6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1970–1993 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ybarra v. Illinoisgreen2 sentences1993See also Ybarra v Illinois, 444 US 85 ; 100 S Ct 338 : 62 L Ed 2d 238 (1979). 3 Admittedly, under the above-stated principle, a finding of reasonable suspicion would be warranted if the defendants had acted evasively or suspiciously. 1993See also Ybarra v Illinois, 444 US 85 ; 100 S Ct 338 : 62 L Ed 2d 238 (1979). 3 Admittedly, under the above-stated principle, a finding of reasonable suspicion would be warranted if the defendants had acted evasively or suspiciously. | 1 | 1 |
Lewis v. Homeowners Insurancegreen1 sentence1990As the panel in Lewis , pp 447-449, appears to have recognized, we can easily envision circumstances under which equity would demand that the innocent insured spouse be allowed to collect one hundred percent of the proceeds. | 1 | 1 |
Webb v. Dixie-Ohio Express Co., Inc.green2 sentences1975Hence the imperative necessity of the presumption, in a situation of this kind, that the first person or firm to be called to answer for the mishap should be the person or firm whose name decorates the offending vehicle." The rationale behind a similar presumption was presented in Webb v Dixie-Ohio Express Co, Inc, 291 Ky 692, 694; 165 SW2d 539, 540 (1942): "Because it is often impossible for the plaintiff to prove the agency of the operator, it is deemed desirable socially that the burden of introducing evidence on non-agency should be placed upon the defendant in whose peculiar knowledge res 1975Hence the imperative necessity of the presumption, in a situation of this kind, that the first person or firm to be called to answer for the mishap should be the person or firm whose name decorates the offending vehicle.” The rationale behind a similar presumption was presented in Webb v Dixie-Ohio Express Co, Inc, 291 Ky 692, 694; 165 SW2d 539, 540 (1942): "Because it is often impossible for the plaintiff to prove the agency of the operator, it is deemed desirable socially that the burden of introducing evidence on non-agency should be placed upon the defendant in whose peculiar knowledge res | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Khalaf v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance
green
2 sentences1988Our Supreme Court emphasized with approval the above-stated principle in Khalaf v Bankers & Shippers Ins Co, 404 Mich 134 ; 273 NW2d 811 (1978). 1988Our Supreme Court emphasized with approval the above-stated principle in Khalaf v Bankers & Shippers Ins Co, 404 Mich 134 ; 273 NW2d 811 (1978). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
People v. McGillen
green
2 sentences1986People v McGillen # 1, supra . 1986People v McGillen #1, supra. Officer DeWolf talked with defendant on the telephone for approximately one-half hour prior to defendant’s arrest. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
People v. Askar
green
1 sentence1970But in cases involving statutory rape, a qualified exception to the general rule permits proof of specific acts of impropriety between the prosecutrix and the accused for the purpose of showing opportunity, disposition of the parties, and intimate relations tending to break down self-respect and modesty.” The above-stated exception was explained in People v. Askar (1967), 8 Mich App 95 , 101: “Briefly stated, this exception permits the introduction of evidence of prior offenses, identical with the one charged, between the defendant and the person with whom he is alleged to have committed the a | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.