Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Stategreen2 sentences2003By enacting section 724.061, the legislature determined that evidence of a refused breath test is relevant in a DWI trial and that any such refusal is admissible without requiring a showing of why a defendant refused a breath test. 3 See Griffith, 55 S.W.3d at 601 ; Moore v. State, 981 S.W.2d 701, 708 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd); Bright v. State, 865 S.W.2d 135, 137 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1993, pet. refd). 2003By enacting section 724.061, the legislature determined that evidence of a refused breath test is relevant in a DWI trial and that any such refusal is admissible without requiring a showing of why a defendant refused a breath test. (3) See Griffith , 55 S.W.3d at 601 ; Moore v. State , 981 S.W.2d 701, 708 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd); Bright v. State , 865 S.W.2d 135, 137 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1993, pet. ref'd). | 5 | 6 |
Hess v. Stategreen2 sentences2009See id. at 517 (noting that “the jury did not need any judicial instruction to focus its attention on the refused test. 2009See id. at 517 (noting that "the jury did not need any judicial instruction to focus its attention on the refused test. | 2 | 2 |
Bright v. Stategreen2 sentences2003By enacting section 724.061, the legislature determined that evidence of a refused breath test is relevant in a DWI trial and that any such refusal is admissible without requiring a showing of why a defendant refused a breath test. 3 See Griffith, 55 S.W.3d at 601 ; Moore v. State, 981 S.W.2d 701, 708 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd); Bright v. State, 865 S.W.2d 135, 137 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1993, pet. refd). 2003By enacting section 724.061, the legislature determined that evidence of a refused breath test is relevant in a DWI trial and that any such refusal is admissible without requiring a showing of why a defendant refused a breath test. (3) See Griffith , 55 S.W.3d at 601 ; Moore v. State , 981 S.W.2d 701, 708 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd); Bright v. State , 865 S.W.2d 135, 137 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1993, pet. ref'd). | 2 | 2 |
Griffith v. Stategreen2 sentences2003By enacting section 724.061, the legislature determined that evidence of a refused breath test is relevant in a DWI trial and that any such refusal is admissible without requiring a showing of why a defendant refused a breath test. 3 See Griffith, 55 S.W.3d at 601 ; Moore v. State, 981 S.W.2d 701, 708 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd); Bright v. State, 865 S.W.2d 135, 137 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1993, pet. refd). 2003By enacting section 724.061, the legislature determined that evidence of a refused breath test is relevant in a DWI trial and that any such refusal is admissible without requiring a showing of why a defendant refused a breath test. (3) See Griffith , 55 S.W.3d at 601 ; Moore v. State , 981 S.W.2d 701, 708 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd); Bright v. State , 865 S.W.2d 135, 137 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1993, pet. ref'd). | 1 | 3 |
South Dakota v. Nevillegreen2 sentences1999See South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553, 564 , 103 S.Ct. 916, 923 , 74 L.Ed.2d 748 , (1983). 1999See South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553, 564 , 103 S.Ct. 916, 923 , 74 L.Ed.2d 748 , (1983). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Marrsgreen1 sentence2006Griffith v. State , 55 S.W.3d 598, 601 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); State v. Marrs , 104 S.W.3d 914, 918 (Tex. App. C Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.