Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1887–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nitcholas v. Stategreen2 sentences1984See also Nitcholas v. State, 524 S.W.2d 689 (Tex.Crim.App.1975), where “Denny” and “Danny” were found to be idem sonans. 1984See also Nitcholas v. State, 524 S.W.2d 689 (Tex.Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ames v. State
green
2 sentences1987Id. at 112-13 . 1976In Ames v. State, 499 S.W.2d 110 (Tex.Cr.App.1973), we stated that “Any variance between the purport clause and the tenor clause as to whose act the instrument purports to be is fatal. | 2 | 1976–1987 |
Stephens v. State
neutral
2 sentences1928Stephens v. State, 36 Tex. Cr. 1903Stephens v. State, 36 Texas Crim. | 2 | 1903–1928 |
Ex Parte Holbrook
green
2 sentences1994Ex parte Holbrook (Cr.App.1980) 609 S.W.2d 541 . 1994Ex parte Holbrook (Cr.App.1980) 609 S.W.2d 541 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Millsaps v. State
neutral
2 sentences1973Millsaps v. State, 38 Tex.Cr.R. 570 , 43 S.W. 1015 . 1973Millsaps v. State, 38 Tex.Cr.R. 570 , 43 S.W. 1015 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Thulemeyer v. State
neutral
1 sentence1908This case is unlike the case of Thulemeyer v. State, 38 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
State v. Bean
neutral
1 sentence1887And, therefore, where the averments in the indictment improperly describe the import of the obligation of any contract forged, this defect is not cured by reciting the instrument in hcBG verba” ( 19 Vt., 530 .) In the State v. Pullens, 81 Missouri, 387, the rales with regard to pleading in forgery cases are succinctly stated as follows: “ An indictment setting out the instrument forged according to its tenor only would undoubtedly be sufficient. (2 East’s Pleas of the Crown, 983.) In the indictment before us the pleader has attempted to set out the note forged according to its purport as well | 1 | 1887–1887 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.