Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 1970–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re the Marriage of Murraygreen2 sentences2023See Murray, 287 Or App at 816 (so stating); Gomez and Gomez, 261 Or App 636, 637-38 , 323 P3d 537 (2014) (explaining that the pri- mary caregiver is afforded a statutory preference, but that factor “is not dispositive”). 2023See Murray, 287 Or App at 816 (so stating); Gomez and Gomez, 261 Or App 636, 637-38 , 323 P3d 537 (2014) (explaining that the pri- mary caregiver is afforded a statutory preference, but that factor “is not dispositive”). | 2 | 2 |
In re the Marriage of Gomezgreen2 sentences2023See Murray, 287 Or App at 816 (so stating); Gomez and Gomez, 261 Or App 636, 637-38 , 323 P3d 537 (2014) (explaining that the pri- mary caregiver is afforded a statutory preference, but that factor “is not dispositive”). 2023See Murray, 287 Or App at 816 (so stating); Gomez and Gomez, 261 Or App 636, 637-38 , 323 P3d 537 (2014) (explaining that the pri- mary caregiver is afforded a statutory preference, but that factor “is not dispositive”). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tingen v. Tingen
green
2 sentences1976Rather, best interest should be determined upon these, and other, relevant factors by a weighing and balancing process, and not by treating any one of them as a fixed rule or standard." 251 Or. at 459-60, 446 P.2d at 186 . 1975Rather, best interest should be determined upon these, and other, relevant factors by a weighing and balancing process, and not by treating any one of them as a fixed rule or standard.” Tingen v. Tingen, 251 Or 458, 459-60 , 446 P2d 185 (1968). | 4 | 1970–1976 |
In re the Marriage of Lundgren
neutral
2 sentences1978Lundgren and Lundgren, 31 Or App 967, 971 , 572 P2d 325 (1977), rev den 281 Or 99 (1978). 1978Lundgren and Lundgren, 31 Or App 967, 971 , 572 P2d 325 (1977), rev den 281 Or 99 (1978). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.