Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rami Amir and Ron Aliezer v. International Bank of Commercegreen2 sentences2022“If, however, there is clearly 2 The Waseks argue that it “do[es] not make sense” to require them to complete certain of article 19’s dispute-resolution procedures, such as a third-party inspection report of the wall 6 established proof that a strictly procedural requirement has not been met and that procedural requirement precludes arbitration, a court can deny a motion to compel arbitration on this ground.” Rodriguez v. Texas Leaguer Brewing Co., 586 S.W.3d 423 , 430 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2019, pet. denied) (citing Amir v. International Bank of Com., 419 S.W.3d 687, 692 (Tex. App.— 2020“If, however, there is clearly established proof that a strictly procedural requirement has not been met and that procedural requirement precludes arbitration, a court can deny a motion to compel arbitration on this ground.” Id. | 3 | 6 |
In Re Pisces Foods, L.L.C.green1 sentence2015See In re Pisces Foods, L.L.C., 228 S.W.3d 349, 353 (Tex. App–Austin 2007, orig. proceeding) (holding trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to compel arbitration, and noting that many courts have held “arbitration could not be compelled when parties who were contractually required to mediate or follow other grievance procedures as a precondition to arbitration had failed to do so.”); Amir v. Int’l Bank of Commerce, 419 S.W.3d 687, 692 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, no pet.). (holding that where it is clearly established that a strictly procedural requirement has not been m | 1 | 1 |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingstongreen1 sentence2013See id. at 352-53 (citing Gen. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Edwin Rodriguez and Tonya Rodriguez v. Texas Leaguer Brewing Company L.L.C. and Nathan Rees
green
1 sentence2022“If, however, there is clearly 2 The Waseks argue that it “do[es] not make sense” to require them to complete certain of article 19’s dispute-resolution procedures, such as a third-party inspection report of the wall 6 established proof that a strictly procedural requirement has not been met and that procedural requirement precludes arbitration, a court can deny a motion to compel arbitration on this ground.” Rodriguez v. Texas Leaguer Brewing Co., 586 S.W.3d 423 , 430 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2019, pet. denied) (citing Amir v. International Bank of Com., 419 S.W.3d 687, 692 (Tex. App.— | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Seven Hills Commercial, LLC v. Mirabal Custom Homes, Inc.
green
2 sentences2022“The exception may apply and a court may determine procedural arbitrability questions when the issues are factually undisputed.” Id. 2022“However, there is a narrow exception to this rule: if clearly established proof shows that a strictly procedural requirement has not been met and that procedural requirement precludes arbitration, a court can deny a motion to compel arbitration on this ground.” Id. | 1 | 2022–2022 |