8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
North Coast Enterprises, Inc. v. Factoria Partnershipgreen2 sentences2002The Khorrams do not, however, argue that any different analysis is appropriate for the warranty claim. [40] Brickler v. Myers Constr., Inc., 92 Wash.App. 269, 274 , 966 P.2d 335 (1998). [41] 64 Wash.2d 534 , 392 P.2d 802 (1964). [42] 94 Wash.App. 855 , 974 P.2d 1257 (1999). [43] 45 Wash.2d 675 , 277 P.2d 724 (1954). [44] Ruth, 75 Wash.2d at 667 , 453 P.2d 631 . [45] Taylor, 64 Wash.2d at 538 , 392 P.2d 802 . [46] North Coast, 94 Wash.App. at 860, 856 , 974 P.2d 1257 . [47] See, e.g., Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins. 2002The Khorrams do not, however, argue that any different analysis is appropriate for the warranty claim. [40] Brickler v. Myers Constr., Inc., 92 Wash.App. 269, 274 , 966 P.2d 335 (1998). [41] 64 Wash.2d 534 , 392 P.2d 802 (1964). [42] 94 Wash.App. 855 , 974 P.2d 1257 (1999). [43] 45 Wash.2d 675 , 277 P.2d 724 (1954). [44] Ruth, 75 Wash.2d at 667 , 453 P.2d 631 . [45] Taylor, 64 Wash.2d at 538 , 392 P.2d 802 . [46] North Coast, 94 Wash.App. at 860, 856 , 974 P.2d 1257 . [47] See, e.g., Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Granville v. American Casualty Co.
neutral
2 sentences1963Co., 69 Wash. 154 , 124 Pac. 486 , a policy will not be held void, nor will a warranty clause in a policy be held to have been breached, for a cause known to the agent before the application for the policy was signed, where the insured fully and truthfully related the facts to the solicitor, and false answers were written in the application by him. 1963Co., 69 Wash. 154 , 124 Pac. 486 , a policy will not be held void, nor will a warranty clause in a policy be held to have been breached, for a cause known to the agent before the application for the policy was signed, where the insured fully and truthfully related the facts to the solicitor, and false answers were written in the application by him. | 4 | 1922–1963 |
Brickler v. Myers Construction, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2002The Khorrams do not, however, argue that any different analysis is appropriate for the warranty claim. [40] Brickler v. Myers Constr., Inc., 92 Wash.App. 269, 274 , 966 P.2d 335 (1998). [41] 64 Wash.2d 534 , 392 P.2d 802 (1964). [42] 94 Wash.App. 855 , 974 P.2d 1257 (1999). [43] 45 Wash.2d 675 , 277 P.2d 724 (1954). [44] Ruth, 75 Wash.2d at 667 , 453 P.2d 631 . [45] Taylor, 64 Wash.2d at 538 , 392 P.2d 802 . [46] North Coast, 94 Wash.App. at 860, 856 , 974 P.2d 1257 . [47] See, e.g., Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins. 2002The Khorrams do not, however, argue that any different analysis is appropriate for the warranty claim. [40] Brickler v. Myers Constr., Inc., 92 Wash.App. 269, 274 , 966 P.2d 335 (1998). [41] 64 Wash.2d 534 , 392 P.2d 802 (1964). [42] 94 Wash.App. 855 , 974 P.2d 1257 (1999). [43] 45 Wash.2d 675 , 277 P.2d 724 (1954). [44] Ruth, 75 Wash.2d at 667 , 453 P.2d 631 . [45] Taylor, 64 Wash.2d at 538 , 392 P.2d 802 . [46] North Coast, 94 Wash.App. at 860, 856 , 974 P.2d 1257 . [47] See, e.g., Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Lindquist v. Mullen
red
2 sentences2002The Khorrams do not, however, argue that any different analysis is appropriate for the warranty claim. [40] Brickler v. Myers Constr., Inc., 92 Wash.App. 269, 274 , 966 P.2d 335 (1998). [41] 64 Wash.2d 534 , 392 P.2d 802 (1964). [42] 94 Wash.App. 855 , 974 P.2d 1257 (1999). [43] 45 Wash.2d 675 , 277 P.2d 724 (1954). [44] Ruth, 75 Wash.2d at 667 , 453 P.2d 631 . [45] Taylor, 64 Wash.2d at 538 , 392 P.2d 802 . [46] North Coast, 94 Wash.App. at 860, 856 , 974 P.2d 1257 . [47] See, e.g., Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins. 2002The Khorrams do not, however, argue that any different analysis is appropriate for the warranty claim. [40] Brickler v. Myers Constr., Inc., 92 Wash.App. 269, 274 , 966 P.2d 335 (1998). [41] 64 Wash.2d 534 , 392 P.2d 802 (1964). [42] 94 Wash.App. 855 , 974 P.2d 1257 (1999). [43] 45 Wash.2d 675 , 277 P.2d 724 (1954). [44] Ruth, 75 Wash.2d at 667 , 453 P.2d 631 . [45] Taylor, 64 Wash.2d at 538 , 392 P.2d 802 . [46] North Coast, 94 Wash.App. at 860, 856 , 974 P.2d 1257 . [47] See, e.g., Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
green
2 sentences2002Co. of America, 182 Ariz. 586 , 898 P.2d 964 (1995); Angeles Chem. 2002Co. of America, 182 Ariz. 586 , 898 P.2d 964 (1995); Angeles Chem. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Taylor v. PUGET SD. POWER & LT. CO.
green
2 sentences2002The Khorrams do not, however, argue that any different analysis is appropriate for the warranty claim. [40] Brickler v. Myers Constr., Inc., 92 Wash.App. 269, 274 , 966 P.2d 335 (1998). [41] 64 Wash.2d 534 , 392 P.2d 802 (1964). [42] 94 Wash.App. 855 , 974 P.2d 1257 (1999). [43] 45 Wash.2d 675 , 277 P.2d 724 (1954). [44] Ruth, 75 Wash.2d at 667 , 453 P.2d 631 . [45] Taylor, 64 Wash.2d at 538 , 392 P.2d 802 . [46] North Coast, 94 Wash.App. at 860, 856 , 974 P.2d 1257 . [47] See, e.g., Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins. 2002The Khorrams do not, however, argue that any different analysis is appropriate for the warranty claim. [40] Brickler v. Myers Constr., Inc., 92 Wash.App. 269, 274 , 966 P.2d 335 (1998). [41] 64 Wash.2d 534 , 392 P.2d 802 (1964). [42] 94 Wash.App. 855 , 974 P.2d 1257 (1999). [43] 45 Wash.2d 675 , 277 P.2d 724 (1954). [44] Ruth, 75 Wash.2d at 667 , 453 P.2d 631 . [45] Taylor, 64 Wash.2d at 538 , 392 P.2d 802 . [46] North Coast, 94 Wash.App. at 860, 856 , 974 P.2d 1257 . [47] See, e.g., Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Ruth v. Dight
red
2 sentences2002The Khorrams do not, however, argue that any different analysis is appropriate for the warranty claim. [40] Brickler v. Myers Constr., Inc., 92 Wash.App. 269, 274 , 966 P.2d 335 (1998). [41] 64 Wash.2d 534 , 392 P.2d 802 (1964). [42] 94 Wash.App. 855 , 974 P.2d 1257 (1999). [43] 45 Wash.2d 675 , 277 P.2d 724 (1954). [44] Ruth, 75 Wash.2d at 667 , 453 P.2d 631 . [45] Taylor, 64 Wash.2d at 538 , 392 P.2d 802 . [46] North Coast, 94 Wash.App. at 860, 856 , 974 P.2d 1257 . [47] See, e.g., Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins. 2002The Khorrams do not, however, argue that any different analysis is appropriate for the warranty claim. [40] Brickler v. Myers Constr., Inc., 92 Wash.App. 269, 274 , 966 P.2d 335 (1998). [41] 64 Wash.2d 534 , 392 P.2d 802 (1964). [42] 94 Wash.App. 855 , 974 P.2d 1257 (1999). [43] 45 Wash.2d 675 , 277 P.2d 724 (1954). [44] Ruth, 75 Wash.2d at 667 , 453 P.2d 631 . [45] Taylor, 64 Wash.2d at 538 , 392 P.2d 802 . [46] North Coast, 94 Wash.App. at 860, 856 , 974 P.2d 1257 . [47] See, e.g., Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Backstrom
green
1 sentence1963Co. v. Backstrom, 47 Wn. (2d) 77, 287 P. (2d) 124 , that a warranty clause in a policy of insurance will not be held breached for a cause known to the agent before the application was signed. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Brigham v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.
neutral
2 sentences1924Co., 95 Wash. 196 , 163 Pac. 380 ; Quinn v. Mutual Life Ins. 1924Co., 95 Wash. 196 , 163 Pac. 380 ; Quinn v. Mutual Life Ins. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Bothell v. National Casualty Co.
neutral
2 sentences1912Bothell v. National Casualty Co., 59 Wash. 209, 109 Pac. 590 ; Staats v. Pioneer Ins. 1912Bothell v. National Casualty Co., 59 Wash. 209, 109 Pac. 590 ; Staats v. Pioneer Ins. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Young v. Stampfler
neutral
2 sentences1911In Young v. Stampfler, 27 Wash. 350 , 67 Pac. 721 , the defendant was induced to execute a warranty deed in lieu of a quitclaim deed, upon the representation of the husband of the grantee that such a deed would better enable them to dispose of the property, and that the warranty clause would not be enforced. 1911In Young v. Stampfler, 27 Wash. 350 , 67 Pac. 721 , the defendant was induced to execute a warranty deed in lieu of a quitclaim deed, upon the representation of the husband of the grantee that such a deed would better enable them to dispose of the property, and that the warranty clause would not be enforced. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.