Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
22 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2021 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Halcrow, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of Clarkgreen2 sentences2021Court, 129 Nev. 394, 400 , 302 P.3d 1148, 1153 (2013) (providing the elements for a negligent misrepresentation claim, one of which is "supply[ing] false information" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Nelson v. Heer, 123 Nev. 217, 225 , 163 P.3d 420, 426 (2007) (providing the elements for an intentional misrepresentation claim, one of which is making "a false representation"). 2021Court, 129 Nev, 394, 400, 302 P.3d 1148, 1153 (2013) (providing the elements for a negligent misrepresentation claim, one of which is "supply[ing) false information" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Nelson v. Heer, 123 Nev. 217, 225 , 163 P.3d 420, 426 (2007) (providing the elements for an intentional misrepresentation claim, one of which is making "a false representation"). | 19 | 19 |
Nelson v. Heergreen2 sentences2021Court, 129 Nev, 394, 400, 302 P.3d 1148, 1153 (2013) (providing the elements for a negligent misrepresentation claim, one of which is "supply[ing) false information" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Nelson v. Heer, 123 Nev. 217, 225 , 163 P.3d 420, 426 (2007) (providing the elements for an intentional misrepresentation claim, one of which is making "a false representation"). 2021Court, 129 Nev, 394, 400, 302 P.3d 1148, 1153 (2013) (providing the elements for a negligent misrepresentation claim, one of which is "supply[ing) false information" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Nelson v. Heer, 123 Nev. 217, 225 , 163 P.3d 420, 426 (2007) (providing the elements for an intentional misrepresentation claim, one of which is making "a false representation"). | 17 | 17 |
Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd. Partnershipgreen2 sentences2020See Achrem, 112 Nev. at 739-41 , 917 P.2d at 448-49 (noting with approval that some jurisdictions allow assignment of the proceeds of a tort action where the assignor retains control of the action). 2020See Achrem, 112 Nev. at 739-41 , 917 P.2d at 448-49 (noting with approval that some jurisdictions allow assignment of the proceeds of a tort action where the assignor retains control of the action). | 1 | 1 |
Nevada State Bank v. Jamison Family Partnershipgreen2 sentences2019State Bank v. Jamison Family P'ship, 106 Nev. 792, 799-800 , 801 P.2d 1377, 1382 (1990) (providing that the statute of limitation commences to run when the claimant knew or reasonably should have known of the facts underpinning the claim), I would conclude that the statute of limitations barred Friedrich's claim for negligent misrepresentation. 2019State Bank v. Jamison Family P'ship, 106 Nev. 792, 799-800 , 801 P.2d 1377, 1382 (1990) (providing that the statute of limitation commences to run when the claimant knew or reasonably should have known of the facts underpinning the claim), I would conclude that the statute of limitations barred Friedrich's claim for negligent misrepresentation. | 1 | 1 |
Barmettler v. Reno Air, Inc.green2 sentences2015See Barmettler v. Reno Air, Inc., 114 Nev. 441, 449 , 956 P.2d 1382, 1387 (1998) (recognizing that one element of a negligent misrepresentation claim is that the plaintiff must rely on the misrepresentation in engaging in a "business or commercial transaction"). 5 Appellants' suggestion that the assignment constituted a contract 3 between themselves and Bank of America is without merit. 4Appellants' reliance on Lanini v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, No. 2:13- CV-00027 KJM EFB, 2014 WL 1347365 , at *5 (E.D. 2015See Barmettler v. Reno Air, Inc., 114 Nev. 441, 449 , 956 P.2d 1382, 1387 (1998) (recognizing that one element of a negligent misrepresentation claim is that the plaintiff must rely on the misrepresentation in engaging in a "business or commercial transaction"). 5 Appellants' suggestion that the assignment constituted a contract 3 between themselves and Bank of America is without merit. 4Appellants' reliance on Lanini v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, No. 2:13- CV-00027 KJM EFB, 2014 WL 1347365 , at *5 (E.D. | 1 | 1 |
Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada Bellgreen2 sentences2014Bell, 108 Nev. 105, 111, 825 P.2d 588, 592 (1992) (stating the elements of a fraudulent misrepresentation claim). 2014Bell, 108 Nev. 105, 111, 825 P.2d 588, 592 (1992) (stating the elements of a fraudulent misrepresentation claim). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.
green
2 sentences2018Court, 129 Nev. 394, 400 , 302 P.3d 1148, 1153 (2013) (providing the elements for a negligent misrepresentation claim which include the supplying of false information and justifiable SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) IM7A 4 reliance); Breliant, 109 Nev. at 847 , 858 P.2d at 1261 ; 27 C.J.S. 2018Court, 129 Nev. 394, 400 , 302 P.3d 1148, 1153 (2013) (providing the elements for a negligent misrepresentation claim which include the supplying of false information and justifiable SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) IM7A 4 reliance); Breliant, 109 Nev. at 847 , 858 P.2d at 1261 ; 27 C.J.S. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.