Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2018–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Umbelina v. Adamsgreen2 sentences2020Umbelina v. Adams, 34 A.3d 151, 155, 157, 162 (Pa. Super. 2011) (election of remedies by dismissal of claim for breach of contract damages with prejudice barred damages award even though plaintiffs’ rescission claim was unsuccessful).2 Moreover, Plaintiffs, by not seeking rescission, also continued to receive the benefit of the Settlement Agreement, including both the release of Defendant’s claim for unpaid compensation while the statute of limitations on that claim expired and the extension of the ____________________________________________ 2 In Smith v. Brink, 561 A.2d 1253 (Pa. Super. 1989 2020Umbelina v. Adams, 34 A.3d 151, 155, 157, 162 (Pa. Super. 2011) (election of remedies by dismissal of claim for breach of contract damages with prejudice barred damages award even though plaintiffs’ rescission claim was unsuccessful).2 Moreover, Plaintiffs, by not seeking rescission, also continued to receive the benefit of the Settlement Agreement, including both the release of Defendant’s claim for unpaid compensation while the statute of limitations on that claim expired and the extension of the ____________________________________________ 2 In Smith v. Brink, 561 A.2d 1253 (Pa. Super. 1989 | 2 | 2 |
Toppy, E. v. Passage Bio, Incgreen1 sentence2025See id. at 687, 692 . | 1 | 1 |
Wilson, A. v. Parker, C.green1 sentence2021See Wilson, - 10 - supra at 353. | 1 | 1 |
Kennedy v. UPPER MILFORD TP. ZHBgreen1 sentence2020See, e.g., Kennedy v. Upper Milford Zoning Hearing Board, 834 A.2d 1104 (Pa. 2003) (considering validity of a settlement agreement where a violation of the Sunshine Act was asserted); Framlau (considering whether a settlement agreement was enforceable in the context of the Public School Code of 1949 (Public School Code)10). | 1 | 1 |
Adams v. Adamsgreen1 sentence2018See Adams, 848 A.2d at 994 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Brink
green
2 sentences2020Umbelina v. Adams, 34 A.3d 151, 155, 157, 162 (Pa. Super. 2011) (election of remedies by dismissal of claim for breach of contract damages with prejudice barred damages award even though plaintiffs’ rescission claim was unsuccessful).2 Moreover, Plaintiffs, by not seeking rescission, also continued to receive the benefit of the Settlement Agreement, including both the release of Defendant’s claim for unpaid compensation while the statute of limitations on that claim expired and the extension of the ____________________________________________ 2 In Smith v. Brink, 561 A.2d 1253 (Pa. Super. 1989 2020Umbelina v. Adams, 34 A.3d 151, 155, 157, 162 (Pa. Super. 2011) (election of remedies by dismissal of claim for breach of contract damages with prejudice barred damages award even though plaintiffs’ rescission claim was unsuccessful).2 Moreover, Plaintiffs, by not seeking rescission, also continued to receive the benefit of the Settlement Agreement, including both the release of Defendant’s claim for unpaid compensation while the statute of limitations on that claim expired and the extension of the ____________________________________________ 2 In Smith v. Brink, 561 A.2d 1253 (Pa. Super. 1989 | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.