Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 2000–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Young v. Dretkegreen2 sentences2006See Young , 356 F.3d at 628 . 2006See Young, 356 F.3d at 628 . | 2 | 2 |
Air Liquide America Corp. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineersgreen1 sentence2013Corp., 359 F.3d at 362 (original emphasis). | 1 | 1 |
Harris County Flood Control District v. Great American Insurance Co.green1 sentence2013Corp., 359 S.W.3d at 362 (original emphasis). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc.
green
2 sentences2021Here, in contrast, State Farm paid significantly less within the statutory deadline than the amount the appraisers ultimately determined that it owed on the claim. 35 150 S.W.3d 423 , 426–28 (Tex. 2004) (interpreting the definition of “claim” in Chapter 542’s substantively similar predecessor statute). 36 Id. at 426 ; see TEX. 2021Here, in contrast, State Farm paid significantly less within the statutory deadline than the amount the appraisers ultimately determined that it owed on the claim. 35 150 S.W.3d 423 , 426–28 (Tex. 2004) (interpreting the definition of “claim” in Chapter 542’s substantively similar predecessor statute). 36 Id. at 426 ; see TEX. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Burl D. Pilgrim and Martha Pilgrim v. Fortune Drilling Company, Inc.
green
1 sentence2018In that case, an employee of Fortune Drilling Company, who worked on a rig over 100 miles from his home, was involved in a car accident while driving his truck home after a shift. 653 F.2d at 983 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Saloom v. Texas Department of Family & Child Protective Services
green
1 sentence2016Id. at 430 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
green
1 sentence2000In Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., the Fifth Circuit rejected a challenge admitting the plaintiffs evidence that he had a greater than fifty percent chance of developing asbestos-related cancer. 761 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir.1985). | 1 | 2000–2000 |