8 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Tribblegreen2 sentences2005State v. Tonubbee, 420 So.2d 126 (La.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1081 , 103 St.Ct. 1768, 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983). 1987State v. Tonubbee, 420 So.2d 126 (La.1982), cert denied, 460 U.S. 1081 , 103 St.Ct. 1768, 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983). | 2 | 2 |
Andrus v. Allardgreen2 sentences2004L.J. 53, 72 (2003) (case note); see also Louisiana Seafood Management Council v. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Com'n., 97-1367 (La.5/19/98), 715 So.2d 387, 392-92 (citing Andrus v. Allard, 444 U.S. 51, 66 , 100 S.Ct. 318, 327 , 62 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979) ("loss of future profits-unaccompanied by any physical property restriction-provides a slender reed upon which to rest a taking claim ... [T]he interest in anticipated gains has traditionally been viewed as less-compelling than other property-related interests.")) Further, the court of appeal's holding that Caernarvon rendered the plaintiffs' oy 2004L.J. 53, 72 (2003) (case note); see also Louisiana Seafood Management Council v. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Com'n., 97-1367 (La.5/19/98), 715 So.2d 387, 392-92 (citing Andrus v. Allard, 444 U.S. 51, 66 , 100 S.Ct. 318, 327 , 62 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979) ("loss of future profits-unaccompanied by any physical property restriction-provides a slender reed upon which to rest a taking claim ... [T]he interest in anticipated gains has traditionally been viewed as less-compelling than other property-related interests.")) Further, the court of appeal's holding that Caernarvon rendered the plaintiffs' oy | 1 | 2 |
Century Exploration New Orleans, Inc. v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2026The Court of Federal Claims has echoed this viewpoint: “When a plaintiff possesses enforceable rights under a contract with the government, ‘interference with such contractual rights generally gives rise to a breach claim not a taking claim.’” Century Exploration New Orleans, Inc. v. United States, 103 Fed. | 1 | 1 |
La. Seafood Management Council v. La. Wildlife and Fisheries Com'ngreen1 sentence2004L.J. 53, 72 (2003) (case note); see also Louisiana Seafood Management Council v. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Com'n., 97-1367 (La.5/19/98), 715 So.2d 387, 392-92 (citing Andrus v. Allard, 444 U.S. 51, 66 , 100 S.Ct. 318, 327 , 62 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979) ("loss of future profits-unaccompanied by any physical property restriction-provides a slender reed upon which to rest a taking claim ... [T]he interest in anticipated gains has traditionally been viewed as less-compelling than other property-related interests.")) Further, the court of appeal's holding that Caernarvon rendered the plaintiffs' oy | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mitchell Arms, Inc. v. United States
green
2 sentences2009Mitchell Arms, Inc., 7 F.3d at 216 . 2009Mitchell Arms, Inc., 7 F.3d at 216 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
green
2 sentences2009The court found that the appropriate standard for evaluating a taking claim was set forth in Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 475 U.S. 211 , 106 S.Ct. 1018 , 89 L.Ed.2d 166 (1986), where the Court listed three factors of particular significance to the inquiry: (1) the economic impact of the regulation on the claimant; (2) the extent to which the regulation has interfered with distinct "investment-backed expectations”; and (3) the character of the government action. 2009The court found that the appropriate standard for evaluating a taking claim was set forth in Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 475 U.S. 211 , 106 S.Ct. 1018 , 89 L.Ed.2d 166 (1986), where the Court listed three factors of particular significance to the inquiry: (1) the economic impact of the regulation on the claimant; (2) the extent to which the regulation has interfered with distinct "investment-backed expectations”; and (3) the character of the government action. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Tonubbee
green
2 sentences2005State v. Tonubbee, 420 So.2d 126 (La.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1081 , 103 St.Ct. 1768, 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983). 1987State v. Tonubbee, 420 So.2d 126 (La.1982), cert denied, 460 U.S. 1081 , 103 St.Ct. 1768, 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983). | 2 | 1987–2005 |
Tabeling v. United States
green
2 sentences2005State v. Tonubbee, 420 So.2d 126 (La.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1081 , 103 St.Ct. 1768, 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983). 1987State v. Tonubbee, 420 So.2d 126 (La.1982), cert denied, 460 U.S. 1081 , 103 St.Ct. 1768, 76 L.Ed.2d 342 (1983). | 2 | 1987–2005 |
D. L., Individually, as Next Friend of J. L., and as Administratrix of Estate of R. L. v. Unified School District No. 497, Douglas County, Kansas
green
1 sentence2022In support of his claim that the bar owners have no cause of action for compensation under Article I, Section 4 of the Louisiana Constitution, the Governor relies heavily on language in a footnote in the case Avenal v. State and Department of Natural Resources, 2003- 3521 ( La. 10/ 19/ 04), 886 So. 2d 1085 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1049 , 125 S. Ct. 2305 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1090 ( 2005), which involved a taking claim by oyster fisherman against the Department of Natural Resources. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Younger v. Younger
green
1 sentence2022In support of his claim that the bar owners have no cause of action for compensation under Article I, Section 4 of the Louisiana Constitution, the Governor relies heavily on language in a footnote in the case Avenal v. State and Department of Natural Resources, 2003- 3521 ( La. 10/ 19/ 04), 886 So. 2d 1085 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1049 , 125 S. Ct. 2305 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1090 ( 2005), which involved a taking claim by oyster fisherman against the Department of Natural Resources. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Morris v. Nicholson
green
1 sentence2022In support of his claim that the bar owners have no cause of action for compensation under Article I, Section 4 of the Louisiana Constitution, the Governor relies heavily on language in a footnote in the case Avenal v. State and Department of Natural Resources, 2003- 3521 ( La. 10/ 19/ 04), 886 So. 2d 1085 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1049 , 125 S. Ct. 2305 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1090 ( 2005), which involved a taking claim by oyster fisherman against the Department of Natural Resources. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Avenal v. State
green
2 sentences2022In support of his claim that the bar owners have no cause of action for compensation under Article I, Section 4 of the Louisiana Constitution, the Governor relies heavily on language in a footnote in the case Avenal v. State and Department of Natural Resources, 2003- 3521 ( La. 10/ 19/ 04), 886 So. 2d 1085 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1049 , 125 S. Ct. 2305 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1090 ( 2005), which involved a taking claim by oyster fisherman against the Department of Natural Resources. 2022Avenal, 886 So. 2d at 1107 n. 28. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Faulk v. Union Pacific Railroad
green
1 sentence2022Faulk, 172 So. 3d at 1056 - 1057. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles
green
2 sentences2009California, 482 U.S. 304, 318 , 107 S.Ct. 2378, 2388 , 96 L.Ed.2d 250 (1987), held that a "temporary" regulatory taking may require the payment of just compensation pursuant to a claim of inverse condemnation. [9] We note that Allied-General Nuclear Services involved a taking claim brought pursuant to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. 2009California, 482 U.S. 304, 318 , 107 S.Ct. 2378, 2388 , 96 L.Ed.2d 250 (1987), held that a "temporary" regulatory taking may require the payment of just compensation pursuant to a claim of inverse condemnation. [9] We note that Allied-General Nuclear Services involved a taking claim brought pursuant to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.