Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Edmonsongreen2 sentences2004See State v. Edmonson (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 324 , 715 N.E.2d 131 . 2004See State v. Edmonson (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 324 , 715 N.E.2d 131 . | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cope v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
green
1 sentence2007The trial court found that the predominance requirement under Civ.R. 23(B)(3) was not met because "an individual determination as to what the plaintiffs were told by their respective agents will be crucial in determining liability." The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of certification, finding that individualized proof or scrutiny of each transaction would be necessary to determine each claim. {¶ 24} Relying on its decision in Hamilton , the supreme court reversed the trial court's *Page 8 denial of certification: {¶ 25} "It is now well established that `a claim will meet th | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Benson v. Spitzer Mgt., Inc., Unpublished Decision (9-9-2004)
green
1 sentence2005R.C. 2711.03 (B); Benson v. Spitzer Mgt., Inc., Cuyahoga App. No. 83558, 2004-Ohio-4751 . {¶ 21} We find the trial court committed reversible error when it did not hold the statutorily mandated hearing. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
United Telephone Co. v. Williams Excavating, Inc.
green
1 sentence2003Citing United Telephone v. Williams Excavating (1997), 125 Ohio App.3d 135 , appellant contends this statutorily mandated requirement provides a sufficient privity substitute to defeat the economic damages rule. {¶ 18} This court is bound to follow and apply the precedents of the Supreme Court of Ohio. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
McCrea v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission
green
2 sentences1987In so ruling, the court was guided by McCrea v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm. (1984), 20 Ohio App. 3d 314 , 20 OBR 416, 486 N.E. 2d 143 . 1987In so ruling, the court was guided by McCrea v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm. (1984), 20 Ohio App. 3d 314 , 20 OBR 416, 486 N.E. 2d 143 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.