Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ortiz v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Bluitt , 137 S.W.3d at 53 ; Ortiz v. State , 144 S.W.3d 225, 231 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d). 2010Bluitt, 137 S.W.3d at 53 ; Ortiz v. State, 144 S.W.3d 225, 231 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). | 2 | 2 |
Almanza v. Statered2 sentences2009Id. 2009Id. | 1 | 3 |
Penrod v. Schectergreen1 sentence2014Nonetheless, assuming without deciding that the trial court’s instruction regarding damages was improper, the purported error cannot be the basis of a reversal unless the instruction “was harmful because it probably caused the rendition of *430 an improper verdict.” Penrod v. Schecter, 319 S.W.3d 737, 745 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2009, pet. denied), citing Tex.R.App.P. 44.1, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Johnson, 106 S.W.3d 718, 723 (Tex.2003). | 1 | 1 |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2014Nonetheless, assuming without deciding that the trial court’s instruction regarding damages was improper, the purported error cannot be the basis of a reversal unless the instruction “was harmful because it probably caused the rendition of *430 an improper verdict.” Penrod v. Schecter, 319 S.W.3d 737, 745 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2009, pet. denied), citing Tex.R.App.P. 44.1, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Johnson, 106 S.W.3d 718, 723 (Tex.2003). | 1 | 1 |
Shelby v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Shelby v. State, 819 S.W.2d 544, 546 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bluitt v. State
green
2 sentences2010Bluitt , 137 S.W.3d at 53 ; Ortiz v. State , 144 S.W.3d 225, 231 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d). 2010Bluitt, 137 S.W.3d at 53 ; Ortiz v. State, 144 S.W.3d 225, 231 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Morgan Express, Inc. v. Elizabeth-Perkins, Inc.
green
1 sentence1991Morgan Express, Inc. v. Elizabeth-Perkins, Inc., 525 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1975, writ ref'd). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.