possibility of coverage may be remote, but if it exists the [insurance] company owes the insured a defense. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Harold G. Williams v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
green
2 sentences1979The court held that both insurers had separate contractual duties to the insured to provide defense, regardless of the merits of the claims against him, stating at 285 F.2d 582 : "Tri-State did breach its contract with Kerr by refusing to defend. 1979The court held that both insurers had separate contractual duties to the insured to provide defense, regardless of the merits of the claims against him, stating at 285 F.2d 582 : “Tri-State did breach its contract with Kerr by refusing to defend. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Winner v. Ratzlaff
green
2 sentences1979In Winner v. Ratzlaff, 211 Kan. 59 , Syl. ¶ 6, 505 P.2d 606 (1973), this court stated: *516 "An insured who has a claim against an uninsured motorist has three options open to him, complying in each with policy provisos consonant with the statute: He may file an action directly against his uninsured motorist liability carrier without joining the uninsured motorist as a party defendant; he may file an action joining both the insurer and the uninsured motorist as party defendants; or, he may file an action against the uninsured motorist alone without joining the insurer as a party defendant. 1979In Winner v. Ratzlaff, 211 Kan. 59 , Syl. ¶ 6, 505 P.2d 606 (1973), this court stated: *516 "An insured who has a claim against an uninsured motorist has three options open to him, complying in each with policy provisos consonant with the statute: He may file an action directly against his uninsured motorist liability carrier without joining the uninsured motorist as a party defendant; he may file an action joining both the insurer and the uninsured motorist as party defendants; or, he may file an action against the uninsured motorist alone without joining the insurer as a party defendant. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. Jordan
green
1 sentence1973In each of these options he may litigate all of the issues of liability and damages (see Indiana Insurance Company v. Noble, supra, and cases cited therein). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Trotter v. Grand Lodge of the Iowa Legion of Honor
green
1 sentence1925In a leading case on the subject (Trotter v. Grand Lodge, 132 Iowa 513), it was the habit of the local secretary to call at the store of the insured to collect the assessments a few days after they were due, and shortly before remittance was to be made to the grand secretary. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.