8 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1997–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McGee v. McGeegreen2 sentences2008Estate of Hume, 984 S.W.2d at 605 (citing McGee v. McGee, 122 R.I. 837 , 413 A.2d 72, 76-77 (1980)). 2008Estate of Hume, 984 S.W.2d at 605 (citing McGee v. McGee, 122 R.I. 837 , 413 A.2d 72, 76-77 (1980)). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Walkergreen1 sentence2015In State v. Walker, 12 S.W.3d 460, 466 (Tenn. 2000), our supreme court discussed the identity exception to the cite and release statute, requiring a custodial arrest when the identity of a misdemeanant is in doubt. | 1 | 1 |
House v. Stategreen1 sentence2009In striking this balance, the federal trial courts "have traditionally utilized in camera interviews in order to assess the relevance and possible helpfulness of the informant’s identity to the defense.” Sharp, 778 F.2d at 1187 ; see also House, 44 S.W.3d at 517 . 7 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dyle
green
2 sentences2010Id. 2010In Dyle , 899 S.W.2d at 612 , the Supreme Court promulgated an identity instruction which must be given to the jury by the trial cou rt when ide ntification is a m aterial issue and it is requ ested b y defens e coun sel. | 4 | 1997–2010 |
In Re Estate of Hume
green
2 sentences2008Estate of Hume, 984 S.W.2d at 605 (citing McGee v. McGee, 122 R.I. 837 , 413 A.2d 72, 76-77 (1980)). 2008Estate of Hume, 984 S.W.2d at 605 (citing McGee v. McGee, 122 R.I. 837 , 413 A.2d 72, 76-77 (1980)). | 2 | 2008–2008 |
United States v. Alvin G. Sharp
green
1 sentence2009In striking this balance, the federal trial courts "have traditionally utilized in camera interviews in order to assess the relevance and possible helpfulness of the informant’s identity to the defense.” Sharp, 778 F.2d at 1187 ; see also House, 44 S.W.3d at 517 . 7 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.