Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wagner v. Warnaschgreen2 sentences2008See McCray v. McCray, 584 S.W.2d 279, 281 (Tex.1979) (holding a child support agreement is largely governed by the rules relating to contracts); Wagner v. *845 Wamasch, 156 Tex. 334 , 295 S.W.2d 890 , 893 (1956) (holding a judgment by consent is contractual in nature); Biaza v. Simon, 879 S.W.2d 349, 355 (Tex.App.-Houston (14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (holding an agreed or consent judgment is governed by the law of contracts); see also Pate v. Pate, 874 S.W.2d 186, 188 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (“Agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties that 2008See McCray v. McCray, 584 S.W.2d 279, 281 (Tex.1979) (holding a child support agreement is largely governed by the rules relating to contracts); Wagner v. *845 Wamasch, 156 Tex. 334 , 295 S.W.2d 890 , 893 (1956) (holding a judgment by consent is contractual in nature); Biaza v. Simon, 879 S.W.2d 349, 355 (Tex.App.-Houston (14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (holding an agreed or consent judgment is governed by the law of contracts); see also Pate v. Pate, 874 S.W.2d 186, 188 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (“Agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties that | 5 | 6 |
Pate v. Pategreen2 sentences2024The proper way to enforce an agreed judgment . . . is by a lawsuit in the nature of a contract action.”) (internal citations omitted); Pate v. Pate, 874 S.W.2d 186, 188 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (“Agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties that excuse error and operate to end all controversy between the parties.”). 2008See McCray v. McCray, 584 S.W.2d 279, 281 (Tex.1979) (holding a child support agreement is largely governed by the rules relating to contracts); Wagner v. *845 Wamasch, 156 Tex. 334 , 295 S.W.2d 890 , 893 (1956) (holding a judgment by consent is contractual in nature); Biaza v. Simon, 879 S.W.2d 349, 355 (Tex.App.-Houston (14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (holding an agreed or consent judgment is governed by the law of contracts); see also Pate v. Pate, 874 S.W.2d 186, 188 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (“Agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties that | 5 | 5 |
Biaza v. Simongreen2 sentences2008See McCray v. McCray , 584 S.W.2d 279, 281 (Tex. 1979) (holding a child support agreement is largely governed by the rules relating to contracts); Wagner v. Warnasch , 156 Tex. 334 , 295 S.W.2d 890, 893 (1956) (holding a judgment by consent is contractual in nature); Biaza v. Simon , 879 S.W.2d 349, 355 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (holding an agreed or consent judgment is governed by the law of contracts); see also Pate v. Pate , 874 S.W.2d 186, 188 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) ("Agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties t 2008See McCray v. McCray, 584 S.W.2d 279, 281 (Tex.1979) (holding a child support agreement is largely governed by the rules relating to contracts); Wagner v. *845 Wamasch, 156 Tex. 334 , 295 S.W.2d 890 , 893 (1956) (holding a judgment by consent is contractual in nature); Biaza v. Simon, 879 S.W.2d 349, 355 (Tex.App.-Houston (14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (holding an agreed or consent judgment is governed by the law of contracts); see also Pate v. Pate, 874 S.W.2d 186, 188 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (“Agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties that | 4 | 4 |
McCray v. McCraygreen2 sentences2008See McCray v. McCray , 584 S.W.2d 279, 281 (Tex. 1979) (holding a child support agreement is largely governed by the rules relating to contracts); Wagner v. Warnasch , 156 Tex. 334 , 295 S.W.2d 890, 893 (1956) (holding a judgment by consent is contractual in nature); Biaza v. Simon , 879 S.W.2d 349, 355 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (holding an agreed or consent judgment is governed by the law of contracts); see also Pate v. Pate , 874 S.W.2d 186, 188 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) ("Agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties t 2008See McCray v. McCray, 584 S.W.2d 279, 281 (Tex.1979) (holding a child support agreement is largely governed by the rules relating to contracts); Wagner v. *845 Wamasch, 156 Tex. 334 , 295 S.W.2d 890 , 893 (1956) (holding a judgment by consent is contractual in nature); Biaza v. Simon, 879 S.W.2d 349, 355 (Tex.App.-Houston (14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (holding an agreed or consent judgment is governed by the law of contracts); see also Pate v. Pate, 874 S.W.2d 186, 188 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (“Agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties that | 3 | 3 |
Boyett v. Boyettgreen2 sentences2002“The provisions of such a contract [as incorporated in an agreed divorce decree], in the absence of fraud, accident or mistake, should not be set aside or modified except by the consent of the parties.” McEntire , 706 S.W.2d at 350 ; see Boyett v. Boyett , 799 S.W.2d 360, 362 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, no writ) (“Generally, agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties that excuse error and operate to end all controversy between the parties. 1994Boyett v. Boyett, 799 S.W.2d 360, 362 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, no writ) (citing Wagner v. Warnasch, 156 Tex. 334 , 295 S.W.2d 890, 893 (1956)). | 2 | 2 |
Hutchings v. Batesgreen1 sentence2005See Hutchings v. Bates , 406 S.W.2d 419, 420 (Tex. 1966) (holding a child support agreement is largely governed by the rules relating to contracts); Wagner v. Warnasch , 295 S.W.2d 890, 893 (Tex. 1956) (holding a judgment by consent is contractual in nature); Biaza v. Simon , 879 S.W.2d 349, 355 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (holding an agreed or consent judgment is governed by the law of contracts); see also Pate v. Pate , 874 S.W.2d 186, 188 (Tex. App. C Houston [14 Dist.] 1994, writ denied) ( A Agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties that ex | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McEntire v. McEntire
green
1 sentence2002“The provisions of such a contract [as incorporated in an agreed divorce decree], in the absence of fraud, accident or mistake, should not be set aside or modified except by the consent of the parties.” McEntire , 706 S.W.2d at 350 ; see Boyett v. Boyett , 799 S.W.2d 360, 362 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, no writ) (“Generally, agreed judgments, once rendered, are contracts between the parties that excuse error and operate to end all controversy between the parties. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.