Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Kolanek; People v. King
green
2 sentences2014Kolanek, 491 Mich at 412 . 2013Kolanek, 491 Mich at 412 . | 2 | 2013–2014 |
People v. Katt
green
2 sentences2004Defendant therefore had notice, in advance of trial, of the prosecutor's "intention to offer the statement and the particulars of it, including the name and address of the declarant." MRE 803(24); Katt, supra at 279 , 662 N.W.2d 12 . 2004Defendant therefore had notice, in advance of trial, of the prosecutor’s “intention to offer the statement and the particulars of it, including the name and address of the declarant.” MRE 803(24); Katt, supra at 279 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
United States v. John Voigt
green
1 sentence2021Id. at 1067-1068 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
People v. Bylsma; People v. Overholt
green
2 sentences2018Although defendant concedes that he produced insufficient evidence at the hearing for a full dismissal of his charges, he asserts that the trial court erred because “questions of fact existed which should have allowed the defense to be submitted to the jury.” “We review for an abuse of discretion a circuit court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss, but review de novo the circuit court’s rulings on underlying questions regarding the interpretation of the MMMA[.]” People v Bylsma, 315 Mich App 363, 376 ; 889 NW2d 729 (2016) (quotation marks and citation omitted). “ ‘A trial court abuses its discreti 2018Although defendant concedes that he produced insufficient evidence at the hearing for a full dismissal of his charges, he asserts that the trial court erred because “questions of fact existed which should have allowed the defense to be submitted to the jury.” “We review for an abuse of discretion a circuit court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss, but review de novo the circuit court’s rulings on underlying questions regarding the interpretation of the MMMA[.]” People v Bylsma, 315 Mich App 363, 376 ; 889 NW2d 729 (2016) (quotation marks and citation omitted). “ ‘A trial court abuses its discreti | 1 | 2018–2018 |
People of Michigan v. Stanley G Duncan
green
2 sentences2018Although defendant concedes that he produced insufficient evidence at the hearing for a full dismissal of his charges, he asserts that the trial court erred because “questions of fact existed which should have allowed the defense to be submitted to the jury.” “We review for an abuse of discretion a circuit court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss, but review de novo the circuit court’s rulings on underlying questions regarding the interpretation of the MMMA[.]” People v Bylsma, 315 Mich App 363, 376 ; 889 NW2d 729 (2016) (quotation marks and citation omitted). “ ‘A trial court abuses its discreti 2018Although defendant concedes that he produced insufficient evidence at the hearing for a full dismissal of his charges, he asserts that the trial court erred because “questions of fact existed which should have allowed the defense to be submitted to the jury.” “We review for an abuse of discretion a circuit court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss, but review de novo the circuit court’s rulings on underlying questions regarding the interpretation of the MMMA[.]” People v Bylsma, 315 Mich App 363, 376 ; 889 NW2d 729 (2016) (quotation marks and citation omitted). “ ‘A trial court abuses its discreti | 1 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Walker
green
2 sentences1983This issue was presented to the trial judge in the course of a pretrial evidentiary hearing held pursuant to People v Walker (On Rehearing), 374 Mich 331 ; 132 NW2d 87 (1965). 1983This issue was presented to the trial judge in the course of a pretrial evidentiary hearing held pursuant to People v Walker (On Rehearing), 374 Mich 331 ; 132 NW2d 87 (1965). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
People v. Phelps
green
2 sentences1980In this regard, People v Phelps, 57 Mich App 300, 306 ; 225 NW2d 738 (1975), is distinguishable from the instant case because there, counsel had requested a pretrial evidentiary hearing, and a ruling denying the challenge had been made by the trial court. 1980In this regard, People v Phelps, 57 Mich App 300, 306 ; 225 NW2d 738 (1975), is distinguishable from the instant case because there, counsel had requested a pretrial evidentiary hearing, and a ruling denying the challenge had been made by the trial court. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.