Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Griggs v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Griggs, 167 S.W.3d 74, 79 (Tex.App.-Waco 2005). 2007Griggs, 167 S.W.3d 74, 79 (Tex. App-Waco 2005). | 2 | 2 |
Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.green1 sentence2023Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982)). | 1 | 1 |
James Patrasso v. Keith O. Nelsongreen1 sentence2015“The effect of a decree, as an adjudication conclusive on the parties, is not determined by isolated passages in opinion, but by examination of issues made and intended to be submitted and decided.” State of Okla. v. State of Texas, 272 U.S. 21 , 42–43, 47 S.Ct. 9 , 71 L.Ed. 145 (1926). 6 The Government cites to Patrasso v. Nelson, 121 F.3d 297, 301 (7th Cir.1997) to argue that res judicata categorically does not apply to federal habeas petitions. | 1 | 1 |
Lopez v. Davisgreen2 sentences2015See Lopez v. Davis, 531 U.S. 230, 235 , 121 S.Ct. 714 , 148 *408 We have held that, under the 1995 version of § L.Ed.2d 635 (2001). 550.58, the BOP's “exclusion of ... drug convictions with enhanced sentences due to possession of a weapon from Ruling on Griggs' motion to compel, the Oklahoma federal eligibility for early release after substance abuse treatment is court held that no liberty interest in a sentence reduction consistent with the letter and spirit of the [BOP]'s authority had been created, and that Griggs could not establish a as derived from [§ 3621(e) ].” Venegas v. Henman, 126 F 2015See Lopez v. Davis, 531 U.S. 230, 235 , 121 S.Ct. 714 , 148 *408 We have held that, under the 1995 version of § L.Ed.2d 635 (2001). 550.58, the BOP's “exclusion of ... drug convictions with enhanced sentences due to possession of a weapon from Ruling on Griggs' motion to compel, the Oklahoma federal eligibility for early release after substance abuse treatment is court held that no liberty interest in a sentence reduction consistent with the letter and spirit of the [BOP]'s authority had been created, and that Griggs could not establish a as derived from [§ 3621(e) ].” Venegas v. Henman, 126 F | 1 | 1 |
Finlan v. Peavygreen2 sentences2011See Finlan, 205 S.W.3d at 655 . 2011See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Judwin Properties, Inc. v. Griggs & Harrison
green
2 sentences1997On appeal, the Houston Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not err in granting Griggs’s motion for summary judgment despite the motions failure to specifically address and seek relief on each of the causes of action asserted in Judwin’s amended counterclaim. 6 The court reasoned that Griggs’s motion for summary judgment “contemplated all causes of action set out in Judwin’s amended counterclaim.” Id. at 502 . 1996Id. at 502-03 . *673 We held that, after Judwin amended its counterclaim and filed its response to Griggs' motion for summary judgment, Judwin should have specially excepted and asserted the grounds relied on by the movant were unclear or ambiguous. | 2 | 1996–1997 |
Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski
green
1 sentence2023In Coinbase, the Court relied on the Griggs principle: “[a]n appeal, including an interlocutory appeal, ‘divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.’” Id. at 1919 (quoting Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Oklahoma v. Texas
green
2 sentences2015“The effect of a decree, as an adjudication conclusive on the parties, is not determined by isolated passages in opinion, but by examination of issues made and intended to be submitted and decided.” State of Okla. v. State of Texas, 272 U.S. 21 , 42–43, 47 S.Ct. 9 , 71 L.Ed. 145 (1926). 6 The Government cites to Patrasso v. Nelson, 121 F.3d 297, 301 (7th Cir.1997) to argue that res judicata categorically does not apply to federal habeas petitions. 2015“The effect of a decree, as an adjudication conclusive on the parties, is not determined by isolated passages in opinion, but by examination of issues made and intended to be submitted and decided.” State of Okla. v. State of Texas, 272 U.S. 21 , 42–43, 47 S.Ct. 9 , 71 L.Ed. 145 (1926). 6 The Government cites to Patrasso v. Nelson, 121 F.3d 297, 301 (7th Cir.1997) to argue that res judicata categorically does not apply to federal habeas petitions. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Young v. State
green
2 sentences2005Therefore, Griggs "could no more rely on the untimely motion for mistrial than on an untimely objection." See id. 2005Therefore, Griggs “could no more rely on the untimely motion for mistrial than on an untimely objection.” See id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.