8 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Culbreathgreen1 sentence2024The State, citing State v. Culbreath, 30 S.W.3d 309, 312 (Tenn. 2000) (“[A]n actual conflict of interest . . . includes any circumstances in which an attorney cannot exercise his or her - 25 - independent professional judgment free of ‘compromising interests and loyalties.’”), argues that defense counsel’s role as treasurer for the ADA’s judicial campaign raises, at most, an appearance of impropriety, rather than an actual conflict of interest, because defense counsel did not represent the ADA “as a client, and his role as treasurer did not impair his ability to ‘exercise his independent profe | 1 | 1 |
State v. Duttongreen1 sentence2015Relative to Ms. Murray, the record reflects that defense counsel did not lay the proper foundation for opinion testimony based upon personal knowledge, see, e.g., State v. Dutton, 896 S.W.2d 114, 118 (Tenn. 1995), and that the trial court sustained an objection to defense counsel’s asking Ms. Murray whether she would believe Ms. Knight’s testimony under oath based upon her reputation in the community for truth and veracity. | 1 | 1 |
State v. McNeilgreen2 sentences2000See Lampkins, 515 A.2d at 431 (citation omitted); see also State v. McNeil, 350 N.C. 657 , 518 S.E.2d 486, 501 (1999), petition for certiorari filed, (Jan. 7, 2000) (“The law wisely permits evidence not otherwise admissible to be offered to explain or rebut evidence elicited by the defendant himself.”). 2000See Lampkins, 515 A.2d at 431 (citation omitted); see also State v. McNeil, 350 N.C. 657 , 518 S.E.2d 486, 501 (1999), petition for certiorari filed, (Jan. 7, 2000) (“The law wisely permits evidence not otherwise admissible to be offered to explain or rebut evidence elicited by the defendant himself.”). | 1 | 1 |
Lampkins v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2000See Lampkins, 515 A.2d at 431 (citation omitted); see also State v. McNeil, 350 N.C. 657 , 518 S.E.2d 486, 501 (1999), petition for certiorari filed, (Jan. 7, 2000) (“The law wisely permits evidence not otherwise admissible to be offered to explain or rebut evidence elicited by the defendant himself.”). | 1 | 1 |
Forbes v. Stategreen1 sentence1988The appellate courts of this State have refused to extend the rule announced in Forbes v. State, 559 S.W.2d 318, 321 (Tenn.1977), to non-victim witnesses. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. King
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
STATE of Tennessee v. DeWayne COLLIER AKA Patrick Collier
green
1 sentence2017As stated previously, when a defendant chooses to present proof after the trial court denies the motion for judgment of acquittal made at the close of the State’s case-in- chief, he “waive[s] any claim of error for failure to grant the motion for judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of the proof offered by the State.” Collier, 411 S.W.3d at 893 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Calvin Eugene BRYANT v. STATE of Tennessee
green
1 sentence2015Id. at 526 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Yeager v. Farwell
green
2 sentences1986The defendant insists that the trial judge erred in refusing to sever the defendants for trial and in admitting the confession of Randall Joe Sexton, a nontestifying co-defendant, citing Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed. 476 (1968). 1986The defendant insists that the trial judge erred in refusing to sever the defendants for trial and in admitting the confession of Randall Joe Sexton, a nontestifying co-defendant, citing Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed. 476 (1968). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Bruton v. United States
green
2 sentences1986The defendant insists that the trial judge erred in refusing to sever the defendants for trial and in admitting the confession of Randall Joe Sexton, a nontestifying co-defendant, citing Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed. 476 (1968). 1986The defendant insists that the trial judge erred in refusing to sever the defendants for trial and in admitting the confession of Randall Joe Sexton, a nontestifying co-defendant, citing Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed. 476 (1968). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.