Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cuidado Casero Home Health of El Paso, Inc. v. Ayuda Home Health Care Services, LLCgreen1 sentence2024Co., 962 S.W.2d 268, 270 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. denied) (noting that conflicting evidence on issue creates genuine issue of material fact for factfinder to resolve and precludes traditional summary judgment); Cuidado Casero Home Health of El Paso v. Ayuda Home Health Care Servs., 404 S.W.3d 737, 743 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2013 , no pet.) (stating that conflicting or inconsistent evidence raises fact issue and defeats no-evidence summary judgment). 16 In sum, whether Morris provided the school with a copy of the settlement agreement in violation of its terms or provided the schoo | 1 | 1 |
Carter v. Allstate Insurance Co.green1 sentence2024Co., 962 S.W.2d 268, 270 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, pet. denied) (noting that conflicting evidence on issue creates genuine issue of material fact for factfinder to resolve and precludes traditional summary judgment); Cuidado Casero Home Health of El Paso v. Ayuda Home Health Care Servs., 404 S.W.3d 737, 743 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2013 , no pet.) (stating that conflicting or inconsistent evidence raises fact issue and defeats no-evidence summary judgment). 16 In sum, whether Morris provided the school with a copy of the settlement agreement in violation of its terms or provided the schoo | 1 | 1 |
In Re Foremangreen2 sentences2016Similarly, in In re Foreman, 365 Ill.App.3d 608 , 302 Ill.Dec. 950 , 850 N.E.2d 387 (2006), the court examined a similar anti-assignment provision 6 and held that “[t]he clear and unambiguous language of the settlement agreement controls our analysis” and such language “should be given full effect.” Id., 302 Ill.Dec. 950 , 850 N.E.2d at 392-93. 2016Similarly, in In re Foreman, 365 Ill.App.3d 608 , 302 Ill.Dec. 950 , 850 N.E.2d 387 (2006), the court examined a similar anti-assignment provision 6 and held that “[t]he clear and unambiguous language of the settlement agreement controls our analysis” and such language “should be given full effect.” Id., 302 Ill.Dec. 950 , 850 N.E.2d at 392-93. | 1 | 1 |
Henry v. Massongreen1 sentence2014See Henry I, 333 S.W.3d at 841-42 . | 1 | 1 |
Serna v. Webstergreen1 sentence2012See Serna, 908 S.W.2d at 492 ; H. | 1 | 1 |
Vickrey v. American Youth Camps, Inc.green1 sentence1996See Vickery v. American Youth Camps, Inc. , 532 S.W.2d 292, 292 (Tex. 1976); In re Ames , 860 S.W.2d 590, 593-94 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1993, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Marriage of Amesgreen1 sentence1996See Vickery v. American Youth Camps, Inc. , 532 S.W.2d 292, 292 (Tex. 1976); In re Ames , 860 S.W.2d 590, 593-94 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1993, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
BFI Waste Systems of North America, Inc. v. Martinez Environmental Group
green
1 sentence2025See Barua, 632 S.W.3d at 733; BFI, 93 S.W.3d at 578 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Insurance
green
2 sentences2016Similarly, in In re Foreman, 365 Ill.App.3d 608 , 302 Ill.Dec. 950 , 850 N.E.2d 387 (2006), the court examined a similar anti-assignment provision 6 and held that “[t]he clear and unambiguous language of the settlement agreement controls our analysis” and such language “should be given full effect.” Id., 302 Ill.Dec. 950 , 850 N.E.2d at 392-93. 2016Similarly, in In re Foreman, 365 Ill.App.3d 608 , 302 Ill.Dec. 950 , 850 N.E.2d 387 (2006), the court examined a similar anti-assignment provision 6 and held that “[t]he clear and unambiguous language of the settlement agreement controls our analysis” and such language “should be given full effect.” Id., 302 Ill.Dec. 950 , 850 N.E.2d at 392-93. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
in Re Mark H. Henry, M.D.
green
1 sentence2014Id. at 729 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Forest Oil Corp. v. McAllen
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 430–31. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Harris v. Archer
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 430-31 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Ford Motor Co. v. Castillo
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 226-27 (citing Tex.R. 2009Id. at 226-27 (citing TEX.R. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.