Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2023 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stone v. North Carolina Department of Laborgreen2 sentences2022See Stone, 347 N.C. at 479 (noting that statutes “that permit suit in derogation of sovereign immunity should be strictly construed”). 2022See Stone, 347 N.C. at 479 (noting that statutes “that permit suit in derogation of sovereign immunity should be strictly construed”). | 2 | 2 |
Oxford Plastics v. Goodsongreen2 sentences1995The expansive test by which relief can be given under subsection (6) is whether "(1) extraordinary circumstances exist and (2) there is a showing that justice demands it." In the Matter of Oxford Plastics v. Goodson, 74 N.C.App. 256, 259 , 328 S.E.2d 7, 9 (1985) (citations omitted). [1] The trial court's 7 June 1994 order is devoid of any mention of Rule 60(b) considerations such as mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect. 1995The expansive test by which relief can be given under subsection (6) is whether "(1) extraordinary circumstances exist and (2) there is a showing that justice demands it." In the Matter of Oxford Plastics v. Goodson, 74 N.C.App. 256, 259 , 328 S.E.2d 7, 9 (1985) (citations omitted). [1] The trial court's 7 June 1994 order is devoid of any mention of Rule 60(b) considerations such as mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vieth v. Jubelirer
green
2 sentences2023An expansive standard requiring “the correction of all election district lines drawn for partisan reasons would commit federal and state courts to unprecedented intervention in the American political process,” Vieth, 541 U.S. at 306 , 124 S.Ct. 1769 (opinion of Kennedy, J.). 2023An expansive standard requiring “the correction of all election district lines drawn for partisan reasons would commit federal and state courts to unprecedented intervention in the American political process,” Vieth, 541 U.S. at 306 , 124 S.Ct. 1769 (opinion of Kennedy, J.). | 3 | 2022–2023 |
Baylor v. Brown
green
2 sentences1985The expansive test by which relief can be given under subsection (6) is whether “(1) extraordinary circumstances exist and (2) there is a showing that justice demands it.” Baylor v. Brown, 46 N.C. 1985App. 664 , 266 S.E. 2d 9 (1980). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.