Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Virginia opinions name it 5 courts 1979–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Congdon v. Congdongreen2 sentences2010BACKGROUND “When reviewing a trial court’s decision on appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, granting it the benefit of any reasonable inferences.” Congdon v. Congdon, 40 Va. App. 255, 258 , 578 S.E.2d 833, 834 (2003) (citations omitted). 2010BACKGROUND “When reviewing a trial court’s decision on appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, granting it the benefit of any reasonable inferences.” Congdon v. Congdon, 40 Va. App. 255, 258 , 578 S.E.2d 833, 834 (2003) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Trimark Partners, L.L.C. v. HST, L.L.C.green1 sentence2007Agency, Inc. v. Garrett, 33 Va. Cir. 18 (1993)), while “notice” commences the twenty-one day rule in which a responsive pleading must be filed (see Trimark, 39 Va. Cir. 415, 417 (1996)). | 1 | 1 |
School Board v. Caudill Rowlett Scott, Inc.green2 sentences1995"At the expiration of that 21-day period, the trial court loses jurisdiction to disturb a final judgment, order, or decree except for the limited authority conferred by Code § 8.01-428." School Board v. Caudill Rowlett Scott, Inc., 237 Va. 550, 554 , 379 S.E.2d 319, 321 (1989). 10 In this case, no exceptions to the twenty-one day rule applied. 1995"At the expiration of that 21-day period, the trial court loses jurisdiction to disturb a final judgment, order, or decree except for the limited authority conferred by Code § 8.01-428." School Board v. Caudill Rowlett Scott, Inc., 237 Va. 550, 554 , 379 S.E.2d 319, 321 (1989). 10 In this case, no exceptions to the twenty-one day rule applied. | 1 | 1 |
Cofer v. Cofergreen1 sentence1979See Cofer v. Cofer, 205 Va. 834 (1965), wherein it is stated, at page 837: The appellee argues that under the provisions of Rule 2:22 [now Rule 1:1] of the Rules of Court the order of September 4 became final and was not thereafter "subject to be modified or vacated." The ready answer is that this rule is not a limitation on the power and authority of the court to vacate a void order. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jamborsky v. Baskins
green
2 sentences2001We reversed, holding that the twenty-one day provision was "directory and procedural, rather than mandatory and jurisdictional." Id. at 511, 442 S.E.2d at 639 . 2001We reversed, holding that the twenty-one day provision was “directory and procedural, rather than mandatory and jurisdictional.” Id. at 511, 442 S.E.2d at 639 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Hubbard Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Garrett
neutral
1 sentence2007Agency, Inc. v. Garrett, 33 Va. Cir. 18 (1993)), while “notice” commences the twenty-one day rule in which a responsive pleading must be filed (see Trimark, 39 Va. Cir. 415, 417 (1996)). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Bosserman v. Newlin
neutral
1 sentence2004Whereas a case extinguished by a judgment and effectuated by the twenty-one day rule is fully dispositive of all disputed issues and facts pertaining thereto, a case dismissed pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-335 is “not dead but in a state of suspended animation.” Bosserman, 10 Va. Cir. at 483 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Herrera v. Collins
green
2 sentences2003Applying Herrara v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390, 407 , 113 S. Ct. 853 , 122 L. 2003Applying Herrara v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390, 407 , 113 S. Ct. 853 , 122 L. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.