8 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hargrove v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Here, the district court denied Thomas' request for an evidentiary hearing because he provided only a bare claim that would not entitle him to relief even if true, see Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502-03 , 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984), and denied his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because the record otherwise demonstrated that his plea was valid. 2013Here, the district court denied Thomas' request for an evidentiary hearing because he provided only a bare claim that would not entitle him to relief even if true, see Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502-03 , 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984), and denied his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because the record otherwise demonstrated that his plea was valid. | 6 | 6 |
Riggins v. Nevadagreen1 sentence2020See Riggins v. State, 107 Nev. 178, 182 , 808 P.2d 535, 538 (1.991) (concluding that materials omitted from the record on appeal "are presumed to support the district court's decision"), rev 'd on other grounds by Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 2Tay1or does not argue that appellate counsel should have raised a claim on this basis. 5 (1992); see also Thomas v. State, 120 Nev. 37 , 43 n.4, 83 P.3d 818 , 822 n.4 (2004) (Appellant has the ultimate responsibility to Provide this court with portions of the record essential to determination of issues raised in appellant's appear (internal quotation | 1 | 1 |
Riggins v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See Riggins v. State, 107 Nev. 178, 182 , 808 P.2d 535, 538 (1.991) (concluding that materials omitted from the record on appeal "are presumed to support the district court's decision"), rev 'd on other grounds by Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 2Tay1or does not argue that appellate counsel should have raised a claim on this basis. 5 (1992); see also Thomas v. State, 120 Nev. 37 , 43 n.4, 83 P.3d 818 , 822 n.4 (2004) (Appellant has the ultimate responsibility to Provide this court with portions of the record essential to determination of issues raised in appellant's appear (internal quotation 2020See Riggins v. State, 107 Nev. 178, 182 , 808 P.2d 535, 538 (1.991) (concluding that materials omitted from the record on appeal "are presumed to support the district court's decision"), rev 'd on other grounds by Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 2Tay1or does not argue that appellate counsel should have raised a claim on this basis. 5 (1992); see also Thomas v. State, 120 Nev. 37 , 43 n.4, 83 P.3d 818 , 822 n.4 (2004) (Appellant has the ultimate responsibility to Provide this court with portions of the record essential to determination of issues raised in appellant's appear (internal quotation | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See Riggins v. State, 107 Nev. 178, 182 , 808 P.2d 535, 538 (1.991) (concluding that materials omitted from the record on appeal "are presumed to support the district court's decision"), rev 'd on other grounds by Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 2Tay1or does not argue that appellate counsel should have raised a claim on this basis. 5 (1992); see also Thomas v. State, 120 Nev. 37 , 43 n.4, 83 P.3d 818 , 822 n.4 (2004) (Appellant has the ultimate responsibility to Provide this court with portions of the record essential to determination of issues raised in appellant's appear (internal quotation 2020See Riggins v. State, 107 Nev. 178, 182 , 808 P.2d 535, 538 (1.991) (concluding that materials omitted from the record on appeal "are presumed to support the district court's decision"), rev 'd on other grounds by Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 2Tay1or does not argue that appellate counsel should have raised a claim on this basis. 5 (1992); see also Thomas v. State, 120 Nev. 37 , 43 n.4, 83 P.3d 818 , 822 n.4 (2004) (Appellant has the ultimate responsibility to Provide this court with portions of the record essential to determination of issues raised in appellant's appear (internal quotation | 1 | 1 |
Browning v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502-03 , 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984); see also Browning v. State, 120 Nev. 347, 357 , 91 P.3d 39, 47 (2004) ("[S]peculation does not demonstrate any prejudice."). 2014See Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502-03 , 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984); see also Browning v. State, 120 Nev. 347, 357 , 91 P.3d 39, 47 (2004) ("[S]peculation does not demonstrate any prejudice."). | 1 | 1 |
Molina v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Molina, 120 Nev. at 192 , 87 P.3d at 538 . 2013See Molina, 120 Nev. at 192 , 87 P.3d at 538 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.