Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Greengreen2 sentences2016Toombs’s counsel argued that Neighbor’s communications with Detective constituted a report of his offenses and were “sufficient to meet the standard reflected in [State v. Green, 2005 UT 9 , 108 P.3d 710 ].” 2 Toombs’s trial counsel explained that Detective created a police report based on Neighbor’s statement's, and argued that the fact that [law enforcement] didn’t [interview V.W.'] does not mean that the Green test was not met.” ¶6 Detective testified that in 2000 he had investigated allegations that Toombs had been “fondling” many young boys, some of whom were friends of Toombs’s children. 2016Toombs’s counsel argued that Neighbor’s communications with Detective constituted a report of his offenses and were “sufficient to meet the standard reflected in [State v. Green, 2005 UT 9 , 108 P.3d 710 ].” 2 Toombs’s trial counsel explained that Detective created a police report based on Neighbor’s statement's, and argued that the fact that [law enforcement] didn’t [interview V.W.'] does not mean that the Green test was not met.” ¶6 Detective testified that in 2000 he had investigated allegations that Toombs had been “fondling” many young boys, some of whom were friends of Toombs’s children. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Dowhaniukgreen1 sentence2026See State v. Dowhaniuk, 2025 UT App 100, ¶ 31 , 574 P.3d 1000 (declining to affirm on an alternative ground because that ground involved a determination that “should 20240257-CA 22 2026 UT App 83 State v. Shay ordinarily be made in the first instance by the [trial] court”). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 10863449green1 sentence2026See State v. Dowhaniuk, 2025 UT App 100, ¶ 31 , 574 P.3d 1000 (declining to affirm on an alternative ground because that ground involved a determination that “should 20240257-CA 22 2026 UT App 83 State v. Shay ordinarily be made in the first instance by the [trial] court”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mooregreen1 sentence2023So providing the jury with details of the Tribune Articles may have been part of a legitimate strategy defense counsel envisioned. ¶110 As to the documentary exhibits, neither M.H.’s poem, C.D.’s essay, nor the Tribune Stipulation were transcripts—they were not “deposition testimony,” “testimony given under oath,” or statements made “at a prior proceeding.” 107 Instead, they were all “received as _____________________________________________________________ 103 State v. Buel, 700 P.2d 701, 703 (Utah 1985) (cleaned up). 104See, e.g., id. (“Defendant has failed to establish that defense counsel’ | 1 | 1 |
State v. Buelgreen2 sentences2023So providing the jury with details of the Tribune Articles may have been part of a legitimate strategy defense counsel envisioned. ¶110 As to the documentary exhibits, neither M.H.’s poem, C.D.’s essay, nor the Tribune Stipulation were transcripts—they were not “deposition testimony,” “testimony given under oath,” or statements made “at a prior proceeding.” 107 Instead, they were all “received as _____________________________________________________________ 103 State v. Buel, 700 P.2d 701, 703 (Utah 1985) (cleaned up). 104See, e.g., id. (“Defendant has failed to establish that defense counsel’ 2023So providing the jury with details of the Tribune Articles may have been part of a legitimate strategy defense counsel envisioned. ¶110 As to the documentary exhibits, neither M.H.’s poem, C.D.’s essay, nor the Tribune Stipulation were transcripts—they were not “deposition testimony,” “testimony given under oath,” or statements made “at a prior proceeding.” 107 Instead, they were all “received as _____________________________________________________________ 103 State v. Buel, 700 P.2d 701, 703 (Utah 1985) (cleaned up). 104See, e.g., id. (“Defendant has failed to establish that defense counsel’ | 1 | 1 |
People v. Murraygreen2 sentences2015See, e.g., Simpson, 439 F.3d at 496 (holding that defendant's outstanding arrest warrant constituted an "extraordinary intervening circumstance"); People v. Murray, 312 Ill.App.3d 685 , 245 Ill.Dec. 430 , 728 N.E.2d 512, 516 (2000) (adopting Green's analysis as "instructive"). 2015See, e.g., Simpson, 439 F.3d at 496 (holding that defendant's outstanding arrest warrant constituted an "extraordinary intervening circumstance"); People v. Murray, 312 Ill.App.3d 685 , 245 Ill.Dec. 430 , 728 N.E.2d 512, 516 (2000) (adopting Green's analysis as "instructive"). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Bryan Lee Simpsongreen1 sentence2015See, e.g., Simpson, 439 F.3d at 496 (holding that defendant's outstanding arrest warrant constituted an "extraordinary intervening circumstance"); People v. Murray, 312 Ill.App.3d 685 , 245 Ill.Dec. 430 , 728 N.E.2d 512, 516 (2000) (adopting Green's analysis as "instructive"). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McCamey v. State
green
2 sentences2024See id. ¶¶ 40–54; McCamey v. State, 2017 UT App 97 , ¶¶ 14–20, 400 P.3d 1114 (per 5. 2024See id. ¶¶ 40–54; McCamey v. State, 2017 UT App 97 , ¶¶ 14–20, 400 P.3d 1114 (per 5. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Begay
green
2 sentences2024That element requires that the communication in question actually contain “information bearing on the elements of a crime as would place the law enforcement agency on actual notice that a crime has been committed.” See id. ¶21 To satisfy this third element, it is not necessary for the reporter to reference specific sections of the Utah Code, or even to specify exactly which crime the reporter believes has been committed. 2024That element requires that the communication in question actually contain “information bearing on the elements of a crime as would place the law enforcement agency on actual notice that a crime has been committed.” See id. ¶21 To satisfy this third element, it is not necessary for the reporter to reference specific sections of the Utah Code, or even to specify exactly which crime the reporter believes has been committed. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2023We therefore deny Mr. Green’s rule 23B motion. 88 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 89 Menzies v. Galetka, 2006 UT 81, ¶ 87 , 150 P.3d 480 (cleaned up). 33 STATE v. GREEN Opinion of the Court determine whether Mr. Green has met his substantial burden, we must “eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight and evaluate the conduct from counsel’s perspective at the time.” 90 And “[b]ecause failure to establish either prong of the test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, we are free to address [Mr. Green’s] claims under either prong.” 91 ¶105 The first prong “requires showing that counsel | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Green
green
1 sentence2023So providing the jury with details of the Tribune Articles may have been part of a legitimate strategy defense counsel envisioned. ¶110 As to the documentary exhibits, neither M.H.’s poem, C.D.’s essay, nor the Tribune Stipulation were transcripts—they were not “deposition testimony,” “testimony given under oath,” or statements made “at a prior proceeding.” 107 Instead, they were all “received as _____________________________________________________________ 103 State v. Buel, 700 P.2d 701, 703 (Utah 1985) (cleaned up). 104See, e.g., id. (“Defendant has failed to establish that defense counsel’ | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Wyatt
green
2 sentences2023So providing the jury with details of the Tribune Articles may have been part of a legitimate strategy defense counsel envisioned. ¶110 As to the documentary exhibits, neither M.H.’s poem, C.D.’s essay, nor the Tribune Stipulation were transcripts—they were not “deposition testimony,” “testimony given under oath,” or statements made “at a prior proceeding.” 107 Instead, they were all “received as _____________________________________________________________ 103 State v. Buel, 700 P.2d 701, 703 (Utah 1985) (cleaned up). 104See, e.g., id. (“Defendant has failed to establish that defense counsel’ 2023So providing the jury with details of the Tribune Articles may have been part of a legitimate strategy defense counsel envisioned. ¶110 As to the documentary exhibits, neither M.H.’s poem, C.D.’s essay, nor the Tribune Stipulation were transcripts—they were not “deposition testimony,” “testimony given under oath,” or statements made “at a prior proceeding.” 107 Instead, they were all “received as _____________________________________________________________ 103 State v. Buel, 700 P.2d 701, 703 (Utah 1985) (cleaned up). 104See, e.g., id. (“Defendant has failed to establish that defense counsel’ | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Menzies v. Galetka
green
2 sentences2023We therefore deny Mr. Green’s rule 23B motion. 88 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 89 Menzies v. Galetka, 2006 UT 81, ¶ 87 , 150 P.3d 480 (cleaned up). 33 STATE v. GREEN Opinion of the Court determine whether Mr. Green has met his substantial burden, we must “eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight and evaluate the conduct from counsel’s perspective at the time.” 90 And “[b]ecause failure to establish either prong of the test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, we are free to address [Mr. Green’s] claims under either prong.” 91 ¶105 The first prong “requires showing that counsel 2023We therefore deny Mr. Green’s rule 23B motion. 88 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 89 Menzies v. Galetka, 2006 UT 81, ¶ 87 , 150 P.3d 480 (cleaned up). 33 STATE v. GREEN Opinion of the Court determine whether Mr. Green has met his substantial burden, we must “eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight and evaluate the conduct from counsel’s perspective at the time.” 90 And “[b]ecause failure to establish either prong of the test is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, we are free to address [Mr. Green’s] claims under either prong.” 91 ¶105 The first prong “requires showing that counsel | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Lavoto
green
1 sentence2005Id. at 913 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Gamblin
green
2 sentences2004As we have noted many times before, "this court is not a depository in which the appealing party may dump the burden of argument and research." State v. Gamblin, 2000 UT 44, ¶ 6 , 1 P.3d 1108 (quotations and citations omitted). ¶ 14 Taking a shotgun approach to his appeal, Green's brief identifies thirty-nine separate issues for our review. 2004As we have noted many times before, "this court is not a depository in which the appealing party may dump the burden of argument and research." State v. Gamblin, 2000 UT 44, ¶ 6 , 1 P.3d 1108 (quotations and citations omitted). ¶ 14 Taking a shotgun approach to his appeal, Green's brief identifies thirty-nine separate issues for our review. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Randle v. Allen
green
1 sentence2001In Rimmasch we held that "rule 608(a)(1) bars admission of an expert's testimony as to the truthfulness of a witness on a particular oceasion." Id. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Young v. Barney
green
2 sentences2001In response, Louder argued Green's motion was untimely and without merit-based on this court's ruling in Young v. Barney, 20 Utah 2d 108 , 433 P.2d 846 (1967) (holding that the joinder provisions of rules 18(b) and 20 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure do not allow the plaintiff to join the defendant's insurance company as a party defendant in a negligence action). 142 Approximately a week prior to trial, the court denied Green's request. 2001In response, Louder argued Green's motion was untimely and without merit-based on this court's ruling in Young v. Barney, 20 Utah 2d 108 , 433 P.2d 846 (1967) (holding that the joinder provisions of rules 18(b) and 20 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure do not allow the plaintiff to join the defendant's insurance company as a party defendant in a negligence action). 142 Approximately a week prior to trial, the court denied Green's request. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.