8 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1969–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Spanglergreen2 sentences1979See also Moore v Spangler, 401 Mich 360 ; 258 NW2d 34 (1977), Wolodzko v Wayne Circuit Judge, 382 Mich 528 ; 170 NW2d 9 (1969). 1979See also Moore v Spangler, 401 Mich 360 ; 258 NW2d 34 (1977), Wolodzko v Wayne Circuit Judge, 382 Mich 528 ; 170 NW2d 9 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martin Luther King Junior Elementary School Children v. Michigan Board of Education
green
2 sentences2014Id. at 1327-1333 . 2014Id. at 1327-1333 . | 3 | 2014–2014 |
Fox v. Employment Security Commission
green
2 sentences1979In Michigan, our Supreme Court has repeatedly said that the equal protection clause of the Michigan Constitution affords "the same rights as the Federal equal protection clause”, Fox v Employment Security Comm, 379 Mich 579, 588 ; 153 NW2d 644 (1967). 1979In Michigan, our Supreme Court has repeatedly said that the equal protection clause of the Michigan Constitution affords "the same rights as the Federal equal protection clause”, Fox v Employment Security Comm, 379 Mich 579, 588 ; 153 NW2d 644 (1967). | 3 | 1979–1980 |
Department of Mental Hygiene of Cal. v. Kirchner
green
2 sentences1969Hence the costs of maintaining the state institution, including provision of adequate care for its inmates, cannot be arbitrarily charged to one class in the society; such assessment violates the equal protection clause." *101 On appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States ( Department of Mental Hygiene of California v. Kirchner [1965], 380 US 194 [ 85 S Ct 871 , 13 L Ed 2d 753 ]) the case was remanded for determination as to whether the support statute in question was held unconstitutional by reason of the California equal protection clause or the federal equal protection clause. 1969Hence the costs of maintaining the state institution, including provision of adequate care for its inmates, cannot be arbitrarily charged to one class in the society; such assessment violates the equal protection clause." *101 On appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States ( Department of Mental Hygiene of California v. Kirchner [1965], 380 US 194 [ 85 S Ct 871 , 13 L Ed 2d 753 ]) the case was remanded for determination as to whether the support statute in question was held unconstitutional by reason of the California equal protection clause or the federal equal protection clause. | 2 | 1969–1969 |
Department of Mental Hygiene v. Kirchner
green
2 sentences1969The California Supreme Court in 62 Cal 2d 586 (43 Cal Rptr 329, 400 P2d 321 ), found their decision to have been reached solely upon the California equal protection clause. 1969The California Supreme Court in 62 Cal 2d 586 (43 Cal Rptr 329, 400 P2d 321 ), found their decision to have been reached solely upon the California equal protection clause. | 2 | 1969–1969 |
Wolodzko v. Wayne Circuit Judge
green
2 sentences1979See also Moore v Spangler, 401 Mich 360 ; 258 NW2d 34 (1977), Wolodzko v Wayne Circuit Judge, 382 Mich 528 ; 170 NW2d 9 (1969). 1979See also Moore v Spangler, 401 Mich 360 ; 258 NW2d 34 (1977), Wolodzko v Wayne Circuit Judge, 382 Mich 528 ; 170 NW2d 9 (1969). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.