above-stated rule in Ohio

8 Ohio opinions name it 3 courts 1953–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Jackson v. Watkinsgreen ohio · 1934 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1953–1953 2 sentences 1953See Jackson v. Watkins, 128 Ohio St., 407 , 191 N. E., 483 .” We hold that the above-stated rule binds a principal which has granted general powers to a corporate agent, thereby constituting such general agent its alter ego, when the said corporate agent, by its conduct, has caused one of its chief officers to believe that he possessed the necessary authority to make contracts for and on behalf of his principal. 1953See Jackson v. Watkins, 128 Ohio St., 407 , 191 N. E., 483 .” We hold that the above-stated rule binds a principal which has granted general powers to a corporate agent, thereby constituting such general agent its alter ego, when the said corporate agent, by its conduct, has caused one of its chief officers to believe that he possessed the necessary authority to make contracts for and on behalf of his principal.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Webster green ohioctapp · 2017 1 sentence 2018Cuyahoga No. 104484, 2017-Ohio-932 , 2017 WL 1026282 , ¶ 5, for this proposition, which in turn cites Akins-Daniels . *802 {¶ 52} But this court did not recognize or adopt the above-stated principle in Akins-Daniels .	1	2018–2018
State v. Sellards green ohio · 1985 1 sentence 2013Such would be the case if the absence of specifics truly prejudices the accused's ability to fairly defend himself." {¶28} The indictment in this matter alleges Appellant "During the time period between the 1st day of June 2009 and the 1st day of June 2010…" It specifies a one year time period within which Appellant is alleged to have committed the conduct. {¶29} As set forth in Sellards, supra, the State must supply specific dates and times where the State possesses said information.	1	2013–2013
Bond v. Howard Corp. green ohio · 1995 1 sentence 1999In Bond v. Howard Corp. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 332 , the plaintiff was employed by an independent contractor when he fell through an unguarded stairwell opening in which the stairs had yet to be installed.	1	1999–1999
State v. Bistricky green ohioctapp · 1990 2 sentences 1995Cf. State v. Bistricky (1990), 66 Ohio App.3d 395 , 584 N.E.2d 75 , in which this court on remand from the Supreme Court of Ohio declined to review any matters of substantive law because the matter had become moot. 1995Cf. State v. Bistricky (1990), 66 Ohio App.3d 395 , 584 N.E.2d 75 , in which this court on remand from the Supreme Court of Ohio declined to review any matters of substantive law because the matter had become moot.	1	1995–1995
State v. Kulig red ohio · 1974 2 sentences 1987The above-stated principle renders State v. Kulig (1974), 37 Ohio St. 2d 157 , 66 O.O. 2d 351, 309 N.E. 2d 897 , inapplicable because the state presented more than just circumstantial evidence. 1987The above-stated principle renders State v. Kulig (1974), 37 Ohio St. 2d 157 , 66 O.O. 2d 351, 309 N.E. 2d 897 , inapplicable because the state presented more than just circumstantial evidence.	1	1987–1987
Connecticut v. Johnson green scotus · 1983 1 sentence 1987Connecticut v. Johnson (1983), 460 U.S. 73 , cited by appellant, is also inapplicable to the instant case.	1	1987–1987
Henrich v. Hoffman, Judge green ohio · 1947 1 sentence 1980Goff v. Gates (1912), 87 Ohio St. 142 ; Henrich v. Hoffman (1947), 148 Ohio St. 23, 26 .” Noting the above-stated rule of construction, we hold that R.	1	1980–1980
State Ex Rel. Stine v. McCaw neutral ohio · 1939 2 sentences 1967Stine, v. McCaw, 136 Ohio St. 41 , 23 N. E. 2d 631 , is contrary to the above-stated rule, and that to assert such a rule requires that State, ex rel. 1967Stine, v. McCaw, 136 Ohio St. 41 , 23 N. E. 2d 631 , is contrary to the above-stated rule, and that to assert such a rule requires that State, ex rel.	1	1967–1967

Where else courts name it

IL 32 (1944–2021) AL 28 (1914–2015) GA 23 (1905–2018) CA 20 (1919–2016) FL 19 (1973–1997) PA 19 (1912–2026) LA 14 (1933–2022) NY 12 (1913–2005) OH 8 (1953–2018) TX 7 (1921–2015) IN 7 (1931–2015) MI 6 (1970–1993) MS 6 (1963–2020) NE 6 (1951–2002) HI 6 (1980–2004) MO 6 (1960–1995) NC 6 (1970–2012) MD 5 (1972–2009) VA 5 (1851–2018) NJ 5 (1927–1989) WA 4 (1902–1960) AR 4 (1987–2010) NM 4 (1986–2020) IA 4 (1938–1949) WI 4 (1899–1956) WY 4 (1956–2017) SC 3 (1934–1985) MT 3 (1959–1996) OK 3 (1950–1980) KS 3 (1948–1995) OR 3 (1962–2011) MA 2 (2007–2012) ND 2 (1977–1977) ME 2 (2005–2009) CT 2 (1939–1989) TN 2 (1977–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check