Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1976–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ginther v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.green2 sentences2022Co., … 632 A.2d 333, 335 (Pa.Super. 1993); made an award for claims that were never raised, Mellon v. Travelers Inc. Co., … 406 A.2d 759, 762 (Pa.Super. 1979), or for claims that were not raised against the party against whom they were awarded, Alaia v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 928 A.2d 273, 277 (Pa.Super. 2007); and had an undisclosed, ongoing business relationship with one of the parties, James D. 2020Co., 632 A.2d 333, 335 (Pa. Super. 1993); made an award for claims that were never raised, Mellon v. Travelers Inc. Co., 406 A.2d 759, 762 (Pa. Super. 1979), or for claims that were not raised against the party against whom they were awarded, Alaia v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 928 A.2d 273, 277 (Pa. Super. 2007); and had an undisclosed, ongoing business relationship with one of the parties, James D. | 5 | 5 |
Alaia v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.green2 sentences2022Co., … 632 A.2d 333, 335 (Pa.Super. 1993); made an award for claims that were never raised, Mellon v. Travelers Inc. Co., … 406 A.2d 759, 762 (Pa.Super. 1979), or for claims that were not raised against the party against whom they were awarded, Alaia v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 928 A.2d 273, 277 (Pa.Super. 2007); and had an undisclosed, ongoing business relationship with one of the parties, James D. 2020Co., 632 A.2d 333, 335 (Pa. Super. 1993); made an award for claims that were never raised, Mellon v. Travelers Inc. Co., 406 A.2d 759, 762 (Pa. Super. 1979), or for claims that were not raised against the party against whom they were awarded, Alaia v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 928 A.2d 273, 277 (Pa. Super. 2007); and had an undisclosed, ongoing business relationship with one of the parties, James D. | 3 | 3 |
Mellon v. Travelers Insurancegreen2 sentences2022Co., … 632 A.2d 333, 335 (Pa.Super. 1993); made an award for claims that were never raised, Mellon v. Travelers Inc. Co., … 406 A.2d 759, 762 (Pa.Super. 1979), or for claims that were not raised against the party against whom they were awarded, Alaia v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 928 A.2d 273, 277 (Pa.Super. 2007); and had an undisclosed, ongoing business relationship with one of the parties, James D. 2020Co., 632 A.2d 333, 335 (Pa. Super. 1993); made an award for claims that were never raised, Mellon v. Travelers Inc. Co., 406 A.2d 759, 762 (Pa. Super. 1979), or for claims that were not raised against the party against whom they were awarded, Alaia v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., 928 A.2d 273, 277 (Pa. Super. 2007); and had an undisclosed, ongoing business relationship with one of the parties, James D. | 3 | 3 |
Chervenak, Keane & Co. v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, Inc.green1 sentence2022“In most cases where an irregularity is alleged, our appellate courts have denied relief.” Chervenak, Keane & Co., Inc. (CKC Associates) v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, Inc., 477 A.2d 482, 485 (Pa.Super. 1984) (collecting cases). [T]his Court has found irregularities rising to the level of the denial of a fair hearing where the arbitrators: exceeded the scope of the arbitration agreement, Ginther v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Boardgreen2 sentences2017Cf. Johnson v. WCAB, 14 Pa.Cmwlth. 220 , 321 A.2d 728, 730 (1974) (proof that claimant’s counsel was incompetent might constitute good cause to allow rehearing). 2017Cf. Johnson v. WCAB, 14 Pa.Cmwlth. 220 , 321 A.2d 728, 730 (1974) (proof that claimant’s counsel was incompetent might constitute good cause to allow rehearing). | 1 | 1 |
McKeesport Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen1 sentence2014McKeesport Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 625 A.2d 112, 114 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1993). 7 For the foregoing reasons, the Board’s Order is affirmed.7 ________________________________ RENÉE COHN JUBELIRER, Judge 7 Claimant also argues that the Board’s Order violates the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution; however, these arguments are not articulated in a manner which states any clear claims. 8 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Karen P. Hales, : : Petitioner : : v. : No. 144 C.D. 2014 : Unemployment Compensation : Board of Revi | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smaligo v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
green
2 sentences1976In Smaligo v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, 432 Pa. 133 , 247 A. 2d 577 (1968), on which the District relies, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the refusal of an arbitrator to allow one party to admit crucial factual evidence from an expert witness was found to constitute a denial of a fair hearing. 1976In Smaligo v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, 432 Pa. 133 , 247 A. 2d 577 (1968), on which the District relies, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the refusal of an arbitrator to allow one party to admit crucial factual evidence from an expert witness was found to constitute a denial of a fair hearing. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.