Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Poplingreen2 sentences1998See Ex parte Pipkin, 935 S.W.2d 213, 217 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1996, pet. filed) (concluding that the decision of an administrative law judge in a civil proceeding involving a short-lived, non-punitive sanction does not have binding affect upon the determination of a person’s guilt in a criminal prosecution); Ex parte Poplin, 933 S.W.2d 239, 245 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1996, pet. ref'd) (holding that criminal collateral estoppel does not arise from administrative license suspension proceedings conducted by an administrative law judge). 1998See Ex parte Pipkin , 935 S.W.2d 213, 217 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1996, pet. filed) (concluding that the decision of an administrative law judge in a civil proceeding involving a short-lived, non-punitive sanction does not have binding affect upon the determination of a person's guilt in a criminal prosecution); Ex parte Poplin , 933 S.W.2d 239, 245 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1996, pet. ref'd) (holding that criminal collateral estoppel does not arise from administrative license suspension proceedings conducted by an administrative law judge). | 2 | 2 |
Ex Parte Pipkingreen2 sentences1998See Ex parte Pipkin, 935 S.W.2d 213, 217 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1996, pet. filed) (concluding that the decision of an administrative law judge in a civil proceeding involving a short-lived, non-punitive sanction does not have binding affect upon the determination of a person’s guilt in a criminal prosecution); Ex parte Poplin, 933 S.W.2d 239, 245 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1996, pet. ref'd) (holding that criminal collateral estoppel does not arise from administrative license suspension proceedings conducted by an administrative law judge). 1998See Ex parte Pipkin , 935 S.W.2d 213, 217 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1996, pet. filed) (concluding that the decision of an administrative law judge in a civil proceeding involving a short-lived, non-punitive sanction does not have binding affect upon the determination of a person's guilt in a criminal prosecution); Ex parte Poplin , 933 S.W.2d 239, 245 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1996, pet. ref'd) (holding that criminal collateral estoppel does not arise from administrative license suspension proceedings conducted by an administrative law judge). | 2 | 2 |
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Lavendergreen1 sentence2015Safety v. Lavender, 935 S.W.2d 925, 930 (Tex. App.—Waco 1996, writ denied) (observing that under the predecessor statute8 to section 524.041(a) a motion for rehearing is not a prerequisite to an appeal of an ALJ’s final order in a license-revocation hearing), abrogated on other grounds, Tex. Dep’t of Pub. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ellsworthgreen1 sentence2009Delivered: March 25, 2009 Publish prosecution of former Secretary of the Interior for perjury, government could introduce evidence of extraneous acts of misconduct to show defendant’s intent to deceive and to show a pattern of conduct consistent with or similar to the conduct alleged in indictment, especially as there was a “clear and logical connection between the alleged earlier offenses or misconduct and the case being tried.”); People v. Ellsworth, 15 P.3d 1111, 1114-15 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000) (in perjury prosecution of police officer, trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting ev | 1 | 1 |
Walton v. Stategreen1 sentence1998“The double jeopardy proscription of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 14 of the Texas Constitution protect an accused against being twice tried for the same offense.” Walton v. State, 831 S.W.2d 488, 490 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Aguilargreen1 sentence1997Cf. State v. Aguilar, 901 S.W.2d 740, 742 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, pet. granted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Barlow
green
1 sentence2015Safety v. Barlow, 992 S.W.2d 732 , 740– 41 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999); see also Tex. Dep’t of Pub. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Holmberg v. State
green
2 sentences1998Id. 1998Id. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Montgomery
green
1 sentence1998This court upheld the constitutionality of section 724.048(a) under the separation of powers doctrine in State v. Montgomery, 957 S.W.2d 581 (Tex.App.—Houston [14 th Dist.] 1997, pet ref'd). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.