Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Keith v. Keithgreen2 sentences2015Palacios v. Palacios, S.W.3d , 2009 WL 1653453 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet. h.) ; Bluestar Energy, Inc. v. Murphy, 205 S.W.3d 96, 101 (Tex. App. — Eastland 2006, pet. denied); Keith v. Keith, 221 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Tex. App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.); see also Naguib v. Naguib, 137 S.W.3d 367, 376 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2004, pet. denied.) ("a party to a lawsuit cannot ask something of a trial court and then complain on appeal that the trial court committed error in granting that party's request"); Dallas County v. Sweitzer, 881 S.W.2d 757, 770 (Tex. App. — Dallas, 1994, writ. denie 2009Bluestar Energy, Inc. v. Murphy, 205 S.W.3d 96, 101 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2006, pet. denied); Keith v. Keith, 221 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). | 5 | 5 |
Bluestar Energy, Inc. v. Murphygreen2 sentences2015Palacios v. Palacios, S.W.3d , 2009 WL 1653453 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet. h.) ; Bluestar Energy, Inc. v. Murphy, 205 S.W.3d 96, 101 (Tex. App. — Eastland 2006, pet. denied); Keith v. Keith, 221 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Tex. App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.); see also Naguib v. Naguib, 137 S.W.3d 367, 376 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2004, pet. denied.) ("a party to a lawsuit cannot ask something of a trial court and then complain on appeal that the trial court committed error in granting that party's request"); Dallas County v. Sweitzer, 881 S.W.2d 757, 770 (Tex. App. — Dallas, 1994, writ. denie 2009Bluestar Energy, Inc. v. Murphy, 205 S.W.3d 96, 101 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2006, pet. denied); Keith v. Keith, 221 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). | 5 | 5 |
Kelly v. Demoss Owners Ass'ngreen2 sentences2009The concept of invited error not only is well established in Texas jurisprudence, Kelly v. Demoss Owners Ass’n., 71 S.W.3d 419, 424 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2002, no pet.), but also prevents a litigant from complaining about mistakes that he helped cause. 2009The concept of invited error not only is well established in Texas jurisprudence, Kelly v. Demoss Owners Ass’n. , 71 S.W.3d 419, 424 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2002, no pet.), but also prevents a litigant from complaining about mistakes that he helped cause. | 4 | 4 |
In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Mary PALACIOS and Jesus Palacios and in the Interest of L.P., a Childgreen2 sentences2020See In re Marriage of Palacios, 358 S.W.3d 662, 664 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, pet. denied). 2015Palacios v. Palacios, S.W.3d , 2009 WL 1653453 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet. h.) ; Bluestar Energy, Inc. v. Murphy, 205 S.W.3d 96, 101 (Tex. App. — Eastland 2006, pet. denied); Keith v. Keith, 221 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Tex. App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.); see also Naguib v. Naguib, 137 S.W.3d 367, 376 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2004, pet. denied.) ("a party to a lawsuit cannot ask something of a trial court and then complain on appeal that the trial court committed error in granting that party's request"); Dallas County v. Sweitzer, 881 S.W.2d 757, 770 (Tex. App. — Dallas, 1994, writ. denie | 1 | 2 |
Dallas County v. Sweitzergreen1 sentence2015Palacios v. Palacios, S.W.3d , 2009 WL 1653453 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet. h.) ; Bluestar Energy, Inc. v. Murphy, 205 S.W.3d 96, 101 (Tex. App. — Eastland 2006, pet. denied); Keith v. Keith, 221 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Tex. App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.); see also Naguib v. Naguib, 137 S.W.3d 367, 376 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2004, pet. denied.) ("a party to a lawsuit cannot ask something of a trial court and then complain on appeal that the trial court committed error in granting that party's request"); Dallas County v. Sweitzer, 881 S.W.2d 757, 770 (Tex. App. — Dallas, 1994, writ. denie | 1 | 1 |
Naguib v. Naguibgreen1 sentence2015Palacios v. Palacios, S.W.3d , 2009 WL 1653453 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, no pet. h.) ; Bluestar Energy, Inc. v. Murphy, 205 S.W.3d 96, 101 (Tex. App. — Eastland 2006, pet. denied); Keith v. Keith, 221 S.W.3d 156, 163 (Tex. App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.); see also Naguib v. Naguib, 137 S.W.3d 367, 376 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2004, pet. denied.) ("a party to a lawsuit cannot ask something of a trial court and then complain on appeal that the trial court committed error in granting that party's request"); Dallas County v. Sweitzer, 881 S.W.2d 757, 770 (Tex. App. — Dallas, 1994, writ. denie | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Thomas, 621 S.W.2d at 165 (“appellant may not now complain of possible prejudicial effects from a charge he himself requested”), citing Cadd v. State, 587 S.W.2d 736, 741 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Cadd v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Thomas, 621 S.W.2d at 165 (“appellant may not now complain of possible prejudicial effects from a charge he himself requested”), citing Cadd v. State, 587 S.W.2d 736, 741 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Neasbitt v. Warrengreen2 sentences2015A few minutes later, Father’s attorney concluded his argument by seeking yet a different outcome: (1) placement of S.T. with Father, or (2) placement of S.T. with her grandmother. 7 In its May 29, 2015 order, the trial court appointed DFPS as perma nent managing conservator of S.T. with P.T. as S.T.’s temporary possessory conservator, and ordered that Father have reasonable visitation and access to S.T. “as agreed upon, arranged by, and supervised by DFPS or any responsible adult approved by DFPS.” The concept of invited error in Texas jurisprudence is said to be “grounded in even justice and 2015A few minutes later, Father’s attorney concluded his argument by seeking yet a different outcome: (1) placement of S.T. with Father, or (2) placement of S.T. with her grandmother.7 In its May 29, 2015 order, the trial court appointed DFPS as permanent managing conservator of S.T. with P.T. as S.T.’s temporary possessory conservator, and ordered that Father have reasonable visitation and access to S.T. “as agreed upon, arranged by, and supervised by DFPS or any responsible adult approved by DFPS.” The concept of invited error in Texas jurisprudence is said to be “grounded in even justice and di | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Northeast Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. Hodges
green
2 sentences2015Tex. Motor Lines, Inc. v. Hodges, 138 Tex. 280 , 158 S.W.2d 487 , 487-88 (1942)). 2015Tex. Motor Lines, Inc. v. Hodges, 138 Tex. 280 , 158 S.W.2d 487 , 487-88 (1942)). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.