Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chapman v. Rideoutgreen2 sentences2013See Flaller/)1 v. !Vlutller, 2011 ME S2, ~ '1<5, 17 A.sd 64·0 (listing elements of a fl·aud claim, including justifiable reliance); Chapman v. Rideau~ 568 A.2d 829, 880 (Me. 1990) (setting out elements of a negligent misrepresentation claim, including 7 justifiable reliance). 2013Louis v. Wilkinson Law Offices, P.C., 2012 ME 116, 118 , 55 A.3d 443 ; see also Chapman v. Rideout, 568 A.2d 829, 830 (Me.1990) (adopting the definition articulated in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552(1) (1977)). [¶ 12] Although it is clear from that formulation that the Langevins could recover their loss of investment through a negligent misrepresentation claim, such re *591 covery is not available from Allstate because damages for loss of investment do not constitute “property damage.” See Vigna v. Allstate Ins. | 3 | 3 |
Veilleux v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.green1 sentence2019Veilleux v. NBC, 8 F. Supp. 2d 23, 31 (D. | 1 | 1 |
Binette v. Dyer Library Ass'ngreen1 sentence2015See Binette v. Dyer Library Ass'n, 688 A.2d 898, 903 (Me. 1996 ). | 1 | 1 |
Vigna v. Allstate Insurance Co.green1 sentence2013Co., 686 A.2d 598, 600 (Me.1996) (“Economic injury does not constitute ‘property damage’ for purposes of insurance coverage.”). [¶ 13] To overcome that bar to coverage, the Langevins argue that because they also sought recovery for physical problems with the property, their damages for negligent misrepresentation fall within the policy’s definition of “property damage.” That argument also fails because the physical problems with the property did not result from the “occurrence” alleged in the Langevins’ negligent misrepresentation count. [¶ 14] The Allstate policy requires that any damages for | 1 | 1 |
Horizon Financial, F.A. v. Hansengreen1 sentence2000See McCamish, 991 S.W.2d at 792 , citing Horizon Financial v. Hansen, 791 F.Supp. 1561, 1574 (N.D. | 1 | 1 |
Kirkland Construction Co. v. Jamesgreen1 sentence2000See Kirkland Const. Co. v. James, 658 N.E.2d 699, 701 (Mass. App. Ct. 1995) review denied 661 N.E.2d 935 (Mass. 1996). | 1 | 1 |
McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling Interestsgreen1 sentence2000See McCamish, 991 S.W.2d at 792 , citing Horizon Financial v. Hansen, 791 F.Supp. 1561, 1574 (N.D. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Curtis v. Porter
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Drilling & Blasting Rock Specialists, Inc. v. Paul Rheaume
green
1 sentence2019Because "a negligent misrepresentation claim does not require proof of intentional or reckless fault and thus does not sound in fraud ... such a claim does not benefit from the extended statute of limitations set forth in section 859." Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Oceanside at Pine Point Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Peachtree Doors, Inc.
green
1 sentence2017The court remains persuaded that the Law Court's decision in Oceanside at Pine Point Condominium Owners Assn. v. Peachtree Doors, 659 A.2d 267 (Me. 1995) precludes a negligent misrepresentation claim in an action for a defective or improper product, not involving personal injury or damage to other property. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
St. Louis v. Wilkinson Law Offices, P.C.
green
2 sentences2013Louis v. Wilkinson Law Offices, P.C., 2012 ME 116, 118 , 55 A.3d 443 ; see also Chapman v. Rideout, 568 A.2d 829, 830 (Me.1990) (adopting the definition articulated in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552(1) (1977)). [¶ 12] Although it is clear from that formulation that the Langevins could recover their loss of investment through a negligent misrepresentation claim, such re *591 covery is not available from Allstate because damages for loss of investment do not constitute “property damage.” See Vigna v. Allstate Ins. 2013Louis v. Wilkinson Law Offices, P.C., 2012 ME 116, 118 , 55 A.3d 443 ; see also Chapman v. Rideout, 568 A.2d 829, 830 (Me.1990) (adopting the definition articulated in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552(1) (1977)). [¶ 12] Although it is clear from that formulation that the Langevins could recover their loss of investment through a negligent misrepresentation claim, such re *591 covery is not available from Allstate because damages for loss of investment do not constitute “property damage.” See Vigna v. Allstate Ins. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.