Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Olliviergreen1 sentence2014See O/livier, 178 Wn.2d at 845 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pray
green
2 sentences2001State v. Head, 136 Wash.2d 619, 624-25 , 964 P.2d 1187 (1998) (applying CrR 6.1(d)); State v. Pray, 96 Wash.App. 25, 30-31 , 980 P.2d 240 , review denied, 139 Wash.2d 1010 , 994 P.2d 849 (1999). 2001State v. Head, 136 Wn.2d 619, 624-25 , 964 P.2d 1187 (1998) (applying CrR 6.1(d)); State v. Pray, 96 Wn. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Head
green
2 sentences2001State v. Head, 136 Wn.2d 619, 624-25 , 964 P.2d 1187 (1998) (applying CrR 6.1(d)); State v. Pray, 96 Wn. 2001State v. Head, 136 Wn.2d 619, 624-25 , 964 P.2d 1187 (1998) (applying CrR 6.1(d)); State v. Pray, 96 Wn. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Thorne
red
2 sentences2001“Under the SRA [Sentencing Reform Act of 1981], the trial court must conduct a sentencing hearing and, if the court decides by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant has a criminal history, the court must specify the convictions it has found to exist.” State v. Thorne, 129 Wn.2d 736, 781 , 921 P.2d 514 (1996) (citing RCW 9.94A.110). 2001“Under the SRA [Sentencing Reform Act of 1981], the trial court must conduct a sentencing hearing and, if the court decides by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant has a criminal history, the court must specify the convictions it has found to exist.” State v. Thorne, 129 Wn.2d 736, 781 , 921 P.2d 514 (1996) (citing RCW 9.94A.110). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 687 . 12 No. 36436-4-III State v. Lopez We dismiss Lopez's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on the first prong. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State Of Washington v. Randolph C. Clark-el
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 620 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
City of Pasco v. Titus
green
2 sentences1988App. 412, 417 , 613 P.2d 181 , review denied, 94 Wn.2d 1005 (1980). 9 Thus, the court did not err in denying Ms. Lopez' motion to dismiss. 1988App. 412, 417 , 613 P.2d 181 , review denied, 94 Wn.2d 1005 (1980). [9] Thus, the court did not err in denying Ms. Lopez' motion to dismiss. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.