Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Cartergreen2 sentences2007See People v. Carter, 462 Mich. 206, 214-215 , 612 N.W.2d 144 (2000). [Slip op. at 2.] II. 2007See People v. Carter, 462 Mich. 206, 214-215 , 612 N.W.2d 144 (2000). [Slip op. at 2.] II. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Martingreen2 sentences1981The failure to move for a continuance is strongly indicative of a lack of prejudice.’ People v Martin, 44 Mich App 254, 257; 205 NW2d 96 (1972).” The record reflects that no error requiring reversal occurred in the instant case due to "surprise”. 1981The failure to move for a continuance is strongly indicative of a lack of prejudice.’ People v Martin, 44 Mich App 254, 257; 205 NW2d 96 (1972).” The record reflects that no error requiring reversal occurred in the instant case due to "surprise”. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Jackson (On Reconsideration)
green
2 sentences2018A. PRESERVATION & STANDARD OF REVIEW In order to preserve a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant is required to “move the trial court for a new trial or a Ginther[5] hearing.” People v Jackson, 313 Mich App 409, 431 ; 884 NW2d 297 (2015). 2018A. PRESERVATION & STANDARD OF REVIEW In order to preserve a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant is required to “move the trial court for a new trial or a Ginther[5] hearing.” People v Jackson, 313 Mich App 409, 431 ; 884 NW2d 297 (2015). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
People v. LaLone
green
2 sentences2017People v LaLone, 432 Mich 103 , 128- 129; 437 NW2d 611 (1989). 2017People v LaLone, 432 Mich 103 , 128- 129; 437 NW2d 611 (1989). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2020On appeal, Deryke appears to be arguing that her due-process rights were violated because the prosecution failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83, 87 ; 83 S Ct 1194 ; 10 L Ed 2d 215 (1963) and that her due-process rights were violated because the prosecution failed to preserve evidentiary material that may have exonerated her. 2020On appeal, Deryke appears to be arguing that her due-process rights were violated because the prosecution failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83, 87 ; 83 S Ct 1194 ; 10 L Ed 2d 215 (1963) and that her due-process rights were violated because the prosecution failed to preserve evidentiary material that may have exonerated her. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Vaughn
green
1 sentence2019Vaughn, 491 Mich at 669 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Wilson v. Stilwill
green
2 sentences1989Nor do we believe the record reflects that defense counsel showed "through questioning and argument ... a studied purpose to prejudice the jury.” Wilson v Stilwill, 411 Mich 587, 605 ; 309 NW2d 898 (1981). 1989Nor do we believe the record reflects that defense counsel showed "through questioning and argument ... a studied purpose to prejudice the jury.” Wilson v Stilwill, 411 Mich 587, 605 ; 309 NW2d 898 (1981). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.